Obama: Disturbing “Change”

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:09 am by Faithful Democrats

Obama: Disturbing “Change” 2013-05-09T06:09:06-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I've experienced two disturbing conversations and one alarming thought in the

last three days. All three were ignited by Obama's amorphous call for "Change."

I've experienced two disturbing conversations and one alarming thought in the
last three days. All three were ignited by Obama's amorphous call for "Change."

DISTURBING CONVO ONE.

I was riding the Metrobus across 125th street, through the heart of Harlem. Behind me is a professional white man talking on a cell phone. He's explaining to a friend why he thinks Obama is the best candidate: "He's different… He's a liberal who calls people to do for themselves, not sit around and wait for someone else to do anything for them."

A DISTURBING THOUGHT.

The picture of the Super Tuesday map crosses my mind. The vast majority of the states Obama won are the reddest "Red states" in the U.S. – with majority white populations. The thought crosses my mind, will the people who voted for him expect and support the kind of systemic and economic change that will be necessary to produce the kind of "real change" he is promising?

DISTURBING THOUGHT TWO.

I had a disturbing conversation with a woman in the heartland of Ohio. She confirmed: "All the white people I know," she said "believe Obama is different because they believe he calls people to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps – not relying on government help."

IMPLICATIONS.

On the contrary, all the Obama supporters I know personally – people of color and anti-racist white folks – are supporting him because when they hear the campaign slogan "Change We Can Believe In" they hear " systemic change" that could alleviate poverty and systemic injustice. It is possible, however, that Obama's largest base of support may be interpreting Obama's call for "change" from exactly the opposite point of view. They may be interpreting the call for "change" through their own cultural lenses. These lenses emphasize anti-structural, individual accountability, according to sociologists Michael Emerson and Christian Smith (authors of Divided by Faith).

If this is true, my white friend in the heartland feared, Obama's election could lead to an even greater racial divide in the U.S. as our Black president is torn between two disparate factions within his own base of support – Blacks and actively anti-racist others who put their faith in him to create systemic change and the rest who voted for a slogan "Change" and interpreted it with the only cultural tools they had.

OBAMA, WE NEED YOU TO DEFINE YOUR "CHANGE"!

To avoid national racial meltdown in the long run, Obama must be clear about the change he intends to bring now:

Will Obama's "change" de-construct and redesign the current public school system and federal funding allocation system, which currently perpetuates de-facto separate and unequal school systems across the U.S.?
Will Obama's "change" call for mandatory clean-up and regulation of environmental injustices, which put poor people (especially those in urban centers) at the greatest risk for life-threatening diseases like asthma, cancer and high rates of miscarriages?
Will Obama's "change" really change in the health care system enough to ensure health care for every American – especially the poor?

I believe the one thing that separates the Clinton campaign from Obama's is Clinton's clarity about how she intends to bring about change. She clearly intends to change these systems and she has clear do-able plans.

Now, the country needs Obama to be clear. It's time for him to fess up. Exactly how is Obama different? Exactly what change will he bring? Is he really different because he is a liberal who calls people to pull themselves up by their bootstraps? Or does he truly offer a vision for changed systems that can bring real "Change we can believe in."

Featured Writers

Previous Post

February 7, 2008

Mitt Romney does not speak for this Mormon

Next Post

February 10, 2008 President John McCain: The Fear Factor

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Nazareth" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Light Branch Gift Star