Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Faithful Democrats

WHAT MIGHT BE A DEMOCRATIC AND CHRISTIAN APPROACH TO IMMIGRATION?

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:09 am   by Faithful Democrats

WHAT MIGHT BE A DEMOCRATIC AND CHRISTIAN APPROACH TO IMMIGRATION? 2013-05-09T06:09:11-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Immigration issue is complex, since it has to balance the rights of citizens of the United States and of those who enter the U.S. legally, with the basic human rights of those who flee their country due to their country’s oppressive, and even dangerous, policies.

The Immigration issue is complex, since it has to balance the rights of citizens of the United States and of those who enter the U.S. legally, with the basic human rights of those who flee their country due to their country's oppressive, and even dangerous, policies. The Statue of Liberty claims to represent an attitude to those coming to the United States – that we symbolize freedom and that we welcome those seeking liberty. Yet, our attitudes to immigrants often don't follow that promise.

 

Sometimes, to listen to Conservative Christian Republican candidates talk, we might think that they are called, by God, to dismiss, ostracize, and kick out the immigrant. There is little compassion or regard for any basic human rights, and if anything, we can hear fear, hatred, and using words that make the immigrant into someone not quite human. Listen to Romney, for instance, and you'll hear the word "alien" used often, almost as if these people coming across our border from Mexico (or anywhere else) may as well be little green men from Mars.

 

Although these are the people who say they take the Bible seriously, and even literally, there is little discussion about Biblical precepts, unless it seems to serve their purpose. Although this is a complex issue in terms of what actions to take, it doesn't take much to hear that there are many negative attitudes toward the immigrant. Much of the rhetoric has attitudes of fear, defense and protection – rather than any sense of basic human rights. But any discussion of what actions need to be taken must begin with a discussion of what attitudes are behind our actions and why those attitudes exist. We might notice, for instance, that we're far more willing to welcome the northern European immigrant than the person from the Middle-East. We seem more willing to welcome the Hispanic from Spain, than the Hispanic from Mexico or El Salvador. Could some of our immigration policy be based on racist attitudes? Probably.

 

And what does the Bible have to say about this problem? Quite a lot.

 

We are to love the stranger (Deut. 10) and not to oppress the alien (Exodus 23). We are led to action through the Social Gospel, that asks us to set at liberty those who are oppressed (Luke 4) and to feed the hungry, give water to the thirsty, clothe the naked, and welcome the stranger (Matthew 25). We are to do these actions to the least of us. If we believe this, what public policy might result? Should our Christian beliefs be part of our public policy at all? If a candidate says it should be, then that candidate has to take these passages seriously.

 

There are many problems that need to be addressed when we look at immigration. We can look at the roots of the problem of immigration – why do people want to come to the U.S. and leave their country? Usually it's because of the oppression of the countries that force their citizens to flee in order to feed and clothe their children, and our own country's use and abuse of the immigrants in order to keep up our own standard of living through the labor of the poor. Although we might say we'd like all the immigrants to leave, our standard of living is dependent upon them being here.

 

This means the problem has to be addressed through many avenues because of its complexity. Dennis Kucinich says "there are no illegal people". Many would affirm fair treatment for everyone, that the stranger is not forgotten and further oppressed. We try to balance fair treatment for those within our country with fair treatment for those coming to our country. And we need to try to separate fact from fiction about fairness.

 

We need to decide, as a democratic country, to what extent do we believe that there are basic human rights – that should be available to everyone, regardless of where they live. This means struggling with whether, or not, we should provide education, health care, and any democratic rights to those who are not citizens of our country. Personally, I believe there are some basic human rights that should transcend borders.

 

During the last seven years, many of our basic democratic rights have been taken away from our citizens, as well as from non-citizens. We need to decide if human rights are basic – and inalienable – or whether they just belong to those who happen to be favored by our current government. And if human rights cost us, do we prefer to put our money into protecting and affirming rights, or into the billions spent for corruption and war?

Featured Writers

Previous Post



December 19, 2007

President Huckabee: "No Room in the Inn"

Next Post



December 25, 2007 When God Answers a Prayer


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What kind of animal swallowed Jonah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A lion A great fish A serpent A camel

Related posts from Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

King, Isaiah, and the Politics of Now

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Stone Soup for the Soul: An Intern’s Lesson...

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Secret Confessions from the GOP Nominee: A Response

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Two American Dreams and One Economic Reality

Faithful Democrats

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Gas Prices: What Would Jesus Pay?

Many of my conservative Christian friends have been having a field day...

Jesus Was a Social Deviant: A Brief History...

  Americans like to say that this country was founded on the...

On Max Lucado Preaching At Washington National Cathedral

There has been a bit of controversy over the past week about...

Digital Deception: How We Ended Up Here And...

The American experiment has reached its moment of reckoning, and we seem...

“The evangelical vote is more diverse than you...

Rev. Jim Ball, EFB Co-Chair, is one of the voices featured in...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube