Governor, you are no Jack Kennedy

Last updated on: August 16, 2012 at 3:23 pm by Eric Sapp

Governor, you are no Jack Kennedy 2012-08-16T15:23:24-06:00 Eric Sapp

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Don’t get me wrong, it was a good speech (you can read the transcript here) and well-delivered. I have no doubt that much of the mainstream media will be speaking highly about it because it appealed to their sensibilities and was quite reasonable. Democrats will also likely see much merit in the speech, and rightly so. It was a speech many a Democrat could have delivered and would have been very effective in a general election…but therein lies the problem. This isn’t the general election, and the reason Romney was forced to give this speech was not because moderates and progressive-leaning voters couldn’t stomach his Mormonism.

He was forced to make “a personal decision” to do what he had repeatedly said he would not and deliver the speech because he’s having a serious problem with evangelicals and other religious conservatives, especially in Iowa.

But unlike Kennedy a half-century ago, Romney isn’t facing the concern that a single Pope will rule Washington (I doubt 1 in 10 Americans could even tell you how the hierarchy of the LDS is set up), so his assurances that authorities in his church (or any other) will not exert influence on presidential decisions doesn’t really matter. Let’s be straight up. The concern with Mormonism–especially from the Republican base who will decide the primaries–is that its members are part of a cult. It’s not a concern about Mormon influence on policies because the Mormons are pretty much in lock-step on the issues with the religious right. The concern is with someone who doesn’t believe in the “right Jesus” but still claims to be Christian and within the theological tradition of the Church.

That problem will still exist after this speech because he did very little to counter all the anti-Mormon stereotypes…and I’m not sure how he could have done so. Another problem is that he gave his detractors several new things to start hitting him on. His assurances “that no authorities of my church, or of any other church for that matter, will ever exert influence on presidential decisions” is either a flat out lie or something that will be quite disquieting to all the religious right leaders he is courting who definitely expect some access to the Oval Office if their guy becomes president…I mean, come on. Whether a religious group or not, you don’t spend tens of millions of dollars helping someone get elected and then accept the fact that you will have no influence over his decisions once he’s in office…

Second, his opponents are going to have a field day with the line: “Americans tire of those who would jettison their beliefs, even to gain the world.” Everyone knows Romney’s been changing his positions on a bunch of key issues (and beliefs) as politics dictated. Maybe there was a true conversion every time. I don’t know. But I do know that voters, especially on the right, have their doubts. To play the martyr now about how he understands the importance of holding to his convictions no matter the political consequence is all well and good, but there are going to be a lot of folks who point to his flip-flopping on abortion, taxes, gays, etc as the political winds changed…and that undermines the admirable “damn the world, I’m sticking to my beliefs” argument he made yesterday.

Overall, this discussion is somewhat of an academic exercise for faithful democrats. Romney is still a very bad choice for president, and we won’t be voting in his primary. But I’ll close with this. While I don’t think this speech will help him a whole lot in his primary, I’m glad he gave it. As I said at the beginning, it was a speech a Democrat could have given. His supporters (even those on the right) will fight desperately to defend and validate it. And that moves this American discourse on faith in the public square in a positive direction.

Featured Writers

Previous Post

December 3, 2007

Killing Our Enemies in Christ's Name

Next Post

December 10, 2007 Huckabee: Jesus is His Co-Pilot

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus use to feed the 5,000?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Grapes and figs Manna from heaven Five loaves and two fish A basket of quail