Words vs. Deeds on Health Care

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:09 am by Faithful Democrats

Words vs. Deeds on Health Care 2013-05-09T06:09:36-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The words vs. deeds debate continues, this time on health care.

Today, the New York Times’s Robin Toner purports to show the differences between Democratic and Republican presidential candidates on the issue. He frames the topic in the familiar way: Republicans want to “empower consumers to buy it themselves, from private insurers,” while Democrats, in seeking to “strengthen the private-employer based system,” envision “a strong role for government…with substantial new government spending to subsidize coverage for people who cannot afford it.”

If we’re just looking at the candidates’ proposals — their words — Toner’s frame is fine. I have serious doubts about how much empowerment the Republican proposals would actually provide, but Toner is boiling down the rhetoric of the two sides fairly accurately.

The problem comes in Toner’s uncritical assertion that, while Democrats and Republicans “argue over solutions, both parties acknowledge the problems and their political urgency.”

Toner forgets that “both sides” have acknowledged the urgency of the health care problem for a long time — but only one side has tried to do anything about it.

In the 1992 campaign, both Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush had substantive health care proposals. Clinton’s plan guaranteed universal insurance coverage; Bush’s plan offered (among other things) a decently-sized health-insurance tax credit for low-income families.

Bush, of course, had not done anything in his term to promote health care. But Clinton, within a year of being elected in 1992, proposed and sought to pass a universal health care bill. He failed, of course — infamously so — due largely to the opposition of the health insurance industry and thus (by definition) the Republican Party. But he tried.

Fast forward to the 2000 presidential campaign. Again, each party’s candidate had a health care plan. This time the proposals were scaled down, mostly because of the political fallout of Clinton’s failure. Gore pushed for a strong patients’ bill of rights, expansion of Medicare to children, prescription drug coverage for seniors, and a gradual move toward universal coverage. Bush, favoring less government intervention, nevertheless insisted he would be more effective on health care: “The difference is I can get it done [referring specifically to a patients’ bill of rights]. I can get something positive done on behalf of the people. That’s what the question in this campaign is about.”

When Bush wound up in the White House, he took approximately zero steps to “get it done” on a patients’ bill of rights or much else on health care. He did pass a massive handout for drug and insurance companies under the guise of helping seniors. But Bush didn’t bother giving even a semblance of help to the vast majority of the population.

So we have a tale of three presidents. The first Bush did nothing for an entire term, then claimed to care about health care once an election was approaching. Clinton made a good faith effort that was thwarted by Republicans. And the second Bush promised to “get it done” and, once in office, broke the promise.

As we go through the same rigmarole in 2008, I hope that voters will remember 1 John 3:17-18: “But whoever has the world’s goods, and beholds his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him? Little children, let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth.”

Featured Writers

Previous Post

July 4, 2007

A Christian/Islamic Theology

Next Post

July 10, 2007 Fear-Mongering Faith in Public Life

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the only female judge of Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Deborah Ruth Esther Hannah