Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Faithful Democrats

Home
Politics and Religion
A Christian/Islamic Theology

A Christian/Islamic Theology

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:09 am by Faithful Democrats

A Christian/Islamic Theology 2013-05-09T06:09:37-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

For those of you who missed it, I've been having an epic debate with Mark, of Faithful Democrats on this very topic. Since we seem to have been cut short, before we reached a decision, I've decided to continue the discussion in another blog.

For those interested in our first round of debate, you can find this in the comments section of Tolerance or Mush?

Now before I continue, I would like to say that I respect your opinion Mark. You take a theological stance that all truth is derived from scriptural evidence. This is by its nature a logically consistent view. It can be traced back, and discussed in a rational manner, and this furthers the concept of truth. Now I respectfully disagree with your opinion, because I think that you have allowed religous Dogma to devaluate your stance. In essence, you have argued against Post-Modernism, and in so doing, you have fallen into a post-modernist trap of deconstructing your own argument. (This is a topic I have discussed in greater detail, in the post The Fallacies of Neo-Conservatism)

Anyways, to the topic at hand.

I think that your over-all point is that two conflicting opinions cannot both be true.

This is a metaphysical proposition of logic, as such I will answer this with logic. When dealing with the truth of an argument, the question is whether the argument is consistent within itself. If so, then it is considered to be true. Thus if Islam creates a series of metaphysical propositions that are consistent, it is considered to be true. If Christianity does the same, it is likewise considered to be true. Hence Islam and Christianity can both be true.

Now if we are attempting to create a consistent theology between the two, this becomes somewhat problematic, since many Christians hold to the divinity of Christ. In contrast, Islam holds that there is one God, and that to deify a man is Idolatry.

The trinity actually makes a good compromise. In this, By worshiping God, one worships Christ by default, and hence no Idolatry is commited. (and vice-versa)

Now further, I should add that Paul makes the argument in Romans 5:18

"Therefore as by the the offense of one, judgment came upon all men to condemnation, even so by righteousness of one, the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life"

To this, Imrans 3:59 (of the Koran states) This revelation, and this wise admonition, we recite to you. Jesus is like Adam in the sight of God. He created him of dust and then said to him: be and he was.

So between these two statements I think a consistent theology could be formulated between the two religions, with an emphasis as Christ our saviour.

I'd also like to add on another note, a given pretext for non-violent Jihad.

Inram 3:21 "To Those who have recieved the scripture and to the Gentiles say: 'Will you surrender yourselves to God? If they shall become Muslims they shall be rightly guided; if they give no heed, then your only duty is to warn them. God is watching all his servants."

In response to the Islamic extremist, who uphold violent Jihad, I would argue:

"There are some among them who twist their tongues when quoting scriptures, so that you may think they are quoting from the scriptures, where-as it is not from the scriptures. Thus they say: "This is from God,' where-as it is not from God. Thus they knowingly ascribe a falsehood to God." Imran 3 : 78

Now I admit, there is some support for violence in the name of God in the Koran. However, the argument follows that dying in the Name of God is righteous, and that the followers of Islam should not retreat from battle. This should be considered a justification for the defense of Islam, and not for the violent application of the religion. Hence if Christians follow the teachings of Christ, and turn the other Cheek, the supporters of violent Jihad, by application of their scripture, violate its sancticty by by engaging in warfare with a non-violent ideology.

I mention this, because this argument is our best defense against terrorism.

I would finally add some other thoughts from the Koran

"This is a declaration to mankind:a guide and an adomonition to the righteous Take heart and do not despair. Have faith and you will triumph." Imran 3:139

At any rate, this is an important discussion, as I would evidence from the article We cannot afford to maintain these ancient prejudices against Islam .

I've also posted this blog in Street Prophets to see an expanded dialogue on the topic.

Kozzmo

Reader Blogs

Previous Post

July 4, 2007

Freedom Means Love

Next Post

July 6, 2007 Words vs. Deeds on Health Care

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book follows Proverbs in the Old Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalms Song of Solomon Isaiah Ecclesiastes