Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Faithful Democrats

Questions for Rob Schenck

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:09 am   by Faithful Democrats

Questions for Rob Schenck 2013-05-09T06:09:41-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Rev. Rob Schenck of the National Clergy Council leveled below-the-belt broadsides against the leading Democratic presidential candidates after their faith-focused forum last week.  He kept to the passé script about abortion and homosexuality being litmus test issues.  I called Rev. Schenck’s press contact, Dane Rose, to ask for clarification on these attacks.  Predictably, I never heard back.

 

Here are the questions I was going to ask Rev. Schenck (or his handler) if he were willing to engage someone who views the Bible very differently than he does.

 

1) Rev. Schenck, you called the Sojourners-sponsored debate “a sham, a fraud, and a travesty” — a “carefully scripted public relations effort to promote liberal political positions disguised as deeply held religious beliefs.”  This forum, you said, revealed “cynicism and sophistry.”   What inside information do you have suggesting that the religious views expressed by the candidates were insincere?  Or do you share God’s ability to see into people’s hearts?

2)  You wrote that if Sojourners and its supporters “accepted the Bible in its totality as the inerrant Word of God,” they “would not provide advocates of abortion and same-sex unions a platform to espouse their views about faith and values.”  You claim that your positions on these issues are “unequivocally expressed in the Bible.”  If these issues are so clear that they alone require litmus-test treatment, then:

– Where specifically in the Bible is abortion condemned?  And how do you reconcile the passages saying that God knew us in our mothers’ womb with the ones suggesting a fetus has lower legal value than a born person?  Isn’t there some room for interpretation, here?

–  What in the Bible suggests that homosexuality is worse than other behaviors such as divorce, gossiping, pre-marital sex, failure to give to charity, etc., that virtually no one thinks should be legally banned or deprive people of equal rights under the law?

3) If you are serious that Christians shouldn’t give anti-biblical candidates “a platform to espouse their views about faith and values,” why do you not criticize conservative Christian groups that host divorced, adulterous politicians like Rudy Giuliani, Newt Gingrich, and the late Ronald Reagan?  

4) You lament that Sojourners “would replace Christian charity with governmental redistribution of wealth.”   In a world where there are structural reasons for poverty and oppression — as Isaiah pointed out when he decried “unjust laws” that “deprive the poor of their rights” — is it really good enough to put a band-aid on social problems instead of attacking their roots?  Don’t Christians have responsibilities both as private individuals and as citizens?

5) If following Scripture is supposed to be voluntary when it comes to fighting poverty — with justice dependent entirely on “Christian charity” — why do you want the federal government to prohibit abortion and same-sex unions?

6) “At the Day of Judgment,” you write, “God will divide the righteous from the wicked” — suggesting that God’s criteria involve abortion and homosexuality.  But Matthew 25:34-45 says that wicked and righteous nations (not individuals, mind you, but nations) will be judged on how they treated “the least of these” in society: the hungry, the naked, the stranger, the imprisoned, and the sick.  Why do you focus on gays and abortion, when Matthew says God’s criteria involve precisely the issues that progressives tend to emphasize?

I’m going to keep trying Rev. Schenck’s office; maybe he’ll provide us with some enlightening answers one of these days. 

Featured Writers

Previous Post



June 7, 2007

The Latest: March 2007 Archive

Next Post



June 9, 2007 "People of the Snowmobile" Bemoan Loss of Moral Values


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the Hebrew word 'El Shaddai' mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Everlasting Father Holy One The Lord is my Shepherd God

Related posts from Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

King, Isaiah, and the Politics of Now

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Stone Soup for the Soul: An Intern’s Lesson...

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Secret Confessions from the GOP Nominee: A Response

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Two American Dreams and One Economic Reality

Faithful Democrats

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Gas Prices: What Would Jesus Pay?

Many of my conservative Christian friends have been having a field day...

Jesus Was a Social Deviant: A Brief History...

  Americans like to say that this country was founded on the...

On Max Lucado Preaching At Washington National Cathedral

There has been a bit of controversy over the past week about...

Digital Deception: How We Ended Up Here And...

The American experiment has reached its moment of reckoning, and we seem...

“The evangelical vote is more diverse than you...

Rev. Jim Ball, EFB Co-Chair, is one of the voices featured in...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube