Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Faithful Democrats

Moral Moments in the Democratic Debate

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:09 am   by Faithful Democrats

Moral Moments in the Democratic Debate 2013-05-09T06:09:43-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There was no direct talk of religious faith in last night’s Democratic presidential debate in New Hampshire.  But there was talk of honesty, courage, and moral leadership — attributes for which voters sometimes use faith as a proxy.

 

John Edwards emphasized not just his current anti-war stance, but his willingness to admit he was wrong to vote to authorize the war in 2002: “It is important for anybody who seeks to be the next president of the United States, given the dishonesty that we’ve been faced with over the last several years, to be honest to the country.”  That was a slap at Hillary Clinton.

 

Joe Biden pushed integrity in a different way, arguing we must be honest that Congress can’t cut off funding for the Iraq war without enough votes to override a presidential veto.  “You need 67 votes to end this war. I love these guys who tell you they’re going to stop the war.” That was a slap at John Edwards, Dennis Kucinich, and Mike Gravel — and to some extent the frontrunners, Clinton and Barack Obama, who voted against funding the Iraq war.

 

Kucinich and Gravel — the lefties of the bunch — had their own idea of honesty: Democrats should face up to their culpability for authorizing and enabling the Iraq war.  That was a slap at almost everyone else on stage.

 

John Edwards, seeking to improve his flagging poll numbers, sought to show that he was a leader against the war — not someone who, like Clinton and Obama, would go “quietly to the floor of the Senate” to vote against the recent bill to fund the Iraq war.  “The job of the president,” Edwards said, “is not to legislate, but to lead.”  Edwards has a point, there.  And no matter what 10-point plans a president has, the bully pulpit is really where presidents make or break their legacies.

 

Obama was the first one to use something like religious language when he called veterans’ health care a “sacred obligation.”

 

The moral debate heated up, though, when the issue of Darfur arose.  Joe Biden was perhaps the most vehement on the issue, temperamentally at least, arguing that the government of Sudan forfeited its sovereignty when it decided to commit genocide.  He said NATO could take out the janjaweed tomorrow — but we need to stop talking and start acting.  While we talk, “another 50,000 people will be dead!” he shouted, with some old-fashioned, finger-wagging, moral indignation.

 

Richardson was even more blunt: “America should care about Africa and we don’t.”

 

Edwards tied Darfur into the bigger issue that America no longer has the moral authority to lead.  We should be doing more in Africa not only on Darfur, but also on HIV-AIDS and education.  Obama broadened the issue still further, insisting that the U.S.’s legitimacy as a world actor is compromised by our human rights abuses at Guantanamo and revocation of habeus corpus for accused terrorists.

 

On the budget, Chris Dodd said our fiscal policy should reflect our “moral values” — echoing the often-used line of religious progressives that a “budget is a moral document.”

 

A funny moment for me came when Hillary Clinton said we had to focus like the “proverbial laser” on Pakistan’s anti-terror record — using air quotation marks in a manner reminiscent of Dr. Evil describing a sophisticated heat beam from the 1960s called a “laser.”

 

The particulars aside, I’ve got to say: I’m liking this crop of candidates.  They look sharp.  When the general election comes around, we’ll likely be in good hands, whoever wins the primary.  I don’t mean to sound like a DNC press release.  But I’m telling you: almost all of these candidates have something compelling about them — Edwards’s conviction, Clinton’s practicality, Obama’s calm command, Bill Richardson’s deep experience, Biden’s passion…and so it goes. 

 

I’m glad I’m not taking sides in the primary.  For the time being, I’m digging just admiring these folks.

Featured Writers

Previous Post



May 31, 2007

Rise of the Neo-Evangelical in American Politics

Next Post



June 5, 2007 A Groundbreaking Forum on Faith


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian tradition is associated with the seven sacraments?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Protestantism Quakerism Seventh-day Adventism Roman Catholicism

Related posts from Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

King, Isaiah, and the Politics of Now

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Stone Soup for the Soul: An Intern’s Lesson...

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Secret Confessions from the GOP Nominee: A Response

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Two American Dreams and One Economic Reality

Faithful Democrats

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Gas Prices: What Would Jesus Pay?

Many of my conservative Christian friends have been having a field day...

Jesus Was a Social Deviant: A Brief History...

  Americans like to say that this country was founded on the...

On Max Lucado Preaching At Washington National Cathedral

There has been a bit of controversy over the past week about...

Digital Deception: How We Ended Up Here And...

The American experiment has reached its moment of reckoning, and we seem...

“The evangelical vote is more diverse than you...

Rev. Jim Ball, EFB Co-Chair, is one of the voices featured in...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube