Global Warming Kills

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:09 am by Faithful Democrats

Global Warming Kills 2013-05-09T06:09:39-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is blood-boiling stuff.

A World Health Organization (WHO) study says that 77,000 people are already dying every year in Asia and the Pacific as a direct or indirect result of climate change. That’s not a hypothetical number; that’s the current state of affairs.

Why so many deaths? The WHO cites the “increasing frequency of summer heat waves in temperate zones, and typhoons, hurricanes and floods throughout the world.”

Down the line, the death toll is bound to rise as rainfall is reduced and disease-carrying mosquitoes appear in new areas.

Meanwhile, the Bush administration continues to exacerbate the problem instead of lifting a finger to solve it. In a recent Harper’s, Bill McKibben gives the following assessment of Bush’s abysmal record on climate change:

Bush came into office promising that he would require U.S. power plants to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions, and if he’d stuck to the plan, our country would already look quite different. Solar panels would have begun to sprout in real numbers, cars would be smaller, we’d be building more passenger trains. Instead, Bush repudiated the promise within a few weeks of taking office. He said he didn’t want to do anything that would raise the price of energy. His energy task force, chaired by Dick Cheney, barely even mentioned the possibility of global warming. It concentrated on new places to find fossil fuel, new pipelines to carry it, new refineries to refine it — and indeed, just as Cheney suggested, there are about 159 new coal-fired power plants in some stage of planning or construction around the country. Meanwhile, carbon-dioxide output has increased an average of 1.6 percent every year — and the average price for a gallon of gas has nearly doubled.

But Bush’s folly at home isn’t the worst of it. As soon as he took office, he also repudiated America’s participation in the Kyoto treaty process, the one international attempt to begin reining in carbon emissions. And he did it at the critical moment when China and India were just beginning their rapid energy takeoffs. It’s possible that this is what history will judge Bush most sternly for, even more than the Iraq war. With real effort and real resources, we might have nudged the emerging economies onto a different energy trajectory in 2000, but by now their path appears set. Plans call for some 600 new coal-fired plants in China and India alone; the Chinese open a new plant every week.

The blood of those 77,000 people a year is therefore on Bush’s hands. Indeed, it’s on the hands of every one of our national leaders — Republican or Democrat — who has sat idly by as the environmental wreckage has mounted.

No more excuses are acceptable. No more delays. No more hand-wringing about the “cost” of action. The cost of inaction is plenty high.

Update: A new Pew survey shows that as the U.S.’s image remains in decline around the world, concern about climate change as the “top global threat” is rising.

Featured Writers

Previous Post

June 26, 2007

Some Thoughts on Bobby Cutts

Next Post

June 29, 2007 Rudy Guliani

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "To the pure, all things are pure"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

James Paul Peter John