Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Faithful Democrats

Home
Politics and Religion
George Washington Against “Christian Zionism”

George Washington Against “Christian Zionism”

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:09 am by Faithful Democrats

George Washington Against “Christian Zionism” 2013-05-09T06:09:56-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Real patriots, by Washington's reckoning, may well be those
people of reason who stand up against the racket in the public square.

In its "merger" with or "takeover" of the Republican Party,
the Evangelical Christian Right has made no secret of its nationalistic
agenda: returning America to its "Christian roots" and setting the
stage in the Middle East to jumpstart the return of Jesus…

Such luminaries as Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and, most
recently, John Hagee view the world as in two camps — good and
evil….The "good" people are born-again Christians and
religious Jews in Israel (for the moment, at least)… The "evil"
people are Evangelicals who might vote Democrat, Democrats,
non-Orthodox Jews, liberals of all stripes and everyone else…

The practice of stereotyping nations as good or evil because
of the religious beliefs of its citizens threatens to destroy the great
American experiment and thrust the world into chaos … Nevertheless,
this practice is showing signs of resonating with our nation's leaders,
particularly within the Executive branch…

George Washington, arguably the most effective of the
"Founding Fathers," offered in his farewell address a few thoughts on
the dangers of ideological ties or antipathies with any nation … His
thoughts will be applied in this essay to the dangerous and selfish
aims of Christian Zionists in their insistence on substituting land for
national sovereignty…

Observe good faith and justice toward all Nations; cultivate
peace and harmony with all … Religion and Morality enjoin this
conduct…"

It was good faith and justice that became the springboard
for the 1947 UN Resolution of statehood for the Jewish people. On the
heels of one of the most heinous crimes in human history — the
attempted annihilation of European Jews by the Nationalist Right and
the pogroms by the Soviet Left, good faith and justice demanded that
Jews all over the world be granted a homeland of choice.

The Six-Day War in 1967 changed the dynamics in the region. The State of Israel's victory was understood as theological 'sign'
in the "end time" tradition of many Evangelicals.

The Christian Right in America seized on this opportunity to
declare the territories Israel captured as God's promise to Abraham.
Its influence over American foreign policy is more far reaching than is
understood by the American public, being heavily augmented by the
bipartisan lobbying activities of the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC).

President Washington urged our new nation to maintain an
objectivity that would permit us to mete out good faith and justice
toward the citizens of all nations. Having long ago lost that
objectivity in its favoritism toward Israel, America now finds itself
in a position of defending from afar the actions of the Israeli
government.

Christian Zionists have joined the fray by funding the West
Bank settlements of Jews and declaring the borders that Israel occupied
as a result of the 1967 war as God-ordained. In that regard and in
others, they have challenged their own premise of adhering to the
intent of the founding fathers by ignoring Washington's plea for
"religion and morality to enjoin" the conduct of good faith and
justice.

"Nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate
antipathies against particular Nations, and passionate attachments for
others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and
amicable feelings toward all should be cultivated…The Nation, which
indulges towards another an habitual hatred, or an habitual fondness,
is in some degree a slave…"

The War in Iraq, fully supported by the Christian Right and
justified on the specious grounds of Weapons of Mass Destruction,
reflected an "inveterate antipathy" against Iraq. That "inveterate
antipathy" encompasses other nations in the region, notably Iran and
Syria. Christian Zionists are now openly calling for an invasion of
Iran.

The fondness that America showed in past years for the Saddam
Hussein regime in Iraq as a stabilizing influence in the region after
the Iran Hostage Crisis is lost on the American people. Lost, as well,
is the history of the American government in propping up the Taliban to
push back the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. In both cases, a habitual
fondness evolved into habitual hatred, making us, "in some degree a
slave."

Al-Qaeda, the alliance of Sunni Islamist terrorist
organizations, was funded largely by patrons in Saudi Arabia, an
oil-rich nation for whom the United States has exhibited a habitual
fondness, making us slaves not only to Saudi Arabia but to fossil
fuels.

"A passionate attachment of one Nation for another…gives
to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to
the favorite nation) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of
their own country…"

In this case, the "ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens"
are those who have elevated the words of the Bible, taken out of
context, over justice and mercy demanded by the "Word" of both
Testaments in the Bible. These words, cleverly crafted into a legal
mandate and dispersed of late as best-selling 'end-of-days rapture'
books, became superior in their legal standing to the very Constitution
written by the Founding Fathers venerated by the same Christian Right
that sees in Israel the end of history.

For the Christian Zionist, God's blessing on America depends,
not on its fairness, its faithfulness nor its dedication to truth and
justice. Instead, His blessing is contingent, one-on-one, to America's
commitment to the borders of Israel secured in the 1967 War.

The remarkable irony of this posture is that all this, in the
Christian Zionist's theology, will hasten a Middle East Armageddon,
trigger the Second Coming of Christ and rescue properly born-again
Christians and Christ-accepting Jews while annihilating all others,
including non-believing Americans.

One can come to no other conclusion, then, that the Christian
Zionists are out to sacrifice the interests of their own country to a
less-than two-hundred year old eschatology, or study of last things.

"Such (passionate) attachments are particularly alarming to
the independent Patriot…They tamper with domestic factions, to
practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence
or awe the Public Councils…"

True patriotism being the professed agenda of the Christian
Right, such activities as we have noted in their devotion to profiling
good and evil peoples ought to be, according to Washington, "alarming
to the independent Patriot."

Through the vehicle of the media and under the protection of
freedom of speech and religious expression, the Christian Right and its
political action committee, the Republican Party, has indeed tampered
with domestic factions, practiced the arts of seduction and awed the
Public Councils.

The American people, assuming that such anomalies as the 50's
Communist witch hunts and the blandishments of the Patriot Act, are
temporary and will fade in the next Administration, ought to be alarmed
as it witnesses the Democratic Party cozying up to the megachurches.

The Christian Zionist influence over both domestic and foreign policy is widespread and endemic.

"Real patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite,
are liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes
usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their
interests…"

Those Evangelicals and mainline Protestants and Catholics who
stand true to their faith but brook no affiliation with the Republican
Party are branded as "not real Christians." As such, they, along with
non-believing Jews, are destined to become cannon fodder at Armageddon
or its aftermath. Republicans who fail to believe in the theocratic
agenda of the Christian Right are branded RINO's, Republican's in Name
Only.

Real patriots, by Washington's reckoning, may well be those
people of reason who stand up against the racket in the public square.

"The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign
nations, is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them
as little political connection as possible…So far as we have already
formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here
let us stop…

It may be too late, Mr. President.

*Dr. Stan Moody, an evangelical Baptist minister and founder of the Christian Policy Institute, is the author of McChurched: 300 Million Served and Still Hungry and of these earlier essays for JewsOnFirst.org: Slouching Toward Armageddon; Dr. Dobson and Free Speech: Does God Need a Lobbyist?

Featured Writers

Previous Post

May 1, 2007

On the Turning Away

Next Post

May 3, 2007 The Latest: February 2007 Archive

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Israel ask Samuel for despite his warnings?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A new Tabernacle A prophet A palace A king