A Mother’s Right to Choose

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:09 am by Faithful Democrats

A Mother’s Right to Choose 2013-05-09T06:09:49-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The cult of individuality is an insidious virus that leaves us stranded
and alone.

So much focus has been directed toward individual rights to
make independent choices that I sometimes wonder if we ought not spend a little
more time on the global consequences of those choices.

When you think about it, the key issues of the past half
century have been about choice — insistence on the part of the left to be free
to do anything, and resistance on the part of the right to offer choice to those
who are different.

I recently participated in a rather left-leaning public
forum in Central Maine on some key social
issues. Among those were abortion and
minimum wage. It was an opportunity to
challenge popular thinking.

On hiking the minimum wage, I called it a coward's economic
development program that hurts struggling Mom and Pop businesses that have been
the backbone of the Maine
way of life. Raise the minimum wage as
high as you wish, but bundle with it a program to assist small businesses to
compete with the big box stores in the form of low interest loans and tax
relief. In that way, everybody wins —
especially the economy of the State of Maine.

On abortion, often referred to as "a woman's right to
choose," I declared myself to be pro-life but had, as a legislator, voted
mostly pro-choice because of an oath of office to uphold the Constitution of
the United States.

The common theme of both issues is that, while we have
almost unlimited political and personal choice in this great nation of ours,
choice is not made in a vacuum. All of
our choices affect the human family in which we live. In the same way a hike in minimum wage hurts
the ability of struggling Mom and Pop's to succeed, so the choice to abort
often carries with it isolation from the social fabric that binds our lives.

As I watch Rudy Guiliani twist in the wind trying to appeal
to a right-wing caucus for the Presidential nomination, I am impressed by his courage. Rudy is in deep trouble for his pro-choice
stance, even though he considers abortion to be immoral. Mitt Romney, on the other hand, has altered
his stance on abortion as an appeal to a faction within his party that condemns
him because they consider his religion, Mormonism, to be a cult. Stick a fork in Mitt.

I want to yell, "Rudy, it is not about a woman's right to choose; it is about a mother's right to choose." That puts the choice on a more global level,
does it not? That brings to the table
the idea promoted by Bill Clinton, who exercised his own selfish and destructive
form of choice, that abortion ought to be legal but rare. When put into the context of motherhood, consideration
of a possible tear in the social fabric becomes a factor in the choice.

The cult of individuality is, I believe, creating a void in
political leadership that often bases its own choices on perception rather than
on principle. That explains why we put
bandaids on programs rather than create ones that work. Tax reform becomes targeted tax relief. Economic development becomes hiking the
minimum wage. Education reform becomes
"Let them have lap-tops!"

Politicians are unwitting servants of a culture that values individual
beliefs and desires over the common good.

The decision by a public servant to choose a particular
interpretation of the Bible over the Constitution tears at the very freedom of
worship and expression that permits such choices. The decision by a public servant to choose
individual rights over the impact of those rights on the human family dooms all
three – the public servant to a colossal waste of time, the individual to
further isolation and the human family to irreparable injury.

We have become the product of our politics — individuals
screaming about high taxes, oppressive government, limited choices and the failure
of our dreams. One might conclude that
the failure of our dreams is the chicken that has evolved from the egg.

The failure of forward-looking policy; the deterioration of
our infrastructure (roads, bridges, education, health care, access to information
and services); blind focus on wedge issues over the pride of progress are the products
of decades of little choices made by us all.

The cult of individuality is an insidious virus that leaves us stranded
and alone.

The results of those choices cannot be changed with a bill
before the State Legislature or the Congress of the United States.

Change must come from within.

Stan Moody is the author of "Crisis in Evangelical Scholarship" and
"McChurched: 300 Million Served and Still Hungry

Featured Writers

Previous Post

May 13, 2007

Save Our Troops!

Next Post

May 15, 2007 Death of an Adversary

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who played cymbals in Temple worship?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Solomon David Moses Asaph