Jesus, Howard Dean, and the Easter Bunny

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:09 am by Faithful Democrats

Jesus, Howard Dean, and the Easter Bunny 2013-05-09T06:09:59-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Some evangelicals are claiming that DNC Chair Howard Dean's failure to mention

the resurrection of Jesus in his Easter statement shows that Democrats are just plain incompetent in
their message to Evangelicals. This is utter nonsense. But
the attack on Dean reveals a lot.

What do Howard Dean, the Easter
Bunny, and the Republican message machine all have in common?
No, it isn’t the opening line to a bad joke. Or maybe it is.

As a Christian ethicist who
tries to help Democrats understand religion better, I was intrigued
and frustrated recently when a friend sent me an article by Nathan Gonzales
that circulated on the Internet chastising Governor Howard Dean on his
Easter statement. The author took umbrage when Dean did not mention
the resurrection of Jesus in his Easter greeting and by this omission
demonstrated yet again that Democrats are just plain incompetent in
their message to Evangelicals. This is utter nonsense. But
the attack on Dean reveals a lot.

The timing of this jeremiad
against Dean is curious. Just a few days earlier he gave a successful
speech at Eastern University, a flagship Evangelical college in Philadelphia.
Tony Campolo, a superstar in the Evangelical world and an emeritus professor
there, had invited Dean. He got a warm reception and spoke directly
to a set of moral concerns shared by the Democratic Party and many Evangelicals.
The swiftness of the subsequent assault smells like Republicans fear
at the inroads Democrats are making in the Evangelical world.

Gonzales turned to Rich Cizik,
Vice President of Government Affairs for the National Association of
Evangelicals for the kill quote. Cizik said, “This press release,
absent any reference to Jesus, without whom the Easter resurrection
story is meaningless, is apparently a sad reflection of a ‘lowest
common denominator’ religious outreach of the Democratic party.
Wake up and smell the Easter lilies! This kind of outreach will not
pass the smell test of any evangelical.”

Cizik, who recently dodged
getting fired from his NAE position because a number of the Grand Viziers
of the Religious Right felt he was drifting dangerously left for his
work on global warming and poverty, took the obligatory cheap shot at
Dean, no doubt in an attempt to buttress his bona fides with the Religious
Right. He missed the fact that Dean is not clergy or a theologian,
and the Democratic National Committee is not a church! Dean should
not be held to an arbitrary unwritten creed dictated by a curmudgeonly
religious lobbyist. He and the DNC can issue Easter greetings
in any form they want. That they chose Hallmark and not
Karl Barth as the form of the message means nothing ominous.

But what about the substance
of the charge that Dean bent over backwards to avoid mentioning Jesus
when he said Easter Sunday was a joyous celebration representing peace,
redemption and renewal? I took a look at the two White House statements
issued around Easter. On Good Friday the White House issued a
typical ghost written blurb addressed only to Christians. While
it noted the resurrection of Jesus is the most important event of the
Christian faith, it quickly linked the holiday to praying for our soldiers.
That’s a theological stretch to put it mildly, connecting the death
and resurrection of the Prince of Peace with the war in Iraq.
But on Easter itself, the President gave a short statement after attending
services at Fort Hood, Texas, making no mention of Jesus or the resurrection
saying simply that this is a joyous day for many people around the world
and it was a day for us to reflect on our many blessings. So in
his generic Easter he sounded similar to Dean. Where is the Evangelical
outrage?

We are at such a low point
in our political discourse when polemicists can read ceremonial statements
from politicians and use them as the basis for personal attacks.
Both Dean and the president issued typical Easter statements.
As a Christian theologian I believe Easter is precisely about peace,
redemption, and renewal as Dean said. Faithful politicians do
not have to tell their whole theological creed every time they address
religion. Cizik is a genuinely nice guy and I hate to see he and
his organization dragged into cheap partisan politics over this statement.

The real story in this kerflufle
is that millions of Evangelicals already vote Democratic and more of
them will do so in 2008. This terrifies the Republican establishment
and the elites of the Religious Right. In the last few months
John Kerry spoke at Pepperdine University, Hillary Rodham Clinton spoke
at the Sojourners Pentecost gathering, and Barack Obama spoke at Saddleback
Church at the invitation of Pastor Rick Warren. All got great
receptions. Some surveys currently estimate that an additional one third
of the white Evangelical world can be persuaded to vote Democratic.
Add that number to the one fifth of Evangelicals who already vote that
way and you can see why there is real anxiety as Republicans look at
2008.

So next time a commentator
or Religious Right leader fulminates against Democratic politicians
on religion, pull the curtain back and see what is really going on.
The Democratic message to Evangelicals and other religious communities
is gaining traction and Governor Dean has a strong hand in that work.
The palpable fear this creates is only going to grow in coming months.
Brace yourself for more noise.

Shaun Casey is a visiting fellow
at the Center for American Progress and he teaches Christian Ethics
at Wesley Theological Seminary in Washington, DC. His e-mail
address is [email protected].

Featured Writers

Previous Post

April 19, 2007

Is Abortion a "Woman's Health Issue?"

Next Post

April 20, 2007 The Wisdom of the Amish

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: David committed adultery with Bathsheba and arranged for her husband Uriah to be killed.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE