Edwards Was Right, Sort Of

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:10 am by Faithful Democrats

Edwards Was Right, Sort Of 2013-05-09T06:10:15-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Jesse Lava

So John Edwards has refused to fire two bloggers who, prior to writing for his website, made crude and offensive comments about Catholics and Catholic beliefs. He’s right — sort of.

The bloggers in question are Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwen. Right-wing blowhard Bill Donohue ripped into them after finding quotes such as the following in their history:

“The Catholic church is not about to let something like compassion for girls get in the way of using the state as an instrument to force women to bear more tithing Catholics.”

“The Pope’s gotta tell women who give birth to stillborns that their babies are cast into Satan’s maw.”

“What if Mary had taken Plan B after the Lord filled her with his hot, white, sticky Holy Spirit?… “You’d have to justify your misogyny with another ancient mythology.”

[Bush’s supporters are his] “wingnut Christofacsist base.”

These comments are pure trash. They’re not political arguments; they’re condemnations of people who hold certain religious beliefs. They’re not funny; they’re sardonic; they’re mean; they’re contemptuous. And calling out Marcotte and McEwen is entirely appropriate.

The problem is that the guy doing the calling out — Bill Donohue — is not an objective political observer who merely wants to stop anti-Catholic bigotry. He is a mean, spiteful man with a political axe to grind.

His most famous spewing of bile appeared on MSNBC’s Scarborough Country:

“Hollywood is controlled by secular Jews who hate Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular. It’s not a secret, OK? And I’m not afraid to say it. … Hollywood likes anal sex. They like to see the public square without nativity scenes. I like families. I like children. They like abortions.”

As Media Matters details thoroughly, there’s more:

“I’m saying if a Catholic votes for Kerry because they support him on abortion rights, that is to cooperate in evil.”

“Name for me a book publishing company in this country, particularly in New York, which would allow you to publish a book which would tell the truth about the gay death style.”

“[Addressing former Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL)]: “Most 15-year-old teenage boys wouldn’t allow themselves to be molested. So why did you?”

And so on. Donohue also seems to take a sick pleasure in ruining people who happen to be political opponents. In 2004, he thoroughly distorted the views and background of Mara Vanderslice, who was John Kerry’s religious outreach director at the time — and routinely brags about it despite having been discredited.

Meanwhile, Donohue usually fails to call out conservatives for anti-Catholic bigotry — again well documented by Media Matters — and thus should have little-to-no credibility as a purveyor of anything besides a right-wing political agenda.

Edwards was right to resist pressure from this particular source. Kowtowing to the likes of Bill Donohue is a never-ending exercise in futility. He’s the Energizer bunny of bile, and nothing will defang him except for standing up to him.

That said, we progressives would be foolish to simply accept disturbing comments such as those that Marcotte and McEwan seem to make a regular part of their blogging routine. If their slimy remarks had been directed at African-Americans, gays, Muslims, or other minority groups, progressives would be (rightly) up in arms. For both moral and strategic reasons, the progressive coalition should welcome — enthusiastically — a diversity of religious views.

Thus, Edwards didn’t go far enough when he said that the two bloggers “have both assured me that it was never their intention to malign anyone’s faith, and I take them at their word.” Anyone who can read and casts their judgments accordingly should understand that maligning people’s faith was precisely what Marcotte and McEwan aimed to do. Just tell it like it is: the bloggers said offensive things, there was nothing accidental about it, they both should grow up, and Bill Donohue still isn’t worth listening to.

Now there are legitimate questions out there about how we in the blog world should best spend our precious (if metaphorical) ink. Should we be attacking the likes of Bill Donohue, or assailing a couple of bloggers who had no prominence before this flap began? I’m inclined to say that the former is more important, all things considered, given the volume of Donohue’s bullhorn. We live in a target-rich environment, and message discipline has its place. But the twin goals of cultivating religious respect and building a wide progressive coalition are important endeavors. They matter. And we ignore them at our peril.

From the Pulpit

Previous Post

February 9, 2007

More Edwards

Next Post

February 10, 2007 Right On, Jesse

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which language is the official language of the Roman Catholic Mass worldwide since Vatican II?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Latin French Local vernacular Greek