Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Faithful Democrats

Catholic Trouble for John Edwards ???

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:10 am   by Faithful Democrats

Catholic Trouble for John Edwards ??? 2013-05-09T06:10:15-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As Eduardo Penalver at Commonweal argues, Bill Donohue — a one-man outrage show — is probably not the best guy to be out policing blogs for civility.

Eduardo Penalver over at Commonweal has a nice commentary on the Edwards campaign's recent blogosphere-related troubles:

 

"According to the NY Times:

 

Two bloggers hired recently by Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards
were criticized Tuesday by a Catholic group for posts they had written
elsewhere on the Internet. Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic
League for Religious and Civil Rights, demanded that Edwards fire
Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan. ''John Edwards is a decent man who
has had his campaign tarnished by two anti-Catholic, vulgar,
trash-talking bigots,'' Donohue wrote in a statement. ''He has no
choice but to fire them immediately.' The Edwards campaign declined to
comment. McEwan and Marcotte did not respond to e-mails requesting a
response. Donohue cited posts that the women made on blogs in the past
several months in which they criticized the pope and the church for its
opposition to homosexuality, abortion and contraception, sometimes using profanity.

 

"Sometimes using profanity? Get around the blogosphere much? Lots of
interesting things here. First, the headline of the article in the
Times is 'Catholics Slam Bloggers Hired By Edwards.' This is true as
far as it goes. Donohue is a Catholic, although I'm not sure the use of
the plural to describe his one-man outrage show is technically correct.
Second, it's interesting that Donohue thinks Edwards is a stand-up guy.
Let's see if that attitude survives should Edwards win the primary.
Third, Donohue is probably not the best guy to be out policing blogs
for civility. After all, this is the person who said the following:

 

'Who really cares what Hollywood thinks? All these hacks come out there. Hollywood is controlled by secular Jews who hate Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular. It's not a secret, OK? And I'm not afraid to say it. … Hollywood likes anal sex. They like to see the public square without nativity scenes. I like families. I like children. They like abortions. I believe in traditional values and restraint. They believe in libertinism.'

 

"Not only is he an embarrassment who obviously doesn't hold himself to
the same standards he holds for others, but his judgment of what counts
as anti-Catholic is, to say the least, seriously suspect, and has a
tendency towards, shall we say, ideological selectivity.

 

"Finally, as
much as it pains me to say it, I think Donohue may have a point in this
case. The blog posts mentioned in the story did speak of a deep-seated
hostility to the Church as an institution. For example, one post
described in the article said the following:

 

'The Catholic church is not about to let something like compassion for
girls get in the way of using the state as an instrument to force women
to bear more tithing Catholics,'' Marcotte wrote on the blog Pandagon
on Dec. 26.

"Besides being inaccurate (how many Catholics actually tithe?), I think
Marcotte's post goes beyond simply criticizing the Church's positions
on contraception, etc. on the merits and attacks the institution as a
whole in ways that resonate with traditionally anti-Catholic rhetoric
from the old days.  There are plenty of substantive grounds on which to
criticize the Church's position on contraception without resorting to
rhetoric that consiously aims to offend."

Featured Writers

Previous Post



February 3, 2007

What the Heck is McChurch?

Next Post



February 8, 2007 Congress tackling homelessness?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Abraham" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Father of Many Man of Wisdom King of Peace Chosen One

Related posts from Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

King, Isaiah, and the Politics of Now

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Stone Soup for the Soul: An Intern’s Lesson...

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Secret Confessions from the GOP Nominee: A Response

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Two American Dreams and One Economic Reality

Faithful Democrats

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Gas Prices: What Would Jesus Pay?

Many of my conservative Christian friends have been having a field day...

Jesus Was a Social Deviant: A Brief History...

  Americans like to say that this country was founded on the...

On Max Lucado Preaching At Washington National Cathedral

There has been a bit of controversy over the past week about...

Digital Deception: How We Ended Up Here And...

The American experiment has reached its moment of reckoning, and we seem...

“The evangelical vote is more diverse than you...

Rev. Jim Ball, EFB Co-Chair, is one of the voices featured in...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube