A Voter’s Guide for Disgruntled Evangelicals

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:22 am by Faithful Democrats

A Voter’s Guide for Disgruntled Evangelicals 2013-05-09T06:22:50-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Despite the Republican Party’s best efforts to

divert our attention to same-sex unions, the real moral issues of our day are
the war in Iraq
and the Bush administration’s use of torture against those it has designated
“enemy combatants.”

Since the rise of the Religious Right in the late 1970s,
politically conservative evangelicals have emerged as the Republican Party’s
most reliable constituency, similar to the role the labor movement once played
in the Democratic Party. George W. Bush’s reelection in 2004, for instance, was
widely attributed to “values voters.” But these same voters, according to
recent polls, are beginning to sour on the Republicans, even though they remain
wary of Democratic candidates. I offer here a voters’ guide for wavering
evangelicals.

The real moral
issues. Despite the Republican Party’s best efforts to divert our attention to
same-sex unions, the real moral issues of our day are the war in Iraq and the
Bush administration’s use of torture against those it has designated “enemy
combatants.” Centuries of just-war debates in the Christian tradition have
produced various criteria by which we judge the morality of armed conflict: Is
it a defensive war, and is the use of force undertaken as a last resort? Is the
amount of force roughly proportional to the supposed provocation? Have
provisions been made, as much as possible, to protect civilians from
“collateral damage”? The war in Iraq,
which was undertaken under false pretenses and which claims more than one
hundred civilian lives a day, satisfies none of these criteria.

The recent
legislation that effectively authorizes the use of torture is a moral travesty.
So too is the persistent refusal on the part of leaders of the Religious Right
to issue unequivocal denunciations of the practice. These are people who claim
to be “pro-life,” who purport to hear a “fetal scream.” Yet they turn a deaf
ear to the very real screams of fully formed individuals who are being tortured
in our name.

What about those
poor, defenseless babies? By my calculation, the Republican-Religious Right
coalition has controlled all three branches of the federal government since the
swearing in of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court on February 1, 2006. The
president, the majority leader of the Senate and the speaker of the House of
Representatives all claim to be evangelical Christians and unalterably opposed
to abortion.

Despite clear
majorities in both houses of Congress, however, the Republicans have made no
attempt to outlaw abortion, their stated goal. Perhaps they fear a backlash
from a majority of Americans who prefer a libertarian approach to matters of
gestation. Or maybe (more cynically) they are reluctant to settle an issue that
has repeatedly mobilized the Republican Party’s base of politically
conservative evangelicals. In either case, the Republicans’ failure to deliver
on their promises to outlaw abortion belies their putative moral convictions.

The sleaze factor.
Mark Foley. Jack Abramoff. Ralph Reed. Tom DeLay. The race-baiting ads aired by
the Republican National Committee in Tennessee.
Randy “Duke” Cunningham, former member of Congress now serving an eight-year
sentence for extortion, earned a 100 percent rating from the Christian
Coalition. Enough said.

The emergence of
the Religious Right in the late 1970s mobilized millions of evangelicals, many
of whom participated in the political process for the first time. The leaders
of the Religious Right, however, have refused to honor the noble legacy of
nineteenth-century evangelical activism, which invariably took the part of
those on the margins of society. Instead, they delivered these evangelicals
captive to right-wing politics and into the maw of the Republican Party.

It’s time for
rank-and-file evangelicals to rethink that alliance.

Featured Writers

Previous Post

November 1, 2006

The Pope is Not the Anti-Christ

Next Post

November 2, 2006 Democrats Do Christian Radio

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Psalm contains "The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 1 Psalm 51 Psalm 23 Psalm 119