Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Faithful Democrats

Why I’m Still Bullish on Porn

Last updated on: August 16, 2012 at 3:12 pm   by Eric Sapp

Why I’m Still Bullish on Porn 2012-08-16T15:12:31-06:00 Eric Sapp

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Conservatives aren't the only ones with successful wedge issues.

I'll admit that I'm not very blog savvy.  Two weeks ago was the first time I realized that this site keeps track of how many hits each of our different posts get.  Naturally, I checked the tallies to figure out what had most piqued the interest of our good viewers.  I'll admit that I was a little surprised that my earlier post on "Why I'm Bullish on Porn" got more hits than my last 6 posts combined!  I figure that the reason is either that people who visit this site are very interested in the strategic value of that topic (and they should be!).  Or perhaps that title has been acting as an evangelist of sorts for faithfuldemocrats.com and getting a lot of people to visit this site who were Googling something else…   Either way, I figure I'm doing something right.  So I'll go to the well one more time and do another post on the "wedge" (view my previous post for my redefining of that term) value of porn and decency/family values. 

 

Internet porn is such a good issue for us because it highlights the Republican tendency to prioritize power and money over values.  The Foley cover-up has made the Republican base even more sensitive to this problem.  Although there is not a direct parallel between internet porn and the Foley scandal, the Foley situation has made the conservative religious community much more open to the "wedge" effects of internet porn.

 

Many Christian Republicans are secretly (and correctly) afraid that the Republican Party's heart truly lies with the business community and earthy things rather than with God and heavenly things.  I have heard Democratic candidates in public and more private settings use the porn example when speaking to religious conservatives, and as with abortion reduction, conservatives are sitting up and beginning to listen.  Conservatives, especially religious ones, are getting fed up with Republicans talking tough on values issues and then doing virtually nothing at all.  Even Dobson is now relegated to using the rather wimpy line of "Republicans haven't been delivering, but the Democrats will be worse" when trying to mobilize his base to turn out in battle ground states.

 

So to help further that trend, I'm going to add one more Democratic "wedge" to block the Republican family values wedge (that sentence makes sense if you've read the posts I linked to above).  Violence and sex in the media (especially TV) is a real concern to parents and something Republicans tromp out every once in a while, but Republicans tend to avoid the issue for the most part because their allies are the main culprits.  I'm sure some folks our there are saying, "What?!!  Republicans have allied with liberal Hollywood actors?"  No, of course not.  But for the most part, the liberal Hollywood actors are not the ones who choose content for what is on TV…or in the movies for that matter.

 

"Ok, so who is choosing the content and what can we do about it," you might be thinking.  Well, I'm glad you asked because one of the best ways for Dems to get at the problem of violence/sex in the media without running into 1st Amendment issues is to draw the connection between indecency in the media and increased media consolidation (politics aside, reducing consolidation is also probably the best policy solution to the problem). 

 

Consolidation takes programming decisions out of the hands of local communities and places it in the hands of mega-corporations, which are less accountable and make decisions solely on what will shock and sell (perhaps the best example of this is FOX, which ironically many conservatives idolize because of its biased news network).  Consolidation also hurts religious broadcasters, which are being squeezed out because they tend to be locally-based and less profitable (if you have time and interest, check out this report for a lot more details on the connection between consolidation and indecency). 

 

What's nice about the whole consolidation argument from a political perspective is that it's not just about decency and protecting our children, although that can be the central theme.  Consolidation is also about standing up for the little guy and family business vs. the faceless multi-national corporation.  It is also about keeping control of our communities and plays in to people's fears that the Republicans are in the pocket of lobbyist and big business and are putting the interests of mega-corporations who only care about their bottom line above those of ordinary Americans. 

 

Finally, most people simply don't like the fact that radio stations all play the same music and bemoan the general quality of TV programming, decency aside.  So tying consolidation to decency and protecting our kids just gives them a moral reason to object to something they already don't particularly like anyway.  And so we can bring together a pretty large coalition around the idea of the need to fight continued media consolidation. 

 

I will conclude with the point I try to make on all policy recommendations.  We win when we align our interests with that of the American people, emphasize our policy positions that address core concerns of average Americans, and do what is right.  It's not pandering or political scheming if we are willing to take action to address these real concerns.  That's called good governing and truly being public servants.  So as I have said in the past, we need to emphasize our real solutions to internet porn and violence/sex in the media because doing so will improve our political fortunes and because it is the right thing to do.

Campaign Blog

Previous Post



October 23, 2006

MN-6: Republican Candidate's Church Says Catholics Follow the Antichrist

Next Post



October 23, 2006 Bono's Latest Mission


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was called by God to leave his home and go to a land God would show him?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Moses Abram Jacob Noah

Related posts from Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Disillusionment, Democracy, and the Fate of President Obama

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Notable Articles

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

White Evangelicals and the GOP

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Democrats Do Christian Radio

Faithful Democrats

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Gas Prices: What Would Jesus Pay?

Many of my conservative Christian friends have been having a field day...

Jesus Was a Social Deviant: A Brief History...

  Americans like to say that this country was founded on the...

On Max Lucado Preaching At Washington National Cathedral

There has been a bit of controversy over the past week about...

Digital Deception: How We Ended Up Here And...

The American experiment has reached its moment of reckoning, and we seem...

“The evangelical vote is more diverse than you...

Rev. Jim Ball, EFB Co-Chair, is one of the voices featured in...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube