Why Democrats Should Think Multinational Corporations Will Save The World

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:22 am by Faithful Democrats

Why Democrats Should Think Multinational Corporations Will Save The World 2013-05-09T06:22:53-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Two short essays have recently been published that express

values and policy positions that I think many faithful Democrats would
share. What bothers me about both pieces is that neither has anything positive to say about the role of multinational corporations in reducing global poverty or in advancing the political goals of Democrats.

The first is "The moral scandal of global poverty," written
by Archbishop George H. Niederauer of San Francisco (San Francisco Chronicle,
October 26) and the second is "We answer to the name of liberals," by Bruce
Ackerman and Todd Gitlin (The American Prospect, online).

What bothers me about both pieces is the complete absence of
any positive discussion of the role of multinational corporations (MNCs). Yes, I know, liberal ideology insists that we
demonize MNCs, and some of them are worth demonizing. However, the overwhelming majority of them
are not. As an illustration of this
point, consider that in 2003, William Greider, a long time liberal, quotes Paul
Hawken who says "There are 70,000 to 80,000 companies in the U.S. now whose
purpose is…sustainability" (source: The
Soul of Capitalism: Opening Paths to a Moral Economy, p. 200). Have you ever noticed that we almost never
hear about these companies in anti-corporation discussions? More importantly, it can rather easily be
argued that MNCs will continue to have more power to shape our future than any
other entity, governments included. If
progressively minded people want to help to channel this power in the right
direction, we should speak as constructively about MNCs as we can.

Three books have been published in the last few years that
indicate exactly how MNCs are likely to shape our global future for the
better. The best is Stuart Hart's Capitalism at the Crossroads: The Unlimited
Business Opportunities in Solving the World's Most Difficult Problems
(Wharton School Publishing, 2005). Two
other good books are The Fortune at the
Bottom of the Pyramid by C.K. Prahalad (Wharton School Publishing, 2005)
and Transforming the Development
Landscape: The Role of the Private Sector (Brookings Institution Press,
2006), edited by Lael Brainard.

All of these books make two essential points. First, changes in the global economy brought
about by weakness in developed economies and instability in developing markets are
going to force companies to look to the 4 billion or more people who live on
two dollars a day or less (the "bottom" or "base" of the economic
pyramid). Second, when MNCs start to
treat the base of the pyramid as a market to be served, rather than as a source
of cheap labor, then some very good things will start to happen. First, there will be a massive reduction in
global poverty as MNCs create market-oriented ecosystems that produce
long-terms jobs and wealth (as opposed to short term philanthropy). Second, given the unique requirements of
serving the base of the pyramid, technological innovations will emerge that emphasize
clean and sustainable products and production.
This technology can then leapfrog to the top of the economic pyramid. The books give lots of examples of how MNCs
are already doing both of these things.

I know, I know. Some
of you will find in this post further evidence that I am a Republican
mole. I am not. I only want my fellow faithful Democrats to
keep an open mind as they work to make the world a better place for everyone.

Reader Blogs

Previous Post

October 27, 2006

Keeping Faith with the Minimum Wage

Next Post

October 27, 2006 Michael J. Fox spotlights a need

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Hebrews define as "confidence in what we hope for"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Righteousness Faith Salvation Love