Foley: the catalyst, not the cause

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:23 am by Faithful Democrats

Foley: the catalyst, not the cause 2013-05-09T06:23:06-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The new Gallup poll showing that Democrats are now dead-even among white, frequent church-goers is a bit astonishing given the decades-long advantage that Republicans have had on that group. What’s even more astonishing is that most of the movement seems to have taken place over the last month.

One could advance a simple explanation for the change: the Foley fallout. Foley’s a creep, Hastert covered it up, case closed.

But Josh Marshall is onto something when he says that explanation is a little too simple to be true. Americans had been giving Republicans abysmal marks for months before this scandal. An incompetent war, a corrupt Congress, an arrogant White House, a stagnant economy for average Americans — all this and more had long suggested that a Democratic takeover of the House and maybe even the Senate could be in the cards. Until two weeks ago, one of the only groups that hadn’t completely bailed on the Republicans was white, frequent church-goers.

Why? Denial is a powerful thing. And this segment of the electorate — a good chunk of it, anyway — has long been quick to give Republicans the benefit of the doubt, no matter the evidence. These were the Republicans’ people, and the Republicans were their party. Turning against one’s own isn’t an easy thing to do.

And in a way, I don’t blame these folks. Think about how African-Americans have stuck with the Democrats through thick and thin over the years, no matter how often our party seems to take them for granted. It would take quite a lot of Democratic malfeasance to get blacks to bolt our party — and now, it would take just as much Republican malfeasance to do the same for many of America’s most religious white voters.

Post-Foley, though, there’s no more denying it. The Foley scandal is the catalyst that has finally laid bare the hypocrisy of Republican values-speak. A party that has succeeded largely by claiming a monopoly on morality cannot undertake such a long series of moral hijinks — from DeLay to Abramoff to Libby to Hastert — and expect to continue its reign. Foley will not be the cause of the Republicans’ likely demise in November. But he will have made it a lot easier for folks like us to make our case.

In the meantime, we can only hope that this change in the electorate signals a readiness on the part of millions of religious voters to think anew about what being a values voter really means. Does it mean a devotion to two or three hot-button issues? Or does it mean a commitment to justice, to the common good, to empathetic love?

Reasonable people can disagree. But I and millions of others are going with the latter, and I suspect that more and more Americans will, too.

Featured Writers

Previous Post

October 13, 2006

Bush blames Clinton for Christian approach on North Korea

Next Post

October 13, 2006 So, how's the housing market if you're poor?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the last king of Judah before the Babylonian exile?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Josiah Zedekiah Hezekiah Jehoiakim