Defending Marriage…. but against what or whom?

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:22 am by Faithful Democrats

Defending Marriage…. but against what or whom? 2013-05-09T06:22:54-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Gay Marriage definitely would not have been my first choice as the topic of my first-time blog on FaithfulDemocrats, especially as we come down to the wire on close and contentious mid-term elections in which issues of Faith are so prominently being raised. However, today's decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court in the case of several of that state's citizens suing for equal protection under the law and equal rights and benefits turn my attention once again to issues of marriage and justice which test my conscience as a Christian, a Catholic, and a priest.

I received a telephone call yesterday from a former parishioner. It's always good to hear from those I've served, and both gratifying and humbling to hear kind and generous comments about how I've been given grace to be an instrument of the Lord's work in the lives of his people. It is a little embarassing to report, as I must if I'm completely honest, that given the dismal statistics in this country, and most of the industrialized West, that I was actually relieved to hear that the marriage at which I officiated for this parishioner and his bride some ten years ago was still intact, and in fact, thriving. In recounting this, I hear a small but clear voice saying to me, "Oh, ye of little faith."

But the truth is that there is more than a kernel of truth in the otherwise disingenous and outright deceptive title that politicians too often choose to apply when pandering to the Christian Right and engaging in an assault on civil liberties for political gain — "Defense of Marriage" initiatives.

Of course there is an intrinsic sanctity to Marriage, instituted as it was by God, gloriously affirmed by our Lord's first miracle, and beautifully modeled by Mary and Joseph. That sanctity has been reverenced by virtually every religious tradition, rising throughout the Christian Churches to the level of Sacrament or Ordinance.

And yes, that sanctity is threatened by our increasingly secularist culture, ever more hostile to any notion of the sacred. Divorce rates soar, as do the number of children being raised with little or no relationship with one parent. The consistent message of our society seems to be one which values sensuality more highly than commitment.

It is no wonder that many, including otherwise prayerful and thoughtful Christians succumb to the temptation to find a scapegoat, accept any initiative which promises a "quick fix," or both. Which brings us to the decision today in New Jersey.

The court has applied methodical reasoning and a simple reading of constitutional guarantees of liberty and justice, and mandated a simple remedy to what should be a self-evident case of discrimination in civil law. I have no doubt that we are in for feverish charges of "judicial activism" and that the specter of a "gay agenda" threatening the institution of marriage will once again be raised high.

Let's please not fall for it this time. The sanctity of marriage is threatened by the attitudes of those who enter into it too readily, and abandon it with equal ease. It is under assault by economic conditions which require both parents too work too hard and long simply to survive. It is being shaken at its core by a "disposable commodity" mentality which pervades our culture. And yet, it still stands. Surely, affording our citizens equal opportunity under the law cannot bring it down. Nor is it in any way desirable to have the Sacraments and Ordinances of Christ and His Church placed under the jurisdiction of legislatures and courts to define.

What is at issue here, whether called Same-Sex Marriage or Civil Unions is a civil contract between two citizens. It is still up to individual Christians and our Churches to determine to what extent, if at all, these should be regarded as sacramental. That is the situation now, and it will be the situation no matter what the courts and legislatures decide. They simply have no jurisdiction over the Ordinances and Sacraments of Christ through His Church.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey has spoken clearly and administered justice for its citizens. Christians and the Church remain free to teach and preach the Gospel, and to administer the Sacraments. I find nothing here to fear.

Reader Blogs

Previous Post

October 25, 2006

The Good News in New Jersey

Next Post

October 25, 2006 Those Liberal Evangelicals

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who built an ark to survive a great flood?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Moses Abraham David Noah