Arizona Justice of the Peace Candidate Suceeds on Free Speech Claim

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:22 am by Faithful Democrats

Arizona Justice of the Peace Candidate Suceeds on Free Speech Claim 2013-05-09T06:22:56-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

ARIZONA SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVERSES PRIOR OPINIONS AND ITS OWN CANNONS OF ETHICS – LETS MINISTER/ATTORNEY ENCOURAGE PUBLIC TO VOTE THEIR VALUES IN THE UPCOMING ELECTION.

For years Arizona has prohibited any
judicial candidate the right to speak out about legal or political
issues. Kingman, Arizona Justice of the Peace candidate Randolph D.
Wolfson, an attorney practicing for 24 years and an ordained minister,
wrote the Arizona Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee demanding an
official Advisory Opinion seeking to have the State comply with 1st Amendment Free Speech provisions of the U.S. Constitution.

When he was told no such opinion would be issued before the November 7th
General Election, Wolfson, on October 3, 2006, filed suit in the
Federal District Court of Arizona under the Civil Rights Act, §1983,
seeking an injunction against, among other things, any action against
any judicial candidate or judge for speaking publicly in support of the
Ballot Proposition 107 – the Arizona Marriage Protection Amendment or
any other disputed legal or political issue.

This morning, the Arizona Supreme Court suspended its rules prohibiting
an Advisory Opinion while litigation is pending. That opened the way
for Arizona Supreme Court Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee to issue
an opinion – which it promptly did – reversing previous opinions and
limiting its own Cannons of Ethical Conduct. The Committee today
Ordered "A judicial candidate may publicly discuss his or her personal
opinion of an initiative measure or other political subject…because a
candidate may express views on any disputed issue." The Committee cited
the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in the case Republican Party vs. White
for its need to make a turn about in Arizona law because the United
States Supreme Court directed "that the First Amendment permits
judicial candidates to inform the electorate by expressing the
candidates’ views on disputed political or legal issues."

A hearing for a Preliminary Injunction is scheduled before the Arizona
Federal District Court on October 31, 2006 on the remainder of Mr.
Wolfson’s Civil Rights claims involving Arizona’s prohibitions against
judicial candidates soliciting or directly receiving campaign
contributions, prohibitions against endorsing or publicly supporting
other candidates; speaking for a political organization or party and
other constitutional protected free speech issues.

Today Judge Niel V. Wake, Federal District Court Judge recused himself
from the case without comment. The case has been reassigned to Judge
Stephen M. MacNamee. MacNamee was appointed by Pres. George H. Bush in
1990.

Justice of the Peace candidate Wolfson said "This election is very
important to me and I have exerted my full effort to run for this
office. However, at every turn I have been hamstrung by the burden of
the overbearing and unfair restraints placed on my right to speak to
the issues of the day. Today, I am proud to tell the voters of Arizona
that her judges have finally been set free."

"Aside from being able to lead hundreds of the lost to a saving
knowledge in Jesus Christ, I think this is the most important thing I
have accomplished in my 24 year law practice", Wolfson said.

When asked what importance the decision will have for Arizona, Wolfson
said, "Today, with the agreement of the Supreme Court’s Judicial Ethics
Committee, the culture of Arizona has been forever changed. Starting
today, voters can demand accountability from their judges. From now on,
judges shall be elected or removed from office based on the candidate’s
stated values and beliefs and not just upon who knows the candidate or
what party they may support."

Wolfson said " I am proud of the Ethic’s Committee’s determination to
support the a policy of free political and religious speech. This is a
great day for freedom, a great day for Arizona."

Reader Blogs

Previous Post

October 23, 2006

Love and Judgment of Homosexuals

Next Post

October 24, 2006 Red and Blue God, Black and Blue Church

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is known for his wisdom and built a temple?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Moses Solomon Paul David