Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Faithful Democrats

A Pastoral Letter on the Death Penalty by Rev. Paul Stumme-Diers

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:22 am   by Faithful Democrats

A Pastoral Letter on the Death Penalty by Rev. Paul Stumme-Diers 2013-05-09T06:22:55-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Pastoral Letter on the Death Penalty from Rev. Paul Stumme-Diers, Bishop of the Greater Milwaukee Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America that answers the question: “Should the death penalty be enacted in the State of Wisconsin for cases involving a person who is convicted of first-degree intentional homicide, if the conviction is supported by DNA evidence?”

This pastoral letter begins to articulate a faith-based case against the death penalty referendum before the citizens of the state of Wisconsin.  It is my hope that this conversation will continue vigorously in the congregations of our synod as the November 7th election approaches.

The voice of the interfaith community provides a strong, unambiguous, and particular witness addressing the referendum before the electors of the state of Wisconsin in opposition to the death penalty.  This is a witness shared consistently by mainline Christian denominations, as well as our Jewish and Muslim brothers and sisters, and its voice complements that of the secular concerns raised against the reinstatement of capital punishment. 

This is a dialogue that has been ongoing and consistent in the life of our church.  In 1991, the ELCA adopted a social statement in strong opposition to the death penalty. The statement called upon our church, in all its expressions, to stand in opposition to its establishment and implementation.  This stance was reiterated at the 2006 Greater Milwaukee Synod Assembly, as the highest legislative body of our synod voted to “oppose the death penalty and its reintroduction into Wisconsin.” 

The faith-based case opposing the death penalty complements and indeed strengthens that of non-faith-dependent arguments; it echoes the pragmatic positions against capital punishment, while giving a particular accent to the dialogue.  In this pastoral letter I rely upon those experts in their respective fields to make their informed cases against this referendum, and I attempt to speak from a perspective of faith, a faith centered in a God who calls us to choose life.

I look to the sociologists to explain the racist nature of death penalty implementation, with its historic disproportionate application to persons of color, particularly persons of African descent.

In faith, the cry for justice from Moses and the Exodus, to Martin Luther King, Jr., speaks for the oppressed.  In doing so the faith community has subscribed to the dictum of Micah 6:8: “What does the Lord require, but to do justice, love kindness, and walk humbly with our God.”  At face value, putting someone to death is anathema to the belief that all God’s children are of infinite worth, and God’s constant call for mercy.

I look to the economists to verify that states which embrace the death penalty expend far more resources carrying out this punishment than those that do not.

In faith, it is a matter of stewardship to oppose the death penalty, a stewardship of life as well as a stewardship of resources.  To expend resources on a policy of death, while underfunding programs that enrich life and the safety of communities, is poor public policy, and poor stewardship.

I look to criminologists to point out that states that have the death penalty do not experience a lower crime rate than those who have rejected this approach,

In faith, Jesus says, “You have heard it said, ‘An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth’ but I say to you, ‘Do not resist an evildoer. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also.’” Jesus goes on in the same lesson, instructing us to, “Love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you.”  To oppose the death penalty is to follow a clear command from Christ.

I rely upon psychologists to substantiate the claim that when violence is institutionalized by the state (including the recent debate on justifying torture), it promotes a culture of violence that undermines civil society, and promotes a cycle of violence.

In faith, I recognize a sovereign God who is the sole proprietor of justice.  Vengeance is God’s, and to place ourselves in God’s place is perilous.  The compassion and prayers of the faith community extend to the victims of all violence.  It is our hope that in refraining from the death penalty, we will promote a social climate where violence is diminished in all its forms.

I look to the testimony of the hundreds of individuals who have been on “death row” who have then subsequently been exonerated, to remind us that mistakes in the justice system are made, and are irrevocable when resulting in death.

From the cross, the instrument of the death penalty imposed upon Jesus, we hear the voice of innocent suffering, “Father forgive them, for they know not what they do.”

I listen to the advocates for the poor and vulnerable who rightly point out that such populations are much more susceptible to having the death penalty applied in cases where they are on trial.

In faith, we are called upon to visit the prisoner as though we are visiting Jesus himself.  The death penalty effectively denies us that privilege, and heaps injustice upon those who are already marginalized and powerless.

I am aware that there are those in our church and community who favor the death penalty.  In our conversations, such voices must also be heard, even as arguments favoring capital punishment are acknowledged in the ELCA social statement.  The consistent testimony of our church, however, stands in strong opposition to the death penalty.  I encourage you, in this time of moral deliberation in our state, to make use of resources of our church, as well as the excellent materials recently made available by the Wisconsin Council of Churches, in your congregational and community conversations.

“And may the peace of God that passes all human understanding, keep our hearts and minds in Christ Jesus.”

Rev. Paul Stumme-Diers, Bishop of the Greater Milwaukee Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
October 2006

Sermon of the Week

Previous Post



October 24, 2006

The Republican Base is Crumbling

Next Post



October 24, 2006 Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) on the Harmony of Faith and Stem-Cell Research


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What prophet multiplied a widow's jar of oil so she could pay her debts?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Amos Micah Elijah Elisha

Related posts from Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Christ and Everything Else Thrown In

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

It's Really Quite Obvious, by Rev. Anna Clock...

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Not to Bring Peace, But a Sword, by...

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Confounded by Lies and Idols, By Rev. Susan...

Faithful Democrats

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Gas Prices: What Would Jesus Pay?

Many of my conservative Christian friends have been having a field day...

Jesus Was a Social Deviant: A Brief History...

  Americans like to say that this country was founded on the...

On Max Lucado Preaching At Washington National Cathedral

There has been a bit of controversy over the past week about...

Digital Deception: How We Ended Up Here And...

The American experiment has reached its moment of reckoning, and we seem...

“The evangelical vote is more diverse than you...

Rev. Jim Ball, EFB Co-Chair, is one of the voices featured in...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube