Commonweal Gets It Wrong

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:19 am by Faithful Democrats

Commonweal Gets It Wrong 2013-05-09T06:19:54-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Democrats' challenge is not a lack of religion, but verbalizing just how religion motivates our governing philosophy and proving — with deeds rather than words — that we mean what we say.

I blanched as I read the editorial on Catholic swing voters in the August edition of Commonweal. Like dozens of other articles, the editorial lays out chapter and verse of the challenge facing Democrats.

I have a different take on this than the Commonweal editors and others on the challenge facing Democrats. The editors hang much of their analysis on a speech given by William Galston in which he said, among other things, that some Democrats opposed welfare reform in 1996 because it was "values-laden." (If it was so laden with values, why did the Catholic Bishops and Catholic Charities raise serious concerns about it in 1996 and oppose a version of the extension of it in 2002?).

Commonweal and Galston and countless others argue that Democratic Party has a religion problem because part of the party, if not all the party, is hostile to religion, a position which serves as an echo chamber for the attacks from Republicans.

Democrats' challenge, however, is not a lack of religion, but verbalizing just how religion motivates our governing philosophy and proving — with deeds rather than words — that we mean what we say. As Senator Obama argued in his June speech, as long as Democrats are not defining themselves, others will do so, most often in the least attractive light.

Whatever your view of the challenge of religion facing Democrats, the month of September has been a very good one.

The good news started in the September edition of Commonweal, where it detailed the prospects of Bill Ritter, the Democratic nominee for Governor in Colorado. Ritter's life story is a moving one – worked his way through high school, college and law school to help support his family and fund his studies. Ritter also happens to be pro-life, not unlike the Democratic Leader of the U.S. Senate, incidentally. So much for Democrats being a party that would not permit a diversity of views among its elected leaders.

The good news continued on September 14, when a coalition of pro-life and pro-choice Democrats introduced a bill to reduce the number of abortions in the United States. The Reducing the Need for Abortion and Supporting Parents Act increases funding for adoption and access to contraception in an effort to move the debate on abortion away from stasis to realistic solutions. So much for Democrats espousing only abortion on demand, as Commonweal argued in August.

That same day Bob Casey, the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania, delivered the 38th Annual Pope John XXIII lecture. Citing the need to protect the dignity of each person, Casey challenged all policymakers to move beyond a discussion of faith in public life that deals with one issue — abortion — and addresses the range of injustice that undercuts the dignity of people. Quoting his father, Casey said:

"Only government, when all else fails, can safeguard the vulnerable and powerless. When it reneges on that obligation, freedom becomes a hollow word. A hard-working person unable to find work and support his or her family is not free. A person for whom sickness means financial ruin, with no health insurance to soften the blow, is not free. A malnourished child, an uneducated child, a child trapped in foster care — these children are not free. And without a few breaks along the way from government, such children in most cases will never be truly free."

September has been a turning point for Democrats, who have begun to show – in word and deed – how our faith motivates us to fight for the common good. While Republicans will continue to fight for the coarse individualism where each person is left to fight for his own, Democrats will fight for the common good and in so doing stand up for the dignity of each person. Whether that is enough to solve the Democrats' religion problem is anyone's guess. What is not open to question is whether it is the right thing to do.

Campaign Blog

Previous Post

September 25, 2006

Christians Bring Hope for the Planet

Next Post

September 26, 2006 To Kill and Torture for Freedom

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who killed his own brother out of jealousy and became the first murderer in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jacob Esau Cain Ishmael