Abortion’s Middle Ground

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:20 am by Faithful Democrats

Abortion’s Middle Ground 2013-05-09T06:20:00-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Not long ago, I stumbled into a heated debate with a friend

over the issue of abortion. My friend, a
progressive Christian, took offense when I mentioned a basic human-rights fact…

Not long ago, I stumbled into a heated debate with a friend
over the issue of abortion. My friend, a
progressive Christian, took offense when I mentioned a basic human-rights fact: The United Nations International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, Part III, Article 6.1 reads: "Every human being has the inherent right to
life. This right shall be protected by
law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived
of his life."

I shared this with my friend and she shrugged it off, "Well,
so what?"

"So what," I said?
"So, international law values and protects the lives of every living
human being."

"So, what," my friend chided? "Women still have the right to choose what
happens to their bodies."

"Well, yes, I agree" I said, "But if the baby is alive,
we're not just talking about the woman's body," I challenged. "… All I'm saying is, according to
international law, the woman's right to choose stops when it is determined that
the fetus is in fact a viable human being."

With indignation, my friend said "It doesn't matter if the
fetus is alive or not, the woman still has the right to choose what happens to
her body."

The conversation got heated, conflated, and like most
abortion debates – led nowhere.

Here are a few key facts:

The U.S.
has signed and ratified the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The
U.S. courts abided by the covenant even as they rightly determined that
our nation's standards for when a human life becomes "viable" would not be
guided by religious belief, rather by objective medical and historical
evidence.
The
court understood that to create law founded on the conviction of religious
belief, it would ultimately have to sacrifice the constitution's guarantee of freedom from religious
establishment.
Scientists
believe viability occurs in the 24-30 week stage of pregnancy. (Read this Psychology
Today interview for more info.)
Therefore,
before the stage of viability, the fetus is legally considered a part of
the mother.

The Roe vs.
Wade ruling is fascinating. If you
haven't read it, I highly recommend it.

I still disagree with my friend who believes a woman has the right to choose even in the case of a viable fetus. Personally, my faith leads me to believe life begins even before conception when God creates the soul. So, I feel the hole in my
own generation (Gen X), which would have been the largest generation in U.S. history if
it were not for the prevalence of abortion in the 70's.

Yet, as an American, I remain beholden to (and grateful for)
our Constitution's disestablishment of religion. Disestablishment, the very thing that allows
religious faith to thrive in our land, means that I cannot force anyone to adhere to the standards of my religious faith.

So, in the end, I find myself standing on middle ground. I believe the
Roe vs. Wade ruling was the only viable decision in our religiously pluralistic nation. I am, thus, compelled to work within the bounds of the law to
strengthen families by working to eradicate the felt need – or even the impulse – to
consider abortion as an option.

I like what Sen. Hillary
Rodham Clinton said of abortion: "I
believe we can all recognize that abortion in many ways represents a sad, even
tragic choice to many, many women."

She went on to proclaim, "There is
no reason why government cannot do more to educate and inform and provide
assistance so that the choice guaranteed under our constitution either does not
ever have to be exercised or only in very rare circumstances."

Amen.

Featured Writers

Previous Post

September 19, 2006

The Faith of a Mustard Seed

Next Post

September 20, 2006 Supporting Women's Health WIll Reduce Abortion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was turned into a pillar of salt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Naomi Lot's wife Ruth Lot