Ruminations from a Roman Ruin

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:20 am by Faithful Democrats

Ruminations from a Roman Ruin 2013-05-09T06:20:48-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A common past is hard to come by in a country whose people arrived scattershot by way of

the Mayflower, the Middle Passage, and the Mexican border. Despite our
differences, America stands for ideals of equality, even if Jeffersonâs
old saw that, âAll men are created equalâ did not include all
people. Through the ideal of equality, Americans share a common past,
despite lacking a common history.

I visited Rome recently, with friends. Over the course of an hour
our
conversation moved from religion to politics â not inappropriate in a
city dominated by the ghost of empire both Papal and Roman. While
standing in the ruins of the forum a question arose: What are the
internal causes of an empireâs decline?

To be sure,
there are many causes â too many for this column. For the Papacy it was
the perceived corruption that led to the reformation. For Rome,
decadence and internal power struggles weakened the empire from the
inside, while outside threats dismantled it. In both cases there was a
disconnect between the people and the powerful that weakened the
empireâs communities. Eventually those communities separated themselves
from the empire.

Communities are
more than a group of individuals working for an economic outcome.
Communities are complex interrelations that shape individuals who, in
turn, shape the community. When a significant group of people feel that
their interests are not valued by the community at large, communities
begin to break down. Take the Revolutionary War as an example. The colonies believed that England did not take its interest in political representation seriously, and decided to secede from the kingdom. It did so, despite many commonalities with England â enough commonality to divide families and require brothers to face
each other on the field of battle.

So how should we
define community?

I submit that a key part of community is shared value
for a common past, shared understanding about current needs, and a
shared value for a future outcome. A common past is
hard to come by in a country whose people arrived scattershot by way of
the Mayflower, the Middle Passage, and the Mexican border. Despite our
differences, America stands for ideals of equality, even if Jeffersonâs
old saw that, âAll men are created equalâ did not include all
people. Through the ideal of equality, Americans share a common past,
despite lacking a common history.

Understanding
about current needs is not academic. It comes from empathy â from
realizing that we all have difficulties, pain, and sorrow in our lives.
In so doing, we can begin to appreciate the significance of other
peopleâs problems. If nothing else, having an empathetic understanding
for the problems of others keeps us from dismissing them out of
hand. Empathy humanizes the plight of others.

Shared value for
a future outcome is tied to a valued past and a capacity for
empathy. In valuing the ideal of equality, we put it to work in our
lives. Having empathy for the needs of others allows us to question
both the outcomes of our own actions and how we may be of immediate
help in a situation of suffering. In this way, equality and empathy
give rise to hope for a better future for our communities because these
principles move us to action.

The Bush
administration does not believe this. At best, Bush believes in
compassionate conservatism â hollow lip service not backed by action,
and America is suffering because of it. We are divided. Red states/blue
states. Tax cuts and cut backs. Big words for Katrina victims, but
little action in rebuilding the New Orleans levies, even a year later.

Worse yet, recent
polls show that peopleâs belief in governmentâs ability to respond
effectively to this type of inequality and corruption is at an all-time
low. The administration is ineffective at addressing the problems of
working people because its heart is not in it. The Bushes canât act
domestically because domestic action goes against their political and
economic philosophyâwhy should government help people when
self-interest can?

Bushâs failures don’t mean that government canât help; they just mean that the wrong people are running the government.

The government is an extension of us and our
communities. There should not be a disconnect between the needs of the
people and the will of the powerful. Government should be in the
business of helping tie communities together and should be proactive in
helping communities address their problems.

As a Christian I believe
that no one should be abandoned to self-interest because we are to love
each other as ourselves. This love is the work of Christ. Love and its
effect on community animates the Christian message and is the story of
the early church.
We must engage
each other â building bridges to each other, understanding each otherâs
problems and helping to address them. Because the government is an
extension of ourselves and our communities, we should expect no less
from it.

Featured Writers

Previous Post

August 24, 2006

Shop

Next Post

August 25, 2006 Religious Values: The Higher Ground

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Isaac's wife?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Rachel Sarah Leah Rebekah