Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Was the Resurrection a Hoax?

Was the Resurrection a Hoax?

Last updated on: April 11, 2017 at 10:44 pm by Megan Schmidt

Was the Resurrection a Hoax? 2017-04-11T22:44:58+00:00 Megan Schmidt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

by Jedediah McClure

The Resurrection of Jesus Christ, believed by roughly 2.4 billion people across the world, is the foundation of the world’s largest religion. In the Biblical narrative, Jesus of Nazareth was crucified by Roman soldiers and buried in a sepulcher (tomb). Three days later Jesus miraculously rose from the dead to proclaim His divinity and declare the redemption of all mankind. The reality of this event is the cornerstone of all Christianity, without which Christianity would cease to exist.

But could the Resurrection have been a hoax? Is it possible that Jesus was not resurrected, but that his body was stolen in the night and hidden by his disciples to fake his Resurrection?

Unfortunately, there are no history books that can shed light on this subject – the only records of the Resurrection that exist are the four gospel accounts recorded in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Despite popular opinion, these gospels were not eyewitness accounts of the Resurrection. In fact, all four gospel accounts were written decades after Jesus’ death by people who had never known Jesus and who relied on the sayings of others. As the author of Luke confessed, he was not a witness to the Resurrection. Instead he “carefully investigated” the accounts that were “handed down” by Jesus’ earliest disciples in order to write his own account to convince his readers to believe in Jesus. (Luke 1:1-4).

In other words, the gospel accounts were not precise historical records so much as they were persuasive arguments in support of increasingly popular beliefs written by believers in order to codify the story and to address important problems facing the Christian community. The accounts set out to tell the story of Jesus: His life, mission, death, and Resurrection, and why it mattered to new followers. In other words, if we compare them to modern standards, the gospels are more akin to apologetic propaganda than a historical record.

With that in mind, by parsing through the distinctions between the gospel accounts, we get a rare glimpse into a little known, but very significant, perception of the first-century Christians.

All four gospels agree that on the third day several women went to Jesus’ tomb but found it empty. Interestingly, Jesus’ Resurrection was not their first assumption. Instead, they believed someone came during the night and took his body: “They have taken away my Lord, and I know not where they have laid him” (John 20:2, 13). In fact, John indicates that they were not even aware that Jesus was supposed to be resurrected: “For as yet they knew not the scripture, that he must rise again from the dead” (John 20:9).

Eventually, in the accounts, Jesus appears to the disciples, confirms his Resurrection, and they spread the word to the world. But, not everyone was convinced that Jesus was resurrected.

Matthew states, “This saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day…[that] His disciples came by night, and stole him [away] while we slept …” (Matthew 28:13, 15). Matthew’s account clearly acknowledges a belief among the people that Jesus’ body was stolen by Jesus’ own disciples. In fact, one of the fundamental purposes of Matthew’s gospel was to quash the rumors of body-snatching by altering the story in such a way as to make the theft of Jesus’ body impossible.

The Gospel of Matthew starts its Resurrection account with a unique and peculiar conversation between Pilate and the chief priests. The priests first remind Pilate of Jesus’ self-prophecy that He (a “deceiver”) would rise from the dead. They then warn Pilate that Jesus’ followers might steal his body and then tell the people that He was resurrected. Matthew employs a brilliant rhetorical device here by first informing the reader that Jesus prophesied his own Resurrection, and then theatrically pitting Jesus against the corrupt and widely hated priests.

The priests then suggest that Pilate place guards at Jesus’ tomb to prevent people from stealing the body. Pilate agrees to provide soldiers to guard the tomb from thieves, but then goes a step further by ordering them to secure the tomb by “sealing” the stone, thereby ensuring that the body could not be removed (Matthew 27:62-66).

These two details are not in the other gospel accounts. In fact, not only do Mark, Luke, and John exclude any mention of guards, but in those accounts when the women arrived at the tomb the stone was already rolled away. In fact, their first thought, echoing the concern of the priests, was not that Jesus arose from the dead, but rather that his body was stolen (John 20:2, 13).

According to Matthew, on the morning of the Resurrection, two women went to the tomb but found it sealed and guarded. An angel then appeared, rolled back the stone blocking the door, and caused the soldiers to faint. Matthew wants the reader to believe, despite contradicting the other accounts, that there was no possible way Jesus’ body could have been stolen precisely because the tomb was shut with a stone, sealed and guarded by soldiers. Again, these details are in stark contrast to Mark, Luke, and John where the stone had been removed before the women arrived and where the women believed someone had stolen Jesus’ body.

In contrast, the body-snatching accusation is addressed in Matthew, but rather than coming from the sympathetic female disciples it comes from the corrupt priests. In a story found exclusively in Matthew, the soldiers reported back to the priests and the priests then, in a Faustian demonstration of soul-damning corruption, paid the soldiers to lie! The priests instructed, “Tell the people that Jesus’ followers came during the night and stole the body while you were sleeping (Matthew 28:13).

Matthew continued, “So the soldiers took the money and did as they were instructed [lied to the people]. And this story has been widely circulated among the Jews to this very day.” (Matthew 28:15) Matthew’s account gives us valuable insight into the cultural interpretation of Jesus’ Resurrection during the end of the first century. Matthew acknowledged that there was a widely circulated belief that Jesus was not resurrected, but that his body was stolen by unscrupulous devotees (of a deceiver). Matthew further asserted that the rumors originated with the corrupt chief priests.

In other words, Matthew’s story specifically counters the widely circulated rumors of body-snatching by first making it impossible for Jesus’ body to have been stolen, and then alleging that the rumors were started by a group of corrupt priests who were already highly resented by the Jewish population at large.

It is revealing that Matthew would make such an effort to address this issue, indicating that it was a critical problem facing the early Christians. In fact, in the last twenty-five verses of Matthew’s text, twelve of those verses are dedicated to countering the accusation of body-snatching while only six featured the resurrected Jesus. Clearly, for Matthew, this widely circulated accusation was a significant problem that the author felt he needed to address.

In the end, we may never know what actually happened at Jesus’ tomb, but one thing appears certain, even the gospel accounts acknowledge that some people in the first century believed the Resurrection was a hoax.

Jedediah McClure is the author of the award-winning book The Myths of Christianity and has held a life-long passion for ancient history and religion. He has written many essays and articles on Christian culture and history emphasizing the role cultural influences play in the necessary adaptation of religion in various cultures. McClure is currently a business consultant and Juris Doctor candidate at NIU’s College of Law. To learn more about The Myths of Christianity or McClure’s speaking appearances please visit www.MythsofChristianity.com.

Previous Post

April 7, 2017

PLEASE STOP PRAYING FOR SYRIAN BOMBING VICTIMS

Next Post

April 14, 2017 TGIF? I Don't Think So...

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Author Interviews Battle Over the Body and Blood of Christ Bearing Beauty Book Reviews Christian Education christian spirituallity christianity Christmas Church Church Leadership Contemplation Creation Care Death and Dying Death Penalty Disruptive Change Disruptors Series Easter Education Evolution and Faith Future of Progressive Christianity Gun Violence Health & Wellness Holy Week Interfaith Israel-Palestine Leading Differently Lent LGBTQ Living with Cancer Meditations on the Cross Mental Illness millennials Mimetic Mondays Monday Meditations Movie Reviews New Monasticism Pando Populus Parenting Patheos 10+1 Q&A Series PC(USA) Politics Pop Culture Practical Theology Series Prayer progressive christian Race Relations Reformation religion Religion and Politics Religion in America Rethink Church Social Justice Spirituality Spirituality of the Body Stump a Scholar Technology and Faith Thanksgiving Theodicy Trust Me Church Uncategorized Why I'm Still Christian Youth Ministry

Select a Month December 2025 April 2025 January 2025 September 2023 September 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 November 2021 October 2021 May 2021 February 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 June 2019 March 2019 January 2019 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did God put in Isaiah's mouth in his vision to cleanse his lips?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Honey Oil A scroll A burning coal