Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Liberal Protestants, Social Justice and Antisemitism: Reflections on the BDS Movement

Liberal Protestants, Social Justice and Antisemitism: Reflections on the BDS Movement

Last updated on: July 15, 2015 at 5:10 pm by Deborah Arca

4 Comments

Liberal Protestants, Social Justice and Antisemitism: Reflections on the BDS Movement 2015-07-15T17:10:58+00:00 Deborah Arca

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Mark E. Gammon

With the astounding pace of news over the last couple of weeks, it was easy to miss one small item. The United Church of Christ became the latest liberal Protestant denomination to endorse “boycotts and divestment from companies that profit from Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands.” As David Palumbo-Liu recently reported at Salon.com, the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement has made substantive inroads in the mainline American Protestant denominations, with resolutions either passed or under discussion by the Presbyterian Church (USA), the United Methodist Church, the Episcopal Church, and others.

Palumbo-Liu’s piece is misleading in two respects. First, he suggests that the churches are only recently jumping on board with an established campus movement, but the Presbyterians, for instance, have been discussing divestment in the name of Palestinian rights for over a decade. Second, he suggests that the BDS movement is having a real impact, leading Binyamin Netanyahu to denounce it as a “strategic threat.” It is true that BDS has made Israeli leadership take notice, but not in the way that Palumbo-Liu implies. The economic impact of such divestment is miniscule, and in responding to the movement, Netanyahu shows concern about a very different kind of threat.

According to Israeli government spokespersons, the prime minister’s remarks were prompted by “moral outrage” over Israel being singled out for such criticism (in particular, recent efforts by Palestinian activists to kick Israel out of FIFA). Netanyahu is making a much broader claim – that this special focus on Israel’s actions toward the Palestinian people is antisemitic, and thus indicative of the ongoing existential threat to the state of Israel. In fact, a number of supporters of BDS in the liberal Protestant ranks have felt the need to affirm that the movement is not antisemitic, but rather a simple matter of social justice for an oppressed people. One need not agree with Israel’s actions toward Palestine, however, to evaluate the charge. Is the BDS movement in the Church antisemitic?

The short answer is yes. While well-meaning, the BDS movement among Christian denominations is, mostly unintentionally, antisemitic.

As noted, these strategies have little practical effect. We can divest, but there are always other investors. We can boycott, but boycotts rarely matter economically. They also have long proven morally problematic because of who really suffers and the assigning of moral accountability to an entire nation. Academic boycotts have been seen to prevent scholars critical of Netanyahu’s government from international exchanges. In other words, these strategies are as likely to backfire as they are to accomplish anything substantive.

However, a witness need not be practically effective in order to be justified act of faithfulness. Even the great realist Reinhold Niebuhr gave a respectful nod toward the Anabaptist pacifist traditions as reminders of the sinful finitude of the purveyors of justice. It is clear that the churches intend BDS as a witness to social justice on behalf of an oppressed people. Taken purely at face value, it is a important point – and, theologically, it makes absolute sense. As Christians, we should stand with the oppressed. (We also are called to suffer with them, though BDS actions do not speak to that imperative.) Surely, the least we can do as faithful witnesses of Christ is denounce the horrendous actions that a more powerful people inflict upon those weaker than they.

Unfortunately, witness is not that simple. However righteous the intention behind the witness, we still need to evaluate the effectiveness as witness. Here is where the Christian advocates of BDS display a breathtaking lack of historical consciousness. In a vacuum, the condemnation of Israel’s actions may be perfectly justified, but as recent debates over the Confederate battle flag have shown, context is everything when it comes to symbols. Witness, in its essence, is symbolic action, and such action has not only a political, but also an historical context. In this case, Christians cannot simply say wrong is wrong and must be denounced, because to do so is to ignore the fact that the modern state of Israel is a product of the antisemitic moral failings of Western Christendom itself.

I am not trying to say that modern Christians cannot denounce the actions of Jews simply because they are Jewish. The problem is singling out Israel as a special object of moral opprobrium while failing to acknowledge the Church’s role in cultivating a sense of existential threat among Jews. If Christian BDS supporters have to make a point of clarifying that they are not being antisemitic, certainly something has gone awry. Specifically, divestment does not function as a witness to peace or social justice, but rather is a proclamation of Christian moral superiority over Jews. The standing for that type of criticism disappeared shortly after Constantine.

It is hard to explain why Israel’s treatment of Palestinians has become a central liberal Protestant cause, but with worldwide antisemitism on the rise from the extreme right and the extreme left, the BDS movement is surely the wrong place to make this particular moral stand at this time. Have these denominations turned toward their own government’s moral failings? Have we divested from those who do business with the United States military, recognized by many worldwide as a tool of oppression? For that matter, have we given real thought to the fact that our ability to divest is predicated on our participation in an investment banking system that privileges profits over people – and has shown more than its fair share of moral and legal evil?

What BDS does is deflect the world’s attention from the Church’s hypocrisy with regard to economics, warfare, and the Jews. Theologically, that’s tough to justify. We certainly should work with our Abrahamic siblings to find justice and peace. We should pray for Palestine and Israel, and the best kinds of witness in that context are those that foster friendships and cooperation between those peoples. However, when it comes to the Church’s failure to be agents of justice, we better serve our mission to the world by turning critical eyes on ourselves as oppressors. Prophets properly arise from the people they condemn.

Mark E. Gammon is the Matthew Simpson Professor of Religion at Simpson College in Indianola, Iowa. He obtained an M.Div. from Duke Divinity School and a Ph.D. in moral theology from Boston College.

Israel-Palestine

Anti-semitism

BDS

Boycott Divestment and Sanctions

Israel-Palestine

Judaism

liberal christianity

progressive christianity

social justice

Previous Post

July 13, 2015

Tapping the Millennial Imagination: On FAO Schwarz, Don Quixote, and the Dying Church

Next Post

July 17, 2015 "There Is a Wide, Wide Wonder In It All": The Blessing of Black Fathers

Recent Comments

4 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Author Interviews Battle Over the Body and Blood of Christ Bearing Beauty Book Reviews Christian Education christian spirituallity christianity Christmas Church Church Leadership Contemplation Creation Care Death and Dying Death Penalty Disruptive Change Disruptors Series Easter Education Evolution and Faith Future of Progressive Christianity Gun Violence Health & Wellness Holy Week Interfaith Israel-Palestine Leading Differently Lent LGBTQ Living with Cancer Meditations on the Cross Mental Illness millennials Mimetic Mondays Monday Meditations Movie Reviews New Monasticism Pando Populus Parenting Patheos 10+1 Q&A Series PC(USA) Politics Pop Culture Practical Theology Series Prayer progressive christian Race Relations Reformation religion Religion and Politics Religion in America Rethink Church Social Justice Spirituality Spirituality of the Body Stump a Scholar Technology and Faith Thanksgiving Theodicy Trust Me Church Uncategorized Why I'm Still Christian Youth Ministry

Select a Month December 2025 April 2025 January 2025 September 2023 September 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 November 2021 October 2021 May 2021 February 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 June 2019 March 2019 January 2019 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Absalom was David's son who led a rebellion against him.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE