Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Is Theology a Technology?

Is Theology a Technology?

Last updated on: February 27, 2015 at 3:38 pm by Clint Schnekloth

3 Comments

Is Theology a Technology? 2015-02-27T15:38:55+00:00 Clint Schnekloth

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This post finds its origins in a tweet:

“Theology is a technology.” – @IdeasDoneDaily /// Chewing on that. #newmediaproject #chsocm

— David L Hansen (@rev_david) February 23, 2015

After a bit of reflection, I had a response:

@expatminister @rev_david @IdeasDoneDaily Yeah, I’m going to go ahead and say that theology is NOT a technology. #newmediaproject #chsocm

— Clint Schnekloth (@Schnekloth) February 23, 2015

However, the question has left me puzzling over the two terms. Even if equating theology with technology, or labeling theology as a kind of technology, fails the test of helpfulness, the comparison itself does clarify the two terms. In fact, it sent me scurrying to develop a better definition of technology so I could articulate precisely why I believe theology is not a technology.

At the most basic level, theology is not a technology because technology, traditionally construed, is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes. Technology is an applied science. Theology is closer to, in Aristotelian terms, either theory or poesis. Theology is creative, a kind of intellectual “seeing.”

So we might say that you can have a theology of technology. And technology can influence what kinds of theologies emerge. But at least classically construed, to call theology a technology is to confuse things the Greek philosophers helpfully distinguished one from another.

At this point, I run into a problem. To really think through technology and theology, I know I have to deal with Heidegger. But dealing with Heidegger is awkward, on many levels. Of course there is the issue of his complicity with National Socialism. Then there is simply the problem that Heidegger is not easy to understand.

That being said, there is no getting around Heidegger’s meditations on technology as they relate to modern life. I may be oversimplifying Heidegger here (remember, I do not always find him completely easy to understand), but I think we could say that for Heidegger, the issue with technology is that it constricts our view of the world. We have begun to see the whole world technologically, the whole world and even human beings as simply raw materials for technical operations (for a great summary of Heidegger’s thought on technology, see http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/understanding-heidegger-on-technology).

Perhaps we might better argue that technology is replacing theology in modern thought, or at least that we are turning all of what used to amount to theology into technique.

The origins of this shift, at least in North America, can be traced back to revivalism. Charles Finney, one of the great 19th century evangelists, is (in)famous for applying scientific technique to revival. In his Lectures on Revival, he wrote that revival “is a purely philosophical result of the right use of the constitutional means.”

The shift here in Finney is from the content of preaching and worship to the procedure and technique. It isn’t that Finney completely abandoned the content of the faith–it’s simply that he began to approach the effectiveness of revival through technique, the right measures at the right time to effect the desired result.

Much of modern evangelism in North America simply takes the measures Finney developed for granted. North American Christians live and breathe a Christian movement that has for the most part adopted this shift from theology to technique.

To label theology a technology becomes problematic precisely in the Heideggerian sense, because Heidegger feared (rightly) that our technological worldview results in approaching everything as a “standing reserve” we can appropriate for our purposes. If theology is a technology, it is just one more thing among things, one more tool at our disposal to pick up or discard as we wish.

What Heidegger accomplishes in his lectures on technology is a reversal of terms. If technology becomes all encompassing, then all our attempts to step outside of the technological frame fail because we are still applying technology to step outside of it. For Heidegger, technology is one, but only one, way of revealing, of bringing truth out.

The revealing of truth isn’t a half-bad definition of theology, and if that’s the definition of theology, that’s a very good reason not to label theology a technology. Theology contains technology rather than the other way around, we might say. Even Finney, who relied heavily on the technologies of revival, likely believed that it was not the techniques themselves that revealed the truth, but rather the techniques became tools through which the self-revealing of truth might happen (Lord have mercy, that sounds Barthian, but I hope you get the drift).

We are left with some rather perplexing considerations, not all of which can be worked out easily. It isn’t entirely clear what technology is, or what theology is, which is precisely why students of both are always again and again debating the definition of the fundamental terms. In an era when technology takes up greater and greater amounts of our reflection, and dominates our daily life, the question of the relationship between theology and technology is essential.

But let’s not equate the two until we have a better understanding of whether one contains the other. Screen Shot 2015-02-27 at 9.36.06 AM

Technology and Faith

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 26, 2015

I Might Be The World's Worst Evangelist

Next Post

February 27, 2015 Women, the Death Penalty, and Jesus

Recent Comments

3 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Author Interviews Battle Over the Body and Blood of Christ Bearing Beauty Book Reviews Christian Education christian spirituallity christianity Christmas Church Church Leadership Contemplation Creation Care Death and Dying Death Penalty Disruptive Change Disruptors Series Easter Education Evolution and Faith Future of Progressive Christianity Gun Violence Health & Wellness Holy Week Interfaith Israel-Palestine Leading Differently Lent LGBTQ Living with Cancer Meditations on the Cross Mental Illness millennials Mimetic Mondays Monday Meditations Movie Reviews New Monasticism Pando Populus Parenting Patheos 10+1 Q&A Series PC(USA) Politics Pop Culture Practical Theology Series Prayer progressive christian Race Relations Reformation religion Religion and Politics Religion in America Rethink Church Social Justice Spirituality Spirituality of the Body Stump a Scholar Technology and Faith Thanksgiving Theodicy Trust Me Church Uncategorized Why I'm Still Christian Youth Ministry

Select a Month December 2025 April 2025 January 2025 September 2023 September 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 November 2021 October 2021 May 2021 February 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 June 2019 March 2019 January 2019 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book of the Bible contains the genealogy of Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Matthew Mark Luke John