Practical Theology: Seeing the Flaws

Last updated on: July 29, 2014 at 3:04 pm by Aric Clark

Practical Theology: Seeing the Flaws 2014-07-29T15:04:49+00:00 Aric Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We got the authors of three recent books of practical theology together and asked them to bang their ideas around to see what interesting overlaps and contrasts emerged. Andrew Root of Luther Seminary recently wrote Christopraxis: A Practical Theology of the Cross. Mark Van Steenwyk, founder of the Mennonite Worke Community, wrote The UNkingdom of God: Embracing the Subversive Power of Repentance. The guys from Two Friars and a Fool, Aric Clark, Doug Hagler, and Nick Larson wrote Never Pray Again: Lift Your Head, Unfold Your Hands, and Get to Work

by Two Friars And A Fool

We’re going last in this second round of our series on Practical Theology. The object here is to use the excellent books that Andrew and Mark wrote to critique our own work in Never Pray Again. This strikes us as a difficult undertaking which Andrew and Mark both pulled off with aplomb. Difficult, not because our book is so above approach, but because it is tempting to list all the things we love about Christopraxis and UNkingdom, and indulge in criticism of a bunch of books that Never Pray Again is not and was never intended to be. It’ll be much more interesting if we can manage to think critically about the book that Never Pray Again actually is and how it could be more that taking lessons from our friends’ books.

Lets look first to Andrew Root’s book Christopraxis. As we already mentioned in the first round of this series, Andrew focuses in on divine action, particularly taking people’s experiences of divine action in their lives seriously as a subject for practical theology. We’re skeptics about most of what people call miraculous or mystical experience and we were specifically aiming for a book that was laser-focused on neighbor-centered active faith. For most of the book we bracket out divine action to focus exclusively on the actions of the practitioner. We conclude our chapter on intercessory prayer this way:

Your intercession is too urgently required for you to waste time on your knees, whispering words to a deity you imagine to be distant. God is right beside you, right now. Not in some mystical otherworldly sense, but in the hungry person you have a chance to feed; the thirsty person you could give a cup of water to; the naked person you could clothe; the sick person you could care for; the prisoner you could be visiting… For the sake of the everyday hero that lives inside you it is best if you assume that God will not intercede without you. There is no one about to come down out of the sky, cape fluttering, and relieve you of your responsibility to do what must be done.

After reading Andrew’s book we think our own is insufficiently theological, and there is a way we could improve upon it while keeping our focus on active neighbor-centered faith. It’s right there in our quote above: we locate God in our neighbor. We spent the entire book writing about how we should act given the conviction that God is found in our neighbor and we didn’t really ask, what might God being doing in and through our neighbor to minister to us?

Andrew’s interest in divine action as an expression of God’s ministry to us isn’t disembodied or supernatural of necessity. If it is true that what we do to the least of these we do to God, might it also be true that some of what the least of these do to us is the work of God? At the very least it seems an interesting question, and one we leave unexplored. Guess we’ll have to keep writing.

UNkingdom is a book with an aim and style more similar to ours making it easier to compare, and easier therefore to notice where we went horribly, shockingly, embarrassingly wrong. Mark’s book is politically subversive. He takes aim at the ideological foundation of the reader with the goal of not only changing the reader, but changing the society. The trajectory of Mark’s own story told in anecdotes throughout the book bear witness to this. His journey leads him from a certain kind of Christian community through repentance into creating a different kind of Christian community, the Mennonite Worker.

When you read Never Pray Again (yep, we’re just gonna assume that), you will probably glean things about our politics, and if you were to engage the practices we suggest it would have broader social ramifications on your life, but for all that the book is tragically individualistic. It’s a relational book in the sense that we’re concerned with how you should treat your neighbor, but it almost exclusively focuses on what you (second person singular) can do as an individual. We don’t really discuss communal action.

The irony here is that we fell prey to one of the problems with prayer. We criticize prayer as being too individualistic. Our goal is to draw the reader outside of themselves and to get them focused on their neighbor. Yet by dedicating the entire book to what an individual could do which is better than praying we never quite got out of that gravity well.

What would it look like to engage the experiments we include at the ends of chapters as a community, rather than as an individual? There are communities founded on prayer, what would communities founded on feeding, or healing, or expelling, or interceding look like? Even as we type this, already existing communities which are examples of these behaviors are springing to mind. Communities we could have, and should have, explored.

No book is ever perfect, and the only reason a book is ever done is because otherwise it would never be printed and read. We’re proud of Never Pray Again and glad that we’re still thinking about it, and seeing ways it could be even better.

Two Friars and a Fool is the result of a heady mix of alcohol, sleep deprivation and the kind of hubris that makes blogging seem like a good way to contribute to society. Aric Clark is religious but not spiritual, and inflicts that religion on a congregation in Fort Morgan, Colorado. He is an over-functioning Enneagram 8 shouting at the universe from his pulpit. Doug Hagler is a deep-water Facebook argument-trawler who wants to open up the canon and add the collected works of J.R.R. Tolkien. As a fatbeard-at-large in Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, he lives out his calling to design role-playing games and write things on the Internet while pretending to actually work. Nick Larson is a post-doctrinal, post-modern hipster who messes it all up by wearing Star Wars shirts non-ironically. He is always reading every book he can find with the word “Toward” in the title, and is currently teaching rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock to disciples in Columbia, MO. These three published a book entitled Never Pray Again: Lift Your Head, Unfold Your Hands, and Get to Work, which aims to turn individualistic internalized spiritual practices into concrete neighbor-focused habits. They tell themselves that only one of them is the Fool, but they are wrong.

Practical Theology Series

christianity

practical theology

praxis

progressive christianity

spirituality

Previous Post

July 28, 2014

When the Battle Is Hard: On Restoration and Renewal of Faith

Next Post

July 31, 2014 Practical Theology: The Buried Mystericism of Childhood

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Author Interviews Battle Over the Body and Blood of Christ Bearing Beauty Book Reviews Christian Education christian spirituallity christianity Christmas Church Church Leadership Contemplation Creation Care Death and Dying Death Penalty Disruptive Change Disruptors Series Easter Education Evolution and Faith Future of Progressive Christianity Gun Violence Health & Wellness Holy Week Interfaith Israel-Palestine Leading Differently Lent LGBTQ Living with Cancer Meditations on the Cross Mental Illness millennials Mimetic Mondays Monday Meditations Movie Reviews New Monasticism Pando Populus Parenting Patheos 10+1 Q&A Series PC(USA) Politics Pop Culture Practical Theology Series Prayer progressive christian Race Relations Reformation religion Religion and Politics Religion in America Rethink Church Social Justice Spirituality Spirituality of the Body Stump a Scholar Technology and Faith Thanksgiving Theodicy Trust Me Church Uncategorized Why I'm Still Christian Youth Ministry

Select a Month December 2025 April 2025 January 2025 September 2023 September 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 November 2021 October 2021 May 2021 February 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 June 2019 March 2019 January 2019 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: According to 1 John, God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE