Mimetic Mondays: Does God Create Evil? Mimetic Theory and Isaiah 45:7

Last updated on: February 6, 2015 at 11:55 pm by Adam Ericksen

3 Comments

Mimetic Mondays: Does God Create Evil? Mimetic Theory and Isaiah 45:7 2015-02-06T23:55:15+00:00 Adam Ericksen

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We recently received a message on the Raven Foundation Facebook Page that raised a great question about God and evil. Below is the question and my response. I’d love to know how you would respond to this question!

The Question: …I’ve enjoyed your blog as well and the studies on the Bible are wonderful. I wanted to ask you about a text in Isaiah 45:7 that states that God is the author of evil. How can I interpret it with a Mimetic hermeneutic?

Isaiah 45:7: “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.” (King James Version)

My Response: The question about Isaiah 45:7 is such an important one and I would love to hear your thoughts on it! Part of the problem might be translation. The King James Version translated the Hebrew word “ra” as evil, but more modern translations have it as “woe”, “disaster” and “discord”. The word can be translated in many ways, but it does seem to have negative connotations. Raymund Schwager wrote a great book called Must There Be Scapegoats?: Violence and Redemption in the Bible. I think it’s the first book to take up a mimetic interpretation of the Bible. I highly recommend it. He says that in much of the Bible there is an assumption that God’s “punishment” for evil is that evil falls back upon evil doers. Schwager doesn’t specifically quote Isaiah 45:7, but he does have a long section on Second Isaiah, where verse 45:7 comes from. He says, “Yahweh himself does not punish, nor does he use other human beings to destroy evil doers. Rather, their punishment is that they become victims of their own crimes” (60). With this interpretation, God creates the world in such a way that good comes back on the good and evil comes back on the evil. So, one could say that God passively “creates” evil in allowing evil to fall back on us. Schwager writes that with this interpretation, “God’s arm strikes the evildoers in such a way that the wicked fall into the very fires that they themselves have started” (66).

That might be what 45:7 is getting at, but that idea is also critiqued in much of the Bible. In fact, it’s critiqued in Second Isaiah itself! Schwager points out that in the Suffering Servant we find something else. Here, the community’s “evil deeds fall on him” – the Suffering Servant (132). In other words, their evil does not fall back upon themselves, but instead is directed against the Suffering Servant like a magnet. Schwager then states that, “The writings of Second Isaiah contain the clearest expression in the Old Testament of the transfer of many violent actions onto one innocent individual” (133).

That these two notions are contained within Second Isaiah fits with Girard’s claim that the Bible is a “text in travail,” or struggle, over what it means for God to be God. Over the course of the Bible, we find it struggling with what Girard calls “archaic religions.” Archaic religions of sacrifice say that the gods are a mixture of both good and evil. Sometimes we see that idea in biblical notions of God, but the Bible also argues against it.

So, what’s the answer? Schwager points to Jesus who, “did not cast some universal harm back upon the heads of the many evil doers. Instead, he took this collective evil deed entirely upon himself and transformed it in his own body by his nonviolent and forgiving love” (212). Jesus is like the Suffering Servant and he reveals that the problem of evil is a human creation. God’s solution is to take the consequences of our evil and violence upon himself and forgive us in return. In Jesus we find that God causes the rain and the sun to fall on the just and the unjust alike. We usually assume that the rain is punishment for the wicked and the sun a reward for the righteous, but in that region of the world, rain is sorely needed for nourishment in the dessert, and, of course, the sun is also needed for growth. So, in Jesus God is merciful toward all. On the cross he responded to human evil with divine forgiveness and grace. So, whereas Isaiah 45:7 might say that God “creates” evil to fall back on the evil, in Jesus we see that grace falls back on the evil. That, I suppose, is good news for all of us!

It is because of Jesus and his revelation of God’s love that 1 John can make the statement “God is love” and “God is light and in him there is no darkness at all.” Throughout the Bible we find the teasing out of good and evil from God, so that in Jesus we can say that God is love/light without room for evil. Thus, evil is something humans create, not God.

That’s my really long answer to your really great question! When you have a moment I’d love to hear how you would respond to Isaiah 45:7.

Grace and peace,
Adam

Adam Ericksen blogs at the Raven Foundation, where he uses mimetic theory to provide social commentary on religion, politics, and pop culture. Follow Adam on Twitter @adamericksen.

Previous Post

April 4, 2014

The Cross, Part 5: What is it Good For?

Next Post

April 9, 2014 Blessing Taxes, Honoring Oaths

Recent Comments

3 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Author Interviews Battle Over the Body and Blood of Christ Bearing Beauty Book Reviews Christian Education christian spirituallity christianity Christmas Church Church Leadership Contemplation Creation Care Death and Dying Death Penalty Disruptive Change Disruptors Series Easter Education Evolution and Faith Future of Progressive Christianity Gun Violence Health & Wellness Holy Week Interfaith Israel-Palestine Leading Differently Lent LGBTQ Living with Cancer Meditations on the Cross Mental Illness millennials Mimetic Mondays Monday Meditations Movie Reviews New Monasticism Pando Populus Parenting Patheos 10+1 Q&A Series PC(USA) Politics Pop Culture Practical Theology Series Prayer progressive christian Race Relations Reformation religion Religion and Politics Religion in America Rethink Church Social Justice Spirituality Spirituality of the Body Stump a Scholar Technology and Faith Thanksgiving Theodicy Trust Me Church Uncategorized Why I'm Still Christian Youth Ministry

Select a Month December 2025 April 2025 January 2025 September 2023 September 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 November 2021 October 2021 May 2021 February 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 June 2019 March 2019 January 2019 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Barnabas" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Son of encouragement Faithful one Son of thunder Gifted one