Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Mimetic Mondays: 2013 Scandals – Attraction, Repulsion, and the Top 5 Ways to Become Scandal-less in 2014

Mimetic Mondays: 2013 Scandals – Attraction, Repulsion, and the Top 5 Ways to Become Scandal-less in 2014

Last updated on: February 7, 2015 at 12:09 am by Adam Ericksen

10 Comments

Mimetic Mondays: 2013 Scandals – Attraction, Repulsion, and the Top 5 Ways to Become Scandal-less in 2014 2015-02-07T00:09:59+00:00 Adam Ericksen

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As defined by mimetic theory, scandal gives offense and arouses indignation. Mimetic theory spells out its interactive core, involving a complex or structure of interpersonal relations that extends to all levels of social organization. From the Greek word meaning “stumbling block,” scandal names the offense that our conduct gives to others and that insidiously trips them up, as it models their hostile conduct towards us, whether it is by reproving or replicating, that is, unwittingly miming our own. Scandal names the other as fascinating obstacle.

This definition highlights the mirroring and multiplying effect of scandal as our offense and indignation is increased by the offenders’ defense of their actions followed by the enhancement of their defense to our growing horror and shock. This whiplashing of emotions provides a frisson that we simultaneously relish and despise. Since the shelf-life of high emotions is brief, the year end offers a great time to reflect on the scandals that gripped us and how to enter the next year with a new equanimity when scandal offers its enticements.

On the Raven website, the most scandalizing of scandals was Miley Cryus’ appearance on MTV’s Video Music Awards. Adam Ericksen wisely defused this scandal whose outrage was fueled by a young woman previously perceived as innocent being sex-ploited. In a 2010 interview of Cyrus in Harpers Bazaar, her statement, “People like controversy because that’s what sells” seems to suggest a certain marketing shrewdness that belies her youth. Take a moment to reflect, is your blood still boiling?

Edward Snowden’s scandalous revelation of NSA spying trailed Miley in popularity but seems to be a gift that never stops giving. Every week to ten days new information spills out that generates another flurry of frenzied patriotism or liberal paranoia. Suzanne Ross’ examination, Edward Snowden: Traitor or Whistle Blower?, revealed this as a litmus test of our moral values. Are you still outraged?

America’s scandal of gun violence wrought horror after horror throughout the year. Adam Ericksen’s thoughtful piece, Stand Your Ground and America’s Social Crisis, highlighted the inevitable escalation of violence and showed a way to escape. Still dead sure about who has the right to stand their ground?

Angelina Jolie and Kim Kardashian rounded out the top five scandals on our website for their unacceptable treatment of their own bodies. In Angelina’s Mastectomy Scandal, Suzanne Ross examined the ownership fans feel for their favorite stars and their outrage at any deviation in look or demeanor. A pregnant Kim Kardashian shocked tabloid readers with her weight gain. Adam Ericksen reviewed their outrage in OMG!!! Kim Kardashian Gains Weight During Pregnancy!!! as one expression of the continued objectification of women. Still itching to write an op ed for the Star Tabloid?

If you noticed how unimportant these scandals seem now, Adam Ericksen offers a list of five wise practices for avoiding the “stumbling block” of scandal. Wishing you a scandal-less 2014! ~ Maura

Adam’s Top Five Practices for Becoming Scandal-less in 2014

5. James Warren provides an excellent reflection of “scandal” in his book Compassion or Apocalypse? A Comprehensive Guide to the Thought of René Girard. Maura’s description of scandal was great, and is confirmed by James when he writes that “To be scandalized is…to be in a double-bind state: both attracted and repelled at the same time.” Of course, whenever I’m scandalized it’s easy to sense my repulsion as I gossip with my friends about how horrible the scandalizer is, but our repulsion is only half the story. The other half, the half that is difficult to admit, is what attracts me to the scandalizer. To become less scandalized, we might ask some honest questions about those we find scandalous: Do I desire her fame? Do I desire his riches? Do I desire her power? In what ways might they be a model of success?

4. It is easy to tell when other people cause scandals, but much more difficult to tell when we cause scandals. Becoming scandal-less is a life-long process and a significant part of that process is realizing the various ways in which we become a stumbling block for others. How do we put others in a mimetic double bind? In what ways do we want to be the model of success for others – in what ways do we want others to envy our success – and in what ways might we make sure that they are not a threat to our success?

3. Part of our addiction to scandals is that it provides us with a sense of “goodness.” We know that we are good because we can all agree that someone else is scandalous. This sense of goodness is false because it is based on being over and against someone else. The popular notion of scandal, of someone transgressing cultural morality, are addictive because we can all unite with a sense of goodness over and against someone else who we all agree is bad. Here again James Warren provides us with an important reflection on how Jesus responded to those that the religious elite labeled morally questionable, “…during his ministry Jesus encountered many ethically depraved people, and was not shocked by it; on the contrary, Jesus’ behavior was shocking to many others precisely because he was willing to associate with characters considered unscrupulous or depraved.” Sometimes people need a little shock. So when the next scandal comes, don’t play the false goodness game. Instead, be like Jesus and become schockingly un-shocked about it.

2. Whenever I feel scandalized by someone, it’s usually because they have something that I want. Bloggers, myself included, are notorious for this scandalous trap. We constantly compare our numbers with other bloggers. It’s the idolatry of success. We wonder, “How many visits is he getting?” “How many Facebook likes and Tweets did she get?” Resentment breeds in the blogosphere, but it also breeds in the workplace, in the neighborhood, and at home. Whenever I find myself scandalized by envy and resentment for someone’s success, I remind myself that God is for everyone, including this person. Being against this person is my problem, not God’s. Once I realize this, I can begin the process of accepting that God is for me and for this person at the same time. And then I can begin the process of being for this person, too.

1. Jesus said, “Occasions for stumbling are bound to come.” Jesus prepared his disciples for the stumbling block of scandals. Scandals are human and so they are bound to come. We are bound to become scandalized by famous people, co-workers, friends, family, and neighbors. We are also bound to cause some scandals ourselves. Jesus prepared his disciples for the inevitability of scandals so they would become less scandalized by them. But Jesus did more than that. He connected the inevitability of scandals with a radical forgiveness when he told his disciples to forgive, “Not seven times…but seventy-seven times.” The best way to live scandal-less in 2014 is to live into the spirit of God’s radical forgiveness – to receive God’s forgiveness in our lives and offer that forgiveness to others.

Maura Junius is Marketing Director and occasional blogger at the Raven Foundation. Adam Ericksen also blogs at the Raven Foundation, where he and Maura use mimetic theory to provide social commentary on religion, politics, and pop culture. Follow Adam on Twitter @adamericksen and follow the Raven Foundation @ravenfoundation.

Previous Post

December 27, 2013

God's Gracious Deeds? Reflections on Isaiah 63:7-9 for December 29, 2013

Next Post

January 6, 2014 14 Hopes for 2014

Recent Comments

10 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Author Interviews Battle Over the Body and Blood of Christ Bearing Beauty Book Reviews Christian Education christian spirituallity christianity Christmas Church Church Leadership Contemplation Creation Care Death and Dying Death Penalty Disruptive Change Disruptors Series Easter Education Evolution and Faith Future of Progressive Christianity Gun Violence Health & Wellness Holy Week Interfaith Israel-Palestine Leading Differently Lent LGBTQ Living with Cancer Meditations on the Cross Mental Illness millennials Mimetic Mondays Monday Meditations Movie Reviews New Monasticism Pando Populus Parenting Patheos 10+1 Q&A Series PC(USA) Politics Pop Culture Practical Theology Series Prayer progressive christian Race Relations Reformation religion Religion and Politics Religion in America Rethink Church Social Justice Spirituality Spirituality of the Body Stump a Scholar Technology and Faith Thanksgiving Theodicy Trust Me Church Uncategorized Why I'm Still Christian Youth Ministry

Select a Month December 2025 April 2025 January 2025 September 2023 September 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 November 2021 October 2021 May 2021 February 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 June 2019 March 2019 January 2019 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Samuel's mother promise if God gave her a son?

Select your answer to see how you score.

To move to Jerusalem To fast for 40 days To dedicate him to the Lord To offer a burnt sacrifice