Left, Right Out of Sight, and Christ

Last updated on: November 21, 2011 at 11:48 pm by Jim Burklo

10 Comments

Left, Right Out of Sight, and Christ 2011-11-21T23:48:43+00:00 Jim Burklo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

[This post is part of a conversation at the Patheos Book Club on the new book Left, Right, and Christ: Evangelical Faith In Politics, by Lisa Sharon Harper and D.C. Innes (2011, Russell Media).]

The good news in this book: contrary to the assumptions of many, evangelicals are not of one mind on matters political.

The bad news in this book: the wing of the right-wing evangelical co-author of the book is that of a bat, not a bird.

There once was a day when a Republican was a person who was suspicious of government power but a believer in the importance of government as a force for the common good. It was a Republican, after all, who presided over the creation of the interstate highway system. It was a Republican who warned Americans about the dangers of the military-industrial complex. There was a day when Republicans were sober-minded folks who wanted good government, not eviscerated government. They fought against corrupt industrial unions, not against benign public employees’ unions. They defended the social status quo, not teaching six-day creation in public schools.

Today’s dominant members of the Republican Party have gone batty. And if you want a peek into their belfry, look no further than the half of “Left, Right, and Christ” written by D. C. Innes. His is a bizarre brew of biblical fundamentalism, discredited trickle-down economics, and radical libertarianism. His ideas are too gonzo to be put alongside those of Lisa Sharon Harper, herself hardly a leftist. She’s what used to be known as a centrist until the right went into the barely detectable realms of the electromagnetic spectrum. I admire much of what she has to say in this book, but her reflections are demeaned by being put alongside those of Innes. Here’s one of his pronouncements: “For its part, government would gladly expand to take responsibility for everything it could. It would soon have agencies for tying your shoes, blowing your nose, and tucking you in at night. People would become ever more narrowly selfish and childishly dependent.” (p 63) Is there another agency that Rick Perry forgot that should be abolished – the Department of Runny Noses? Is there anybody, anywhere on the political spectrum, suggesting anything even remotely close to that kind of governmental intrusion on matters of personal responsibility? Innes makes a mockery of the premise of the book. It should be titled “Reasonable, Totally Whacked-Out, and Christ”.

For too long, the conservative movement in this country has defined the parameters of political discourse. We see it at work in the skewed version of “fair and balanced” practiced by Fox News. Conservatives define who is right and who is left so that the center is painted as the left. Then the right can be as far-out as it wants. This book falls neatly into that trap. Defining a decidedly uncontroversial writer like Lisa Sharon Harper as a leftist, in contrast to the hyperbolic D. C. Innes, makes the evangelical world look weirder than it really is.

This book doesn’t describe the true diversity of political viewpoints in theologically conservative Christianity. There are plenty of true centrists, and plenty of true leftists, among evangelical Christians. We should not take this book’s bait and assume that half the evangelical world has lost contact with reality. This big constituency can be reached – and ought to be reached – with the gospel message of social justice.

(For more discussion of this book, see: http://www.patheos.com/Book-Club/Harper-and-Innes-Left-Right-Christ.html )

The Rev. Jim Burklo is Associate Dean of Religious Life, University of Southern California. He blogs at Musings.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 16, 2011

The Big Interfaith Tent at Occupy Oakland

Next Post

November 21, 2011 Why We Need Advent

Recent Comments

10 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Author Interviews Battle Over the Body and Blood of Christ Bearing Beauty Book Reviews Christian Education christian spirituallity christianity Christmas Church Church Leadership Contemplation Creation Care Death and Dying Death Penalty Disruptive Change Disruptors Series Easter Education Evolution and Faith Future of Progressive Christianity Gun Violence Health & Wellness Holy Week Interfaith Israel-Palestine Leading Differently Lent LGBTQ Living with Cancer Meditations on the Cross Mental Illness millennials Mimetic Mondays Monday Meditations Movie Reviews New Monasticism Pando Populus Parenting Patheos 10+1 Q&A Series PC(USA) Politics Pop Culture Practical Theology Series Prayer progressive christian Race Relations Reformation religion Religion and Politics Religion in America Rethink Church Social Justice Spirituality Spirituality of the Body Stump a Scholar Technology and Faith Thanksgiving Theodicy Trust Me Church Uncategorized Why I'm Still Christian Youth Ministry

Select a Month December 2025 April 2025 January 2025 September 2023 September 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 November 2021 October 2021 May 2021 February 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 June 2019 March 2019 January 2019 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: The Israelites were commanded to observe the Day of Atonement once a year.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE