Praying The Future

Last updated on: July 5, 2010 at 10:55 pm by Jason Derr

1,168 Comments

Praying The Future 2010-07-05T22:55:58+00:00 Jason Derr

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Church of The Church?

Phillip Clayton of Claremont School of Theology says that the future of the church over the next 20 years will not secured by new and emerging forms of theology, but in ecclesiology. By this he means it is in how we DO CHURCH that is important. While we can expect the continued decline of Christianity in culture we can also expect new pockets of vitality and experience to emerge. Prayer, liturgy and worship will, more than anything, be the churches future.

With the decline of the traditional, institutional church those of us who remain in the faith will have to come to hard decisions about whom we are, why we do what we do and to what ends. We will no longer be the social safety-net or cultural ritual provider for the world but will instead be pockets of cultural oddness that flourish under strange conditions.

Clayton names the churches future as:

Churches that meet in pubs, office buildings, school classrooms, or homes … or virtual churches, like those at SecondLife.com;
Churches that have no leader, or have leaders who don’t look like any pastor you’ve ever known (OMG, what if they have piercings?);
Pastors who are hosts to discussions, who can listen long and deep to doubts and questions before presenting the answers on which they center their lives;
Churches that don’t have buildings, denominations, pastors, or sermons; that don’t meet on Sundays; that consist mainly of people who don’t call themselves “Christians.”
Churches whose participants are drawn from many different religious groups; churches full of “seekers”; churches that consist mostly of silence (like the Quakers) or of heated discussions between participants.

In Part Clayton is describing a movement very similar to what John Heron suggests in his book ‘Participatory Spirituality’. Heron seeks to envision spiritual organizations and groups inspired by a peer2peer, open source world of distributed networks. Heron imagines a world where peer groups seek not to create communities of absolute answers but of traveling partners who share in a community life where each member contributes from their experiences into the Commons as a resource for all.

In Connectivist theory – sometimes called peer2peer theory, Open Source theory or wikinomics – peer production considered a third mode of production, in opposition to capitalism and communism. In peer production we are not concerned with monetary gain (though it can happen) or central control (though community it is an community centered economic). The concern is a cultural product – music, media, text, ideas that are endlessly remix able. In Open Source a community forms around an idea – SETI@HOME and the Mars data for NASA, creating Linux, contributing to an open source, peer produced movie. The raw data – footage, text, sound – belongs to the members of the community, which contributed, to remix and reuse, as they want, for free.

Open Source in this way is a project created by a distributed network working off a common base code. It is cultural production, which is common property to all of humanity. Recent articles in Wired have even called this move a new form of production that rivals and pushes back against communism and capitalism. Hierarchies and leadership arises organically as a group of people come together to become partners in production.

In this way spirituality is allot like an OpenSource cultural creation. The contributions by tradition, history of the members provide a base code, which inspires our own remix, experimentation, and innovation that in turn is contributed back into the commons. Hierarchy and leadership then become peer created and spontaneous in order to respond to projects, situations and needs. Like the Internet groups can connect around issues that need energy and bring them into the whole as a contribution to the Commons. While it will take a hundred years of death for the Episcopal church to get to this place newer models of faith will emerge and are emerging (like the ProgCA I mentioned above) for which this model will be their default operating system, even if in a fumbling sort of way.

Just as the current environmental movement is indebted to the hippies and their ‘leftist’ and ‘wonky’ ideas the church of the next generation – in progressive and conservative forms – will be indebted to those churches and organizations that have thrived through experimentation and innovation. In part this will be house churches and post-denominational networks and in part it will be groups like the Metropolitan Community Church, which has led the way in LGBT inclusion in church as well as holding together diverse worship and liturgy styles.

The Future of Faith is Prayer?

Clayton and Heron both point out that spirituality as shared, communal event will be the future of faith. Ecclesiology – how we do church – is where Clayton sees the vital energies of the future emerging. Can we say that what liturgical reform did for the church in the 50’s a renewal of prayer will do in the present?

Some fear that this means the loss or abandonment of Christian spirituality. The opposite is true – it means that the whole of tradition from creeds to liturgical and worship styles are ours. But they are ours not as the dry relics of tradition, or the ‘this is how we do it cause this is how we have always done it’. They are ours as living traditions that have life and vitality and a responsibility to take seriously the ground conditions and experiences of our lives.

I have heard it said that the evangelical church has the energy to reengage our spiritual longings and quests in the contemporary age, but the mainline church has the tools, resources and rituals. The future of Christian spirituality is not at the expense of our uniqueness but will be due to it. But it will take the energy of the evangelicals and the intellectual tradition and spirituality resources of the mainline to make it happen.

Vitality in the future will not come from new theology – though that will be important – but it will come from asking the question of how we pray and what is church. As a student in seminary I felt great pains at the divisions – imagined, imposed and insisted on – between the MA program (academics) and the M.Div program (future ministers). Many an M.Div felt their was no room for them in the theology classes, as their options were to continue to insist on the beauty, vitality and worth of tradition, prayer and ministry. Or they could become an academic. If we are not insisting on a methodological pluralism for our seminarians – where the seminarian is asked to pray and imagine their ideas in worship – then we have already insisted that the church has no need surviving any further in this century.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 5, 2010

Electing a new Presbyterian Moderator, or Habemus Mamam

Next Post

July 6, 2010 Gratitude: A Spiritual Practice

Recent Comments

1,168 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Author Interviews Battle Over the Body and Blood of Christ Bearing Beauty Book Reviews Christian Education christian spirituallity christianity Christmas Church Church Leadership Contemplation Creation Care Death and Dying Death Penalty Disruptive Change Disruptors Series Easter Education Evolution and Faith Future of Progressive Christianity Gun Violence Health & Wellness Holy Week Interfaith Israel-Palestine Leading Differently Lent LGBTQ Living with Cancer Meditations on the Cross Mental Illness millennials Mimetic Mondays Monday Meditations Movie Reviews New Monasticism Pando Populus Parenting Patheos 10+1 Q&A Series PC(USA) Politics Pop Culture Practical Theology Series Prayer progressive christian Race Relations Reformation religion Religion and Politics Religion in America Rethink Church Social Justice Spirituality Spirituality of the Body Stump a Scholar Technology and Faith Thanksgiving Theodicy Trust Me Church Uncategorized Why I'm Still Christian Youth Ministry

Select a Month December 2025 April 2025 January 2025 September 2023 September 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 November 2021 October 2021 May 2021 February 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 June 2019 March 2019 January 2019 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many days did Jesus fast in the wilderness?

Select your answer to see how you score.

40 12 7 30