A Selection of Things in a Few Places at Discrete Times: Short movie notes

Last updated on: March 23, 2023 at 5:34 pm by Eve Tushnet

A Selection of Things in a Few Places at Discrete Times: Short movie notes 2023-03-23T17:34:11-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Brought to you by: pneumonia!

Let the Fire Burn: Fantastic, twisty and layered documentary about the deadly 1985 police siege at the MOVE radical compound in Philadelphia. Feels like every scene shifts your perspective on the scenes that came before. People who get only a few minutes of screen time emerge with vivid individuality. Basically a must-watch if you’re interested in Black American history, post-1968 city governance, or documentary craft. I watched it on Kanopy, for free with my library card.

Losing Ground: 1982 groundbreaking indie drama by Kathleen Collins, about anxieties and jealousies within a Black artistic couple. Seret Scott as wife Sara hides sensuality beneath a schoolmarm exterior; there’s a movie-within-the-movie which works sort of like “The Mousetrap,” and occasional weird touches like Sara’s caped co-star. It didn’t quite work for me–felt smaller than the sum of its parts, somehow, less weird than it promised, tilting somewhere between kitchen-sink and myth and never quite satisfying my desires for either. But others may vibe with it more. Another Kanopy selection.

Pray Away: Documentary about Protestant ex-gays and ex-ex-gays. I obviously am down for exposing the evils of conversion therapy, but as a work of art, this is pretty pedestrian, and as reportage, it’s mostly done better elsewhere. I really wanted to like this because it features Julie Rodgers, someone whom I like and respect a lot, and what we get of her story is quite powerful–probably the strongest element of the film.

There’s a secret subtext here about the blurred line between witness and celebrity: So many of the people here basically had their personal testimony weaponized, and a better film would explore whether and how any of them fully broke away from that model of Christian storytelling. In other words, becoming a poster child isn’t necessarily good for your spiritual life, even if the poster has a slogan far better than I’M NOT GAY AND SO CAN YOU! This is something I’m thinking a lot about, as I and others try to help gay etc Christians become mentors in their communities. How do we avoid tokenizing people? How do we protect their privacy and their relationships (while maintaining accountability)?

And finally, Pray Away begins and ends with someone who still runs a group for people who have been “delivered” from homosexuality and transgender identity. Or like, I don’t remember if he uses the term “delivered.” Which is something I should know! This new group seems to be drawing from a different set of Protestant traditions than the people we met earlier; everybody interviewed at length is white, but this new group seems to be majority-minority. Its worship style is different from the megachurchy stuff we see earlier, and its members seem way more comfortable acting, idk how to say this, swishy: They are, or seem!!!, comfortable being perceived as gay. Those all seem like differences worth exploring! Either this group is tiny enough that it just isn’t relevant in the way that Exodus is relevant (this is probably my own judgment tbh), or it’s worth talking about, and therefore its religious lineage is worth taking seriously.

Everything Everywhere All at Once: Oh man. I love splashy, willfully bizarre movies where people’s emotional state is signified by the color of their feather boas. I am extremely down for pastiche, and for stories of racial and sexual minorities. I loved the acting, esp Michelle Yeoh and Ke Huy Quan, and even Stephanie Hsu despite the fact that she’s given exactly one lugubrious note to play. A lot of the ingredients of this film should have worked for me. Instead I just think it is not good. You know how with Losing Ground I was like, “You might vibe with it though,” and I know that sounded like a cop-out, but actually I did mean that other people might see things in the movie that I missed? Intellectually I know that might also be true of EEAAO but in my heart, I know I’m right: no.

There are basically three problems here imho, and all of them are huge. The thing I noticed first is that every single emotion and thought gets explained. It is all talked out! And in the most prosaic terms. It’s like one of those awful contemporary musicals where the lyrics are like, “When you ignore me/Then I get mad!/Because anger is my coping mechanism/When I feel sad.” Justin Chang says the movie “practically does all your emoting for you,” and even that understates what happens here. We’re never given a chance to intuit the plot elements, just told, “I think when she does something strange, she can jump to another universe!” (or whatever the line is, I didn’t take notes.) We’re never given a chance to intuit relationships and emotions, just told, “You made your daughter into your enemy by putting too much pressure on her.” Shut up and let your story breathe!!!

The second thing is that the film tells so many stories that it often ends up gesturing at emotional resonance–creating a resolution that should make me feel something, so I try to feel the thing, but I’m just not there because these specific characters have speed-walked through the outline of a story rather than telling a story. The rescue of Raccacoonie, the love between the hot-dog finger ladies, these are not stories but synopses; and so what I feel is not the real emotion but a memory of feeling this emotion in response to other, better movies.

And the third thing is that the movie explains its philosophy at length and it is, “Nothing matters so be kind.” Like… okay. I’ve spent a fair amount of time on internet forums where sad lonely people try to understand how to keep going when they don’t believe that life has meaning, and I know that many things that aren’t persuasive to me can be life-saving insights for someone else. But the philosophy in EEAAO struck me as noticeably more banal than anything people on these forums have said to one another in encouragement. Maybe because EEAAO doesn’t really grapple with the problem that lots of people have tried that? Lots of people who find themselves in the nothing-matters place wind up there because they’ve tried reaching out, and been rebuffed again and again. EEAAO could have been a story that acknowledged that hard truth–maybe if it had cared more about the central couple’s divorce?–but instead it forces a triumphant sequence of reconciliations, none of which play out in unexpected ways. Idk, even something like, “Nothing matters, but you matter to me; this is what it looks like when you matter to someone” would strike me as defensible and potentially artistic, especially if there was some insight into “what it looks like.” Like, I obviously don’t believe that, but you could make art and even poignant and challenging art out of it. I have no idea how you turn “Just imagine that the people attacking you are really kissing, and then everything will turn out all right! Will your way to a happy marriage! Have you tried just trying a little harder????” into a compelling vision of kindness, let alone a reason to live.

There were a couple moments that really worked for me emotionally. Which shouldn’t be too surprising, given that this movie is an absolute flop sweat waterfall in its desperation to work for you emotionally! The moment when Evelyn, having seen the countless lives that the multiverse can offer her, rejects it all with, “I’ve always hated this place,” destroying the laundromat as a synecdoche for not just her one life but every life she ever could have had; most of the Wong Kar-Wai neon rain scenes. I think you could make a fun movie in which multiverses, martial arts, and Wong Kar-Wai pastiches were how an estranged and financially-struggling couple rediscovers their love for one another: It’s a Wonderful Lives, kind of thing. Instead, the filmmakers try to load the entire weight of life, the universe, and everything onto their movie. This is too many things on a bagel.

Googly eye on a hammer by Lenore Edman, via Wikimedia Commons and used under a Creative Commons license.

Art

gayer than a picnic basket

race

Previous Post

March 17, 2023

The King of Love My Shepherd Is: Some thoughts that are gay and also happy

Next Post

April 12, 2023 Appassionato

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was stoned to death, becoming the first Christian martyr?

Select your answer to see how you score.

James Paul Peter Stephen