Kangaroo Crush: Short movie notes

Last updated on: May 4, 2021 at 1:34 pm by Eve Tushnet

Kangaroo Crush: Short movie notes 2021-05-04T13:34:26-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Hitchcock and horror.

First up, I rewatched two films in which Ingrid Bergman plays an intensely honorable dipsomaniac. This may have been an expectations game, but I was surprised to find that I enjoyed Under Capricorn more than Notorious this time around. On an intellectual level the relationship in Notorious makes sense to me: Cary Grant’s character hides his true feelings because of emotional repression, and maybe also because he thinks undermining the Bergman character’s confidence will commit her more deeply to prove herself through her mission. He’s a mess, and she responds to his mess with a kind of spite-virtue indistinguishable from self-loathing, and in theory I like that; I also like the showy camera angles, especially because they make it so clear that whenever Bergman’s on screen we’re within her character’s pov and on her side. But I just did not feel any chemistry between our leads. Bergman always tends toward the stiff and actressy, and Grant just didn’t strike sparks off her.

Under Capricorn is more melodramatic and so Bergman’s acting style fits in better. It’s got all the Technicolor pleasures a soundstage can offer, and high-stakes moral arcs aplenty. But what made the film for me were the performances, and the way the camera captured them. Hitchcock here has this trick of holding the camera on a face for just long enough to unsettle you, to demand that you look closer and speculate on what might be happening under that rugged surface. Usually the face is Joseph Cotten’s, who’s phenomenal as a rough-hewn emancipated convict in 19th-century Sydney: possibly a walled garden of sinister secrets, possibly a stoppered fountain of self-sacrificing romance… possibly, violently, both.

Michael Wilding is also ridiculously good as the ne’er-do-well cousin of the new colonial governor. His role could have been heavy–this whole movie could have been heavy–but Wilding brings a weird comic streak, edgy and uncomfortable and impulsive, a real hint of Gene Wilder in both his looks and his manner, and so he leavens the whole movie.

Now for three 90-minute horror flicks, available streaming, which are okay for popcorn night but feel like pieces of a single excellent movie. All three were found, one way or another, via the Deadly Doll. All of these are good enough that I am interested in seeing more from their directors; none of them touch the emotional depths of a Pumpkinhead or the surprising artistic vision of a Hell Night.

Crush the Skull: A group of ill-assorted thieves break into a house which turns out to harbor a serial killer. The plot is perfunctory and I disliked the director’s habit of suddenly pushing the camera in on a character with a jerk, then cutting. It felt showy without adding any insight or deeper connection to the character. The script is often funny, but way too often it undercuts what should be a moment of genuine emotion with humor. Don’t be afraid to let your audience be sad! Give us a whole beat to feel sorry for somebody!

That said, the characters are fantastic. They’re the reason to watch. Ollie (Chris Dinh, who also co-wrote with director Viet Nguyen) loves the criminal life, but knows he’s up against California’s three-strikes law. The opening sequence lets him make a hard moral choice, and he screws up in a way that’s funny and poignant and, as the Deadly Doll notes, immediately gets us firmly on his side. So good. His girlfriend Blair (Katie Savoy) dreams of a life beyond the next score. They’re both funny and sweet–and competent, unlike the other two members of the crew, the loser brother Connor and the dim-bulb sidekick Riley (Chris Riedell and Tim Chiou). The film gets plenty of laughs out of the moments when Connor and Riley are dumber than a box of hair, but it doesn’t hold them in contempt. You’ll feel for them as much as you shake your head at them.

I loved spending time with all of these characters. I just wish they weren’t the only aspect of this movie which felt like it got enough attention.

The Deadly Doll’s review has some nice notes on the making-of, explaining why the characters are so strong.

Haunt: An xxxxxxtreme haunted house where the kills are real! Lay it on me!!

The good: I enjoyed this haunted house a lot! We saw enough of the scares (the lighting is clear even when the characters are in darkness) and the house felt like a thing that might exist. Haunt also spends quite a bit of time in that tilting mindset where the characters don’t know they’re in a horror movie, where they’re genuinely uncertain what’s real and how they should react, and it handles the increasingly-tense rhythm of fear and relief really well.

The meh: There are basically three story elements here and they never join forces. There’s the haunted house (awesome!). There’s the reason for the haunted house (either supernatural or like… a cult of extreme body-modification nerds??? very very dumb either way imho). And there’s the childhood memories of abuse experienced by the only character we get to know. Her background does play a role in the house’s setup at the climax, but until then the scares don’t seem at all related to anything in the characters’ psyches; there’s no creeping feeling of, Does this place somehow know me? It feels, tbh, like she’s given a painful history so we root for her, rather than because the writer/directors (Scott Beck & Bryan Woods) have thought through how her background affects her, how she relates to the metaphor of the house or the whole phenomenon of scared-for-fun, how her background might affect her relationship with the friends she’s known since high school, etc. It’s tacked on. And the fact that these elements never really add up, never multiply one another’s impact or relate to one another on a deep level, makes the whole movie feel kind of pointless.

Hell Fest: An xxxxxxtreme Halloween fair where the kills are real! Lay it on me, I guess!

The good: Gosh the colors are gorgeous. Just so much scarlet and so many shades of glowing blue. This is a great movie to look at. Score by Bear McCreary, very classy. Some nice fakeouts where you think a character is safe and then: surprise!

The meh: We don’t quite see as much of the fake scares here–there are too many of them for us to spend the time with each one that Haunt does. But mostly the problem is that literally every character, from the killer to the heroine, is a cardboard cutout, a playing piece to be moved around the board of the fair. None of these people have hopes or dreams or specific fears! Once you’ve made that decision, there’s no way that your creepy fair can relate in any way to their psyches, because they haven’t got any. It’s just a bunch of gooey stuff.

Art

Alfred Hitchcock

horror

Previous Post

April 19, 2021

A New Extra-Millennial Book About Friendship as a Site of Sacrifice

Next Post

May 12, 2021 Between Mushroom Cloud and Monastery: I read "Generation X"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Gospel" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Good News God's Truth Sacred Story Holy Word