A New Pop Musical About the Six Wives of Henry VIII

Last updated on: August 13, 2019 at 12:35 pm by Eve Tushnet

A New Pop Musical About the Six Wives of Henry VIII 2019-08-13T12:35:20-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I was in London recently for a family vacation. Lots of new discoveries, including Sue Symons, whose beautiful, emotional depictions of scenes from the Hebrew Bible were on display at Bath Abbey. She’s also done a New Testament series, and I’d really recommend them for your delight and meditation.

I also saw “Six,” a pop musical about the women mostly known to us as items in a list: “Divorced, beheaded, died; divorced, beheaded, survived.” This is a pop confection, tarted up with flashy costumes and more girl-power boosterism than hard thinking; I had low expectations and therefore a lot of fun. The show’s flaws are as revealing as its midriff-baring, spangle-strewn ensembles, so I figured I’d give you a short post about it. For those in the Boston area, it’s playing now in Cambridge; it will also come to Broadway at some point in the near future. I do NOT know the history here so apologies if anything below is wrongheaded from a sober intelligent person’s pov.

The show is framed as a competition in which each woman sings about her woes, and the audience will vote at the end on who had the hardest life. Like Eurovision, but for suffering. Of course since the show is v. v. feminist we won’t actually pit these ladies against each other, so really they just sing in sequence. Jane Seymour and Catherine Parr have ballads, which maybe you’ll like if you like pop ballads. To me the other, spikier songs were more interesting, and in fact more effective at evoking sympathy because they didn’t so blatantly make a grab for the heartstrings.

Skipping the first wife (or, I’m guessing, the only woman ever united with Henry in the sacrament of marriage??) for a moment, let’s go to Anne Boleyn: a sans-souci sketchfest, the living embodiment of her anthem’s chorus: “Sorry, not sorry!” This is such a weird place to take the character and I enjoyed it immensely. It brought out the adolescent aspects of the story, but I wanna and you can’t make me! She’s a cavalier homewrecker and climber, and it works because all the way through we all know what happens to her. She takes that pop persona where it’s cute that you never apologize and sets it in a world where driving top speed through your life will get you killed by your totalitarian husband. She’s whistling past the Tower, and I loved it, as I love all forms of whistling in the dark.

Anne of Cleves! Anne of Cleves gets two songs, possibly because she’s the only wife (again, I don’t know the history) who actually achieved worldly success aka “girl power.” First we get a hilarious Eurotrash song about Hans Holbein (really!), combining the two enduring German musical stereotypes of cabaret and “Sprockets.” This also offers the endearing contemporary touch of explaining that her problem was that “I didn’t look like my profile picture.” Then Anne sings about how she got out of her humiliating marriage to Henry not only alive, but with her very own castle. She glories in it, even her dancing is like a taunt, there’s a playful childlike quality (she chants the King of the Castle chant as her chorus) which is pure pleasure rather than the edgy bad-idea midnight girlhood of Anne Boleyn’s song.

Last among the three standout songs/characters is Katherine Howard, whose song begins with the same sordid hijinks of the Boleyn sequence: “Lock up your husbands, lock up your sons/Kate Howard’s in town and we’re gonna have fun!” (sorry, lyrics are all approximate as I didn’t take notes.) But then the unsettling details begin to emerge, like how her introduction to sex was when she was 13 (14?) with an authority figure, and slowly the grabby, romantic-trainwreck sexuality starts to look much more like a #metoo narrative in which serial heartbreak starts to look like the aftermath of abuse. This production’s Howard was styled very Sporty Spice, all ponytail and booty shorts, the perfect foil for the awful story she unfolds.

This show’s Catherine of Aragon really worked to give the character the sass and fire the book clearly wants her to display. Her song is good but not great–it’s the Annes and Kate Howard whose melodies are still stuck in my head a week later. C. of A. gets a good quick jab about the dissolution of the monasteries; this show portrays her as a devout Catholic, but also wants to portray her as in some way a Strong Female Role Model. The show wants her to be fierce. Those two things don’t really go together when her story simply cannot be jammed into the S.F.R.M. narrative of worldly success.

The biggest underlying problem with the show comes out precisely in her lyrics: “I’m Catherine of Aragon, my loyalty is to the Vatican/Try to get rid of me? You won’t try that again!” is charming, but completely untrue to a history where… he absolutely did try that again, and got away with it. Her chorus is all about how there’s “n-n-n-n-n-n-no way” he’ll get rid of her. But he does. She dies in exile in England.

This song could actually work, could be poignant and complex, if it were taken in a harder and sadder direction. What if Catherine holds on to the belief that no matter what happens in the world of men, she is married to Henry and that bond is one not even the King has the power to break? If only the song had let her admit that he got rid of her quite effectively in the world’s eyes, but that they were bound together ’til death in the eyes of God. That could give you a wrenching triumph when she predeceases Henry (this I had to look up) and is finally free. It could also give a spin on the show’s insistence that the women are more than just their common bond as Henry’s wives: Her bond to Henry did define her life, as she said, even in the face of Henry’s insistence that it didn’t.

The same problem comes up for all the wives at the end. The show wants them to have a happy ending, because girl power, but they manifestly and extremely didn’t. So instead we’re invited to imagine an alternate history where they all get together and… go on tour as a pop band.

Really??? Your dreamworld ending is that you get to be a different kind of celebrity? I know it’s meant to be an image of women’s friendship and exuberance, but it is, in fact, just the Spice Girls, an almost aggressively banal triumph set against their catastrophic defeats.

This would’ve been controversial for several reasons, but something less banal and equally woman-centered would be (for example) ending with them all in Heaven. Admit that many people’s earthly lives aren’t powerful triumphs of fierceness! And give a real promise that something better than simply being queen–or queen of the charts–awaits us. If you don’t want to do that, then go in an even more Hamilton direction and emphasize a historical reassessment, where the wives live again in the minds of contemporary people and their integrity (or whatever, lol) is recognized and honored. That’s less satisfying but also more honest than asking me to feel good about a thing that never happened and wouldn’t be anything more than mere worldly success if it had. If worldly success is the measure then Henry wins. Don’t play that game, girl!

Picture of Anne Boleyn with her head where it oughta be via Wikimedia Commons.

Art

England your England

moral memories of the past

she says "I am not a femini-i-ist"

sweet smell of success

Previous Post

July 31, 2019

The Night Ape Sex Came Home to Play

Next Post

August 17, 2019 "I Want Everyone to Get High!"... And Other Contemporary Christian Anthems

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was sent by the Jerusalem church to witness revival in Samaria?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul and Barnabas Peter and John James and John Silas and Timothy