The Night Ape Sex Came Home to Play

Last updated on: July 31, 2019 at 5:00 pm by Eve Tushnet

The Night Ape Sex Came Home to Play 2019-07-31T17:00:08-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the summer before I went to college, a comic collection came out: Chester Square by Jaime Hernandez, the thirteenth volume in the greatest comics series of all time. Love and Rockets was started in 1981 by three brothers: Jaime, Gilbert, and the elusive Mario. Gilbert mostly made comics about the fictional Latin American village of Palomar, where the slugs are tasty, the children are spooky, and the men are confused ’cause the women make you growl. The art is homey and sometimes bulbous or grotesque, and the stories, heavily influenced by Garcia Marquez, include witches and ghosts and mysterious disappearances at the eclipse of the sun.

Jaime’s tales mostly centered on the LA suburban punk community. They started out as a kooky mix of low-rent superheroics and punk slice-of-life. These comics star two careening chick catastrophes: Margarita Chascarillo (“Maggie the Mechanic,” a goofy ball of anxieties, worried about her weight, chasing after men, a homebody who ends up traveling the globe and works as everything from a science-fiction robot mechanic to a fake accountant for a lady wrestler) and Esperanza Glass (“Hopey.” Whenever there’s trouble, she’s there on the double… because she started it). And Jaime’s comics also star Maggie’s hometown of Huerta, better loved as “Hoppers”: a Mexican-American neighborhood where families fight and gangsters love. Jaime’s style is hot, these crisp and glaring blacks and whites, sun-shocked and razor-edged. It’s romantic and iconic.

Maggie and Hopey are best friends. The other punks call them, not entirely fondly, “the Incest Twins.” (It’s not hard to tell them apart: Maggie is the short one, and Hopey is the shorter one.) At some point they become lovers. I was introduced to Love and Rockets by a friend from Riot Grrrl, and while I love a lot of the Palomar stories (especially the harrowing serial-killer tale, “Blood of Palomar”), the heart of L&R for me was the epic love of these queer punk teens.

I re-read Love & Rockets a couple years ago, and one thing I noticed is how much of the Maggie and Hopey epic is about not having anywhere to live. Half of their million crazy adventures, from the sexy sojourn in the thousand rooms of (literally, but also figuratively) horny gazillionaire H.R. Costigan’s mansion to the terrifying descent into a baby-doll sex cult in Wigwam Bam, happen because they don’t have anywhere to sleep at night. Del Chimney’s house o’ gropin’, the car Hopey sleeps in after she sets fire to her relationship with her band… these are places nobody can call home. And yet the fallback arms of Hoppers are always waiting to catch them–a reassurance, and a threat. Home is always lurking at the end of the long escape tunnel.

After Chester Square came out, I got caught up in the college life and its attendant changes (including my conversion to Catholicism). I was reading more Chesterton than comics. Love and Responsibility, not Love and Rockets. I didn’t reject these books, I still loved them, but they were preserved in my memory stopping right where Chester Square stops. And that was a place I loved. Chester Square marks (imo) the high point of Jaime H.’s style. It’s white-hot, noir-influenced, aching with isolation… and it ends with Maggie and Hopey reunited, the way they gotta be.

At some point I realized there had been other L&R books while I wasn’t looking. I went and read them. They were okay or whatever. With Jaime’s books especially, I often found myself appreciating or respecting them, without loving them. Even the titles of the collections give you the feeling of characters moving on to a new stage in life, with all the regrets that come with change: Ghosts of Hoppers, The Education of Hopey Glass, The Love Bunglers. Maggie and Hopey broke up again. They got normal jobs: Maggie managed an apartment complex (with a superhero tenant, which felt more like a nod to the comics’ past than like a source of new stories) and Hopey became a teacher. Maggie got back together with Ray D., an artsy ex; Hopey married a woman and had a kid. Life knocked them around–really hard and really physically, in Maggie and Ray’s case. Maggie and Hopey finally attained a certain adulthood; and it couldn’t feel real to me, because they seemed to have lost one another. I didn’t like it, I didn’t want it, I did the classic thing where in your head the comics stop in 1996. Continuity is a matter of personal choice!

This year a friend sent me a link to an LA Times story about an upcoming Love and Rockets book. Hopey and Maggie would go to a Hoppers punk reunion… and come to some kind of reckoning. Somehow they’d reconcile what they shared back in the day with the reality they go home to now. That book, Is This How You See Me?, sold out so fast that I ordered it in June and only got my copy this weekend. I’ve just finished it.

There’s a million things to say, and I’m trying to pick what is most important to say for people who don’t (yet) love the greatest love story in comics history. Is This weaves together the past (1979 and 1980, the good old bad old days) with the present (smart phones, menopause, regrets). It’s an education in how to tell a certain kind of love story. Maggie and Hopey shaped one another’s lives. Their love is a fact about them now. It can’t compete with the love they share with their partners–but it doesn’t need to. We get to see good ol’ Maggie, needy and vacillating; and good ol’ Hopey, reflexively sarcastic and then suddenly so tender. We also get to see how they’ve changed, Hopey especially, how she’s lost some of her cockiness and has a harder time feeling at home in this reunion with her misspent youth. We get to see, once again, how they’re always getting into situations where they’re a lot more vulnerable than they realize.

We get to see how they pull one another back into old dysfunctional patterns. We get to see how there will always be a place in Maggie’s heart where nobody but Hopey can live, and vice versa.

There are things about every marriage (at least, every good-enough marriage?) that only the married people know. The marriage creates a private language, a realm apart, which even the children of the marriage, even the spouses’ closest friends, can never enter. What struck me about Is This How You See Me? is that it portrays that exclusive union (which each partner sees in their own way–a shared secret life doesn’t mean a shared perspective on that secret life) in Maggie’s relationship with Ray D., and in Hopey’s relationship with Sadaf… and in Maggie and Hopey’s relationship with one another. Irreplaceable, impenetrable, inescapable: There will always be things only you can understand in me.

That’s a story you can only tell if the intimacy between Our Heroines and their new partners is also real, life-shaping, everpresent, and exclusive. This is a story about a love even deeper than the love at the end of Chester Square: a love which accepts that it will never be the only love… and that it will never go away, even when you want it to, it will never simply be replaced, it will always be as close to you as home.

Love & Rockets mural feat. Maggie Chascarillo via Wikimedia Commons.

Art

friendship

gayer than a picnic basket

home is anywhere you hang your head

Los Bros Hernandez

memories are films about ghosts

Previous Post

July 31, 2019

If My Heart Was a House You'd Be Home By Now: Two short movie reviews

Next Post

August 13, 2019 A New Pop Musical About the Six Wives of Henry VIII

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the correct chronological order of Paul's travels mentioned in his letters to the Corinthians?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Asia, Jerusalem, Corinth, Macedonia Corinth, Jerusalem, Macedonia, Asia Jerusalem, Macedonia, Corinth, Asia Macedonia, Corinth, Jerusalem, Asia