War of the “We Are the World”s: I read SPACE OPERA

Last updated on: November 12, 2018 at 2:17 pm by Eve Tushnet

War of the “We Are the World”s: I read SPACE OPERA 2018-11-12T14:17:14-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

You will know if you want to read Catherynne Valente’s new novel, Space Opera, as soon as I tell you what it’s about: Aliens force the remaining members of a washed-up glam band to perform in an intergalactic Eurovision Song Contest, with the fate of the entire Earth on the line. There are two kinds of people in this world; I’m the kind who heard “intergalactic Eurovision Song Contest” and thought YES PUT IT IN MY FACE.

Space Opera gave me most of what I wanted from its premise. I’ll forgive this book a lot–even though there’s a lot to forgive. An overly schematic summary might say, “The themes here are tough, poignant, and unexpected; the worldview is self-absorbed and intensely obnoxious; the prose style, which is basically Douglas Adams + Weetzie Bat, is perfectly matched to both the novel’s strengths and its flaws.” I was irritated with this book all the way through to the end–the very last three paragraphs are the exact kind of blah, shallow philosophasting that makes so much SF seem so intent on proving its lack of wisdom. (It’s especially painful since the bit right before that is a perfect ending! Where is this woman’s editor?!) And yet I also loved it and was charmed by it, and will probably re-read. I guess it isn’t Eurovision if you never want to throw something through the screen.

Let’s start with the prose. It takes some getting used to. Every single page has something like this: “Otozh is the most absurdly, flamboyantly, unrealistically mineral-rich planet a geologist could write down in her dream journal. Its seas are liquid gold and platinum, its mountains so stuffed with gemstones that volcanic eruptions are expected by tourists like pinatas at a billionaire’s birthday party, and any random bucket of dirt would keep a human tech manufacturer in rare earths for a decade. Over the millennia, everyone and their overbearing mother has tried to invade and loot the Utorak’s ridiculous dragon’s hoard of a world, so, unsurprisingly, they are a rather defensive, anxious, socially awkward people who have elevated military strategy well beyond art, philosophy, or science and well into an autonomic bodily process. An Utorak is physiologically incapable of sitting down to breakfast without making sure he has his bacon at a decisive disadvantage and his children arranged around him in a classic tortoise formation.”

It’s too much, there’s always one curlicue too many, and there’s something sweaty in all this talk of “a glamgrind anthem perfectly crystallizing the despair of the young enslaved by the London real estate market crossbred with the desperate futuro-cosmic hope of murdering a Martian catwalk in a satin slip while guzzling a rubbish bin full of cheap ruby port, as sung by the comet-pummeled ghost of Oscar Wilde snorting stars like meth.” On the other hand, I laughed out loud a lot, as in this encounter with a light-based species that does maintenance work: “Oh, I had a fantastic time talking to the depressive socialist moonbeam. After fifteen minutes, I actually asked it to kill me, but I was informed that would be nonunion work.”

And a lot of the best jokes get their impact from the novel’s weirder, harder themes. For a novel covered in “glitter and ganache,” this book turns out to be surprisingly interested in regret, the ridiculousness of contempt, and a gallant resignation in the face of terrific cosmic unfairness. “Regret is the waste product of the multiverse” is a brilliant concept and it pays off in a truly satisfying manner at the climax. I do think this novel indulges in too many lecturing speeches about how barbaric humankind is, look what humans did to the lions and the dodos and the Cree and the Lakota (…wait, what?), but maybe you have to feel a lot of contempt yourself in order to expose its nature so harshly. There are great moments about how aliens don’t hold in contempt the things we think they should; and moments in which they utterly fail to understand what we hold in contempt, like the hilarious bit with the computer species who can’t understand why we hate them when they’re only trying to help. The loathing any red-blooded human feels for helpers is both evoked and explored here, and I enjoyed watching Valente play on my own emotions, my own instinctive rage at how dare they! and my rueful, humiliated acknowledgment that these horrible condescending alien Lady Bountifuls were doing us a solid. There are some lovely bits here playing on the difference between false and real humility, and the degree to which the latter is fueled by self-loathing, an attitude toward which Valente is surprisingly sympathetic.

Let me go briefly back to the Cree and the Lakota, though, because there are some very creepy moments where we see the hard limits of Valente’s internal universe. Sure, every time she tries to write *~~*life advice*~~* it’s boring and awful, posing as edgy while actually utterly conformed to the moral consensus of the NPR tote-bag class. (If you think you know a lot about human sexual desire, but don’t think you have to know anything about human religious longing, let me suggest that the latter undercuts the credibility of the former.) Sure, when one of our heroes takes a swipe at Kanye and then later at Morrissey I start to suspect that Valente’s own aesthetics conform exactly to her politics, what if glam was correct, I can only shudder.

But what bothered me more, and what I found harder to work around, were the moments when it seemed like Valente hadn’t noticed how sharply she’d limited the presentation of the human experience: the bit about how waitresses make people feel, for example, which only makes sense if you don’t think about waiting tables from a server’s point of view. (While a customer, Valente’s imagined “you,” is having a human experience of a waitress, the waitress is also having a human experience, you know?) There’s this weird rhapsody about children’s television hosts as universal icons of comfort, which then pulls back like, Oh right, not every culture in the world has children’s television, so there’s a perfunctory coda about how if you don’t have Mr. Rogers I guess you have like parents or whatever. There are just these off-key moments where “human experience” seems defined by a very narrow band of human experience–which I get is probably inevitable, but do we have to do this list of species destroyed by human beings which includes Native peoples who are both very much alive, and… actually also human?

The human race’s champions are both mixed-race (and with pleasingly divergent personalities and aspirations), which works really well with the theme of complex intercultural encounters, often under unjust circumstances, producing beauty and wild life. But there’s also this recurring undercurrent of cutesyness with the immigrant parents and grandparents. I’m hesitant to make oversharp claims here; I will just quote this one bit, say that this character always talks like this and the other immigrant parent talks in a much toned-down but similar style, and let you judge: “Do not make yourself a fret. I am your laundry machine like always, am I not? Now, you just button your eyes on Nani, Mr. Hot of the Shot. Your big Danesh-head always thinks it is more full of things than the rest of the heads around here, but with it, you cannot even make roti that fails to taste like a foot. Watch tight and presto chango, Nani will do Mr. BunnyBugs best good lipstick trick.” There’s a thing here about how culture clash, and cultural intermingling, creates results we read as cutesy or poignant or delightful for reasons which have more to do with our own preconceptions than with the people we’re encountering–and yet this also seems kind of minstrelish. Maybe that’s my own intercultural limitation, I don’t know.

[* ETA: There’s a hint here of stuff like the Sorryno, in Rushdie’s Moor’s Last Sigh. But I think Nani struck me differently in part because the content of the Sorryno sign is unexpected and rich in character, whereas Nani is kind of a stern-but-loving grandma stereotype.]

So there’s all this. And yet–“We don’t suppose you’re related to the Aldebaran sapiens sapiens? No? Pity. They’re marvelous company, you know. Their feet come right off.” There are the descriptions of the music (“whole-body jazz infection,” which is meant literally!), the aliens (like the zombies who “don’t see species,” everybody’s equal in their eyes because everybody can be killed and worn as a suit), the stand-up modesty circuit and the Mephistophelian temptation of the housecat and the strange, ironic, beautiful use of “It Came Upon a Midnight Clear”… I cheered for our champions, I was on Team Human in spite of everything; and in spite of everything, I am on Team This Book, too.

Art

Catherynne Valente

Eurovision Song Contest

humiliation

science fiction double feature

Previous Post

November 11, 2018

I Know My Way Is Hard and Steep: The music of the Radiant Obscurity Collective

Next Post

November 14, 2018 Plots Fall, Everyone Dies: Revisiting "Harry Potter" for No Real Reason

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who prophesied about the birth of Jesus in the Old Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Daniel Isaiah Ezekiel Jeremiah