Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Eve Tushnet

William Shakespeare, SJ: “Equivocation”

Last updated on: November 7, 2017 at 3:47 pm   by Eve Tushnet

William Shakespeare, SJ: “Equivocation” 2017-11-07T15:47:32-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So I commemorated the Fifth of November by attending a reading of Equivocation, Jesuit priest Bill Cain’s tragicall comedy about an alternate history in which James I commissioned Shakespeare (here “Shag,” whatever, we all know who this is) to write a play about the Gunpowder Plot. It’s not a perfect play; it does get preachy, and you can see contemporary Catholic obsessions and tics peeking out from amid the Jacobean trappings. E.g. the idea that destruction of community bonds are the destruction of “faith itself.” This is very Alan Bray and it’s very 2017 well-meaning US Catholics but it is not all that much like the words of Jesus, who came not to bring peace but a sword. We also get some of the contemporary obsession with Who Tells Your Story.

But if you love Shakespeare or have any interest in Reformation England’s repression of the Catholic faith, Equivocation offers plenty of toothsome lines and images. You could call it Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Damned. There’s literary criticism: “One thing follows another. That’s how people talk!” an exasperated player protests, even as the scene playing out around him suggests that people rarely have such coherent reasons for what they say and do.* There’s a lovely, strange description of how actors serve the audience, which culminates with: “Our bodies become their souls made visible.” There are jabs at Bardolatry, and even the occasional perfect Wildean line like, “I must say, I’m growing tired of the moral superiority of the criminal classes.” There’s a crown handled as if it were a suicide’s gun.

*I just realized this bit is a defense of the theory of equivocation itself! Lol this play outsmarts me on many levels.

There’s fun “woman is the irony of the community” stuff, as Judith Shakespeare gives the play’s only soliloquies, even though she hates soliloquies. The scenes about Shakespeare’s family life use his love of twin mixups and cross-dressing to express tragedy rather than creating comedy. There are unexpected, poignant moments, like Shakespeare’s penance–which is also one of the play’s many examples of double-meaning phrases. It’s a twisty play; it has its historical crackpot theories, the validity of which I am not fit to judge as this is not one of the Reformation things I know anything really about. Equivocation hits hard on the idea that the Gunpowder Plot is the real “end of the beginning” for modern, Protestant (/post-Protestant) England: the birth of a new country, after a long labor under Henry and Elizabeth. Equivocation often makes you feel the fear, the actual repression experienced in a country full of paid informers. It makes you feel the losses: One character laments, in re: Purgatory, “They closed it, the bastards.”

If you’ve spent too much time chasing the Swan of Avon you will truly thrill when you realize that this play has its own version of “The Mousetrap,” and when you figure out what they’re doing with the Porter. Judith’s speech about her father’s last four plays is simply lovely. There’s just so much good stuff here.

“I’m trying to write a play which isn’t about revenge,” Shakespeare says at one point. “It’s never been done!” Part of Equivocation‘s poignancy is that it is a play-as-revenge, a pretty blatant attempt to settle scores and right wrongs, to raise up the humiliated dead and cast down the mighty. (The roll call of Robert Cecil’s descendants is good miserable fun.) And yet it also expresses so well the longing for union, reconciliation, forgiveness, impossible miracles of restoration.

I enjoyed this immensely–I couldn’t keep a smile off my face–and I’ll definitely seek it out if I can see it performed. Very grateful to the Sheen Center for hosting this Bonfire Night entertainment. A toast to the players; and to our absent friends. May we all be one.

Art

Mackerel-Snapping

abuse of power comes as no surprise

England your England

I don't believe in modern love

mackerel-snapping

what you will

woman is the irony of the community

Previous Post



November 2, 2017

"Fearful Grasping": I review "Native Gardens"

Next Post



November 12, 2017 You Cannot Serve Both Audrey and Audrey II


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus do for His disciples at the Last Supper?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Washed their feet Sent them away Fed them fish Gave them money

Related posts from Eve Tushnet

Catholic

Goodfellas of the Flower Moon

Eve Tushnet

Catholic

When the Lights Go Out (Everybody Starts to...

Eve Tushnet

Catholic

Punch Drunk Love: I watch "Bottoms"

Eve Tushnet

Catholic

They Flew: I review Carlos Eire's new book...

Eve Tushnet

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube