Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Eve Tushnet

Two Short Gay Catholic Whatnot Notes: An Apology (Mine) And Possible Specifics (Yours)

Last updated on: March 6, 2017 at 1:07 pm   by Eve Tushnet

Two Short Gay Catholic Whatnot Notes: An Apology (Mine) And Possible Specifics (Yours) 2017-03-06T13:07:36-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

LOL what a terrible title.

Okay, so I did a couple speaking engagements last week, including one at the Catholic University of America (go whatever their mascot is! Doves?). At CUA I got a couple questions which I didn’t think I answered well, and which are general enough that I think it makes sense to say something about them on the blog.

One guy connected my general support for Pope Francis’s call for the Church to apologize to gay people with something I said in this Atlantic piece: “I even loved [the Church’s] tabloid, gutter-punching side, the way Catholics tend to mix ourselves up in politics and art and pop culture. (I love that side a little less now, but it’s necessary.)” So he basically asked, Is there anything in the Church’s political participation around gay rights that you think should be repented and apologized for?

I don’t know that it’s my place to tell other people what to repent, but I can say what I do regret and am sorry for in my own political participation, which is that I was really, really naive about the context in which Christian opposition to gay marriage took place. If you’re growing up in the church, it’s not just that your pastor might rant about gay people destroying the fabric of society. It’s that even if the people around you say, “We oppose gay marriage,” or, “We defend marriage as the union of a man and a woman,” that is almost certainly the only thing they will say about your life.

I didn’t think (enough) about what it would be like to have such an intense, inflamed political question constantly discussed in churches which offered no vision of their gay children’s future. I think it would be only natural to ask oneself, sitting in that pew, “You guys will defend marriage, okay, fine–but what in my life, what in my love, are you willing to make sacrifices to defend?” And that question will only arise if you’re an unusually self-confident person; the more common question, I think, was just, “Why am I so messed up that I can’t get with the program here? Is it that God really despises me and has no future for me unless I fix myself somehow?”

Over time I began to see how the absence of visions of gay people’s vocations and future had made my own life harder and been really devastating to a lot of people’s lives and faith. But I didn’t really connect the dots on what advocacy for marriage as the union of man and woman meant in the “Lava” world, in the world where marriage is the only publicly-honored way to make another adult your kin, in the churches which no longer recognize any Christian forms of same-sex love and which refuse to ask what gay people can teach them, what gifts we can offer.

So, in terms of amends I am not sure what there is to do other than what I spend a lot of time doing now, trying to recover holy forms of love for gay people and encouraging our churches to listen to our voices. But if people have other suggestions I will consider them.

The second question came up more than once at CUA and is a question I get a lot, basically a young person saying, “I’m not gay but I really want to help! What can I do to love and welcome my lgbt brothers and sisters?”

And my unhelpful answer is always that there’s no one answer, you have to listen to the people around you, etc etc. Which is true enough: I don’t know that it’s helpful to think in these categories, “How can I love [people in category X]?” But as I continue to re-read my motivational interviewing textbook I notice that when someone has a vague ideal of positive change, they suggest you ask them for specifics. An abstract description of change suggests some motivation for change, and is therefore encouraging, but it is less likely to lead to action if there’s no specific content, no “next right thing.”

In the book I offer some specifics, or pathways to figuring out which specific actions you should take. So like, if you speak positively about gay people, you may get a reputation as someone it’s safe to come out to. Or if you consider friendship a form of life-shaping love, when you do the whole early-adulthood thing of living with your friends you may want to be open about the fact that you see sharing a home with a friend as a possible life path, not a stage to pass through. (It’s a life path which, although this is really complicated!!, can coexist with marriage.) You can go back to your former high school or college and talk to students or guidance counselors or chaplains to try to get a sense of whether the school is a safe and nurturing place for lgbt students–and a place where they can imagine a future within the church. You can also seek out places where people are suffering because of their sexual orientation and make sacrifices for them: volunteering with homeless youth is one way to meet lgbt people, she said dryly. You can even, if you are not the kind of person who overthinks things or tries to deploy your compassion as a way of achieving other goals, contact local lgbt youth or religious groups and just ask them what they think you can do to serve. Be upfront about your beliefs, don’t do or support stuff that goes against your conscience, but ask if there’s something they would suggest for you.

So those are some starting places. For the actual lgbt/same-sex attracted people reading this, I will note that I get this question a lot and what it means is that there are a maybe-surprising number of people out there in the pews who want to support you but don’t really know how. Consider giving them some hints! I don’t know, I never want to tell people to come out or to be more open about being gay at church because there really can be severe consequences, but sometimes there are more open doors than you realize.

Gay Catholic Whatnot

Mackerel-Snapping

self-obsessed

chuuuuuuuurch

Gay Catholic Whatnot

mackerel-snapping

way the hell off-duty

Previous Post



March 6, 2017

Catholic Churches in the Philippines Sheltering Targets of Duterte's "Reign of Terror": The Guardian

Next Post



March 6, 2017 "To Fast Again": Eamon Duffy


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Paul taught the Galatians that circumcision is necessary for salvation.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Eve Tushnet

Catholic

Punch Drunk Love: I watch "Bottoms"

Eve Tushnet

Catholic

They Flew: I review Carlos Eire's new book...

Eve Tushnet

Catholic

"Why I'm Creating Orthodox Educational Resources by and...

Eve Tushnet

Catholic

Appassionato

Eve Tushnet

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube