Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Eve Tushnet

It Always Rains on Ben Affleck: Short Movie Reviews

Last updated on: September 6, 2015 at 9:31 pm   by Eve Tushnet

It Always Rains on Ben Affleck: Short Movie Reviews 2015-09-06T21:31:36-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Leopard: Burt Lancaster is the patriarch of an aristocratic Sicilian family whose role in society is inevitably being usurped by the rising middle class during the period of Italian unification. Directed in sun-soaked autumnal shade and color by Caravaggio–I mean, Visconti.

Lancaster is so good at these autumnal roles (The Swimmer) and everything here is gorgeous to look at. My favorite social or psychological note was the complex role played by the Church/the family priest. The patriarch is well aware that they are not really playing for the same team: At the end of the day the Church looks to the world to come, not the present social order; and the end of the day is drawing near. There’s a very fun conversation about how the patriarch needs to go to Confession, in which I think the priest is sincere on some level, though also attempting a characteristically clumsy manipulation on a more obvious level.

I wasn’t really hooked, which is a problem when a movie is three hours long and mostly full of wistful languor, wry resignation, discussions of battles that took place off-screen, and dresses. But that is a statement about me and if you can plunge yourself into this I think you’ll love it.

The family’s Catholicism starts out plangent (and I wish the version we saw translated the Latin, since I think it matters that they’re praying the Sorrowful Mysteries at the start–although I guess if you know what a sorrowful mystery is you probably already know enough Latin to figure out that that’s what that is) and even histrionic, but ends on a hushed and intimate note. I saw it with a stereotypically “presentist” audience but even they were quiet and, I think, moved by the final act of reverence.

The rest of these films are available on Netflix streaming in the US, in case that’s relevant information to you.

Honeymoon: A short, sharp horror flick (which I found via this review from the Deadly Doll) about a newlywed couple who go to the wife’s childhood summer cabin for their honeymoon. And then the wife starts to change.

What a truly great premise, really. It’s everything there is to fear about the marriage promise. You are yoking yourself not only to the happy present of this person, but to her unknown future self. Not just to the happy memories she’s shared with you, but to the past shames and sorrows she herself may not even remember. What if she changes? What if you’re not prepared? What if you can’t bear what you’ve promised to bear?

Throw in some anxiety around childbearing, and one of the most intense body-horror scenes I have witnessed in a very long time (I can usually watch any horror flick without physical flinching, but I flat-out recoiled and covered my face for this film’s one gory scene), and you’ve got a seriously scary and emotional film.

Here’s something that isn’t about this movie per se, but about the cultural world in which it draws its ragged breaths: I have to say that if you make an “is-she-crazy” horror flick with intense body horror concerning a woman’s reproductive system, I’m gonna side-eye you pretty hard. It’s not that nobody should make is-she-crazy or womb/vagina-horror movies. They touch on powerful fears, of women as well as men. It’s just… why do we go there so often? And I’m biased, sisters before misters and all that, but I think of something like Promises I Can Keep, where many of the women avoided marriage precisely because they’d seen so many men change dramatically for the worse after rings are on fingers. They had seen so many gentlemen in courtship become tyrants in wedlock. It’s not usually women, is it?, who think the marriage license is a deed of title. So there’s something in this film’s storyline that seems like it obscures a hard truth.

That said–this is a really solid, frightening and wrenching film. And it’s perfect for date night!

Kicking and Screaming: Endearing light comedy about that liminal year right after graduating from college. The always-charming Chris Eigeman plays Max, the ringleader of a pack of (let’s be real) losers. Noah Baumbach captures a lot of real-life dynamics perfectly here: Several of these guys are transparent in their desire to be taught how to live, how to act, but they don’t yet have the wisdom to choose good models or mentors. The corny rituals, like the buzz-in trivia game they play together, and the way they’re starting to notice the corniness and loudly reject it in the hopes that rejecting it will better their social position within the pack. That in-between stage where you’re quitting smoking–you already have things you’re quitting–but you still wear a retainer.

I also enjoyed the little wigginesses around the edges: the neon signs advertising RODENT SUPPLIES and SNAKE RENTAL among various normal items; the overheard snatches of conversation, “Let me tell you the worst thing about losing a foot!”

Wet Hot American Summer: It’s the last day of Jewish summer camp, 1981. (Already I am sort of in love with this movie.) A bunch of confusingly-aged campers and counselors endure a series of misadventures in which heterosexuality yanks them around like sticky, slobbery puppets. There’s a delightfully low opinion of human nature on display here. Everyone is very, very, very stupid in pursuit of the opposite sex.

The gay subplot is okay but feels dated, and not because it takes place in 1981. The horrifying refrigerator thing, by contrast, is still quite pungent satire.

Honestly I did feel that this movie was too long–it’s mostly one kind of humor, the exaggeration of human narcissism and stupidity–and the Jewishness wasn’t specific enough. We actually get a lot of it but… somehow it always feels surface-level. Costuming, not soul, you know? IDK, as a veteran of Camp Shalom and the JCC summer camp I wanted more than the terrific joke about all the Debbies. But if you read the first line of this capsule review and were already giggling I can definitely recommend it.

Changing Lanes: Holy cow, this was not what I expected.

It’s a thriller in which Samuel L. Jackson plays Doyle Gipson, a recovering alcoholic who gets in a collision with Wall Street lawyer Gavin Banek (Ben Affleck) as they’re both on their way to court. The consequences of the collision devastate Gipson’s family life, threaten his sobriety, and push him toward violence; meanwhile the same spiral of consequences exposes the lies and complicity underlying Banek’s wealth, career, and marriage. Wedding rings gleam on every finger as the plot skids and twists. And this is one of those rare films set not at Christmas, but on Good Friday.

This was so, so, so good. Emotionally raw (the scene where Banek talks with a priest does not go at all where a lesser movie might have taken it) and unpredictable, yet every unpredictable action seems, in retrospect, like the logical result of the two men’s situations and characters. There’s even, I swear to you, a scene with a set-piece speech in which the girl on a beach symbolizes–basically!–Lady Poverty.

It’s not perfect. Toward the very end I started to think, I’m not sure this is gonna stick the landing, and I don’t really think it did. While you can consider the movie’s ending quite dark, I don’t think the movie itself knows how dark it is. This movie is still allured by power, I think.

But so much of it is so good. A moral drama in which structural and personal sin both play starring roles; and conscience can only overcome so much.

“They have to write their own letters.”

Art

Mackerel-Snapping

Too much is never enough

a beach and a pretty girl

a shandeh for the goyim

Caravaggio

cupid and psycho

Good Friday

horror

if whiskey were a woman I'd be married for sure

in the flesh

marriage

Noah Baumbach

radix malorum est cupiditas

reading and repentance

sweet smell of success

Visconti is me

Viva L'Italia

woman is the irony of the community

Previous Post



September 6, 2015

"Selling Plasma to Survive: How Over a Million American Families Live on $2 a Day": New Book from Kathryn Edin

Next Post



September 7, 2015 The Long, Hot Summer: Jesse Walker on Rising Crime in US Cities


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did God create on the first day according to Genesis?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Animals Man Plants Light

Related posts from Eve Tushnet

Catholic

Goodfellas of the Flower Moon

Eve Tushnet

Catholic

When the Lights Go Out (Everybody Starts to...

Eve Tushnet

Catholic

Punch Drunk Love: I watch "Bottoms"

Eve Tushnet

Catholic

They Flew: I review Carlos Eire's new book...

Eve Tushnet

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube