Men, Women, Children and Humans: Some short movie reviews

Last updated on: July 14, 2015 at 12:46 pm by Eve Tushnet

Men, Women, Children and Humans: Some short movie reviews 2015-07-14T12:46:47-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What I’ve been watching.

Mr Skeffington: Two and a half hours of epic Bette Davis. We start in the 1910s, with Davis as a Scarlett-like belle of the ball who ends up turning down all her suitors to marry the Jewish financier Job Skeffington. She married him only in order to save her beloved wastrel brother from ruin, so although Mr. Skeffington demonstrates his patience and loyalty to her and she does try to please him and work up some fondness for him, things rapidly go downhill for the couple. We follow them through their tempestuous 1920s and then their estranged and heartbreaking 1930s. Will Mrs. Skeffington allow herself to be vulnerable and human, and embrace the man who truly loves her? Or will she let her desire for control destroy her only chance at happiness?

That’s a charitable way of putting the movie’s central problem. Mr Skeffington is so frustrating because it comes so close to greatness. The pacing is fantastic–you just roll right along, unable to look away from the screen. It’s startling how thoroughly Mr Skeffington plays the stereotypical wife’s role: He has the patience not only of his namesake, but of Griselda. He is endlessly gentle, he adores his daughter and strives to sacrifice his own happiness for the women in his life, and although he does end up reciprocating his wife’s infidelities, he makes it pretty clear that he would come home if she would let him. And although Mrs S eventually becomes looks- and youth-obsessed in a gross stereotypical way, you can definitely read that as a culturally-channeled fear that she will lose her power. (Her relationship with her daughter will ring familiar to many women, unfortunately.)

The problem is that in the second half the movie becomes, “Let’s all lecture Bette Davis.” Has the introduction of a psychiatrist, to a film not essentially about psychiatry, ever improved a 1940s or ’50s film? Here comes the doctor, the scientific man, to condescend to Mrs S and tell the audience what to think.

“Embrace your vulnerability and powerlessness” is a true piece of wisdom, something we all have to do. Similarly “You won’t find happiness until you learn to give yourself away.” But one of the most obnoxious things about this movie’s style of condescending sexism is the way it curdles those true things and makes them false, makes them excuses to punish women for selfishness.

Anyway Bette Davis is fabulous. I love how she uses her artificiality. She’s a hothouse flower in the first segment, and then a plastic flower. The ending is horrifyingly sentimental but, you know, I’m glad the Holocaust taught Bette Davis how to love.

Ils (Them): French horror flick with some excellent shots, a creepy soundtrack, and a very cool setting (French expats menaced in the home they’re renting in Romania). Did not scare me or make me think. Eden Lake without the class hatred? Just didn’t work for me, I guess.

Phone: Korean horror about a haunted cell phone. This is pretty great! A twisty plot, sympathetic characters, real sadness and scares, themes of adults betraying children and the jealousy caused by infertility. Also I’m sexually attracted to the color control in this movie. These oranges and blues, just drenching color, so hot. My only criticism is that it seemed like the pacing of the scares was slightly off. There were lots of moments when I think I would have jumped out of my skin if something had happened just a split second earlier or later.

The Host: More Korean horror. This was just an excellent film. From writer & director Joon-Ho Bong (Mother, Snowpiercer, Memories of Murder). A troubled family is caught up in social chaos following the emergence of a mutant seamonster. Gorgeous shots, real edge-of-the-seat scares and tension, incredibly sympathetic and unusual characters. Our heroes are a schoolgirl, a grandfather, a “slow” and hapless father, a lady archer, and an obstreperous drunk ex-protester. The monster is shown early and in detail, which I did not expect, but it remains scary and awful throughout the film. The plot twists enough to be surprising and wrenching, but not so much that it feels forced.

Lots of strong thematic material: the way we blame suffering people in order to feel like we have some control over a terrible situation; the way the middle generation needs to come together to protect the older and younger ones; the utterly human unwillingness to follow rules and commands, which has many good effects throughout the film, in part because so many of the film’s authorities are untrustworthy. The authority figures in this film are basically my “doctors and policemen” tag come to life.

Art

Bette Davis

doctors and policemen

horror

I could pick a better century out of a hat

Joon-Ho Bong

science fiction double feature

woman is the irony of the community

Previous Post

July 14, 2015

"Thirteen Songs About Forgiveness": Mockingbird

Next Post

July 14, 2015 Photographs from Miracle Village, A Florida Town for Sex Offenders

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How tall was Goliath according to the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

About 10 feet 5 inches About 9 feet 9 inches About 6 feet 5 inches About 8 feet