Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Eve Tushnet

Home
Catholic
Religious Music & Entertainment
It’s Called AltFem, Not CtrlFem: An Eccentric Report

It’s Called AltFem, Not CtrlFem: An Eccentric Report

Last updated on: September 25, 2014 at 4:19 pm by Eve Tushnet

It’s Called AltFem, Not CtrlFem: An Eccentric Report 2014-09-25T16:19:47-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday I went to the launch of AltFem, a new magazine from the people who brought you AltMuslimah and AltCatholicah, which explores the intersection of feminism and what I suppose we must call “traditional” faith. It was a religiously diverse event–lots of headscarves; several babies! I spoke on the first panel, about forging a more inclusive feminism. I’m going to do at least one more post inspired by the event, which will be on an underexplored aspect of Mary’s role as model of motherhood, but for right now I’ll just give you some very very scattered notes.

* You can see other people’s reactions at the various hashtags #altfem and #faithfem. Diversity!

* Before the event I’d suggested that I might talk about the issues I discuss here, here, and here, about rescuing submission and obedience as sometimes-positive categories. Right now I think if you say those words people’s immediate and often only reaction is to see the potential negatives, the misplaced trust and justifications for abuse of power. That skepticism is important. But we’ve lost the ability to articulate the genuine beauty, sublimity, and joy which can be found in obedience.

Because feminist discourses tend to use an axis of power/oppression as their main analytic tool, they have an even harder time than most mainstream discourses articulating a positive vision of surrender, obedience, humility, or authority. And so feminisms often become justifications for seeking worldly power–military, corporate etc. Women are encouraged to strive for material and social success, rather than men being encouraged to strive for greater surrender, humility, and obedience. (Apparently my line, “Maybe the problem isn’t that women lack power but that men lack humility,” was pretty popular.) This not only targets women’s behavior as the problem, contributing to the constant “you’re doing it wrong” woman-blaming which is endemic to feminism in a misogynistic culture; it also accepts worldly value systems which the Gospel rejects.

I was surprised and heartened by how many people wanted to take up this idea. The critique of worldly power and revival of the metaphor of surrender recurred throughout the launch party/conference. My impression is that this is something a lot of religious women really want to talk about.

* The critique of power and praise for obedience gained a lot of credibility from the fact that at least two of the panelists who talked about it had done a lot of advocacy against domestic violence. (Shahed Amanullah and, I think???, Christy Vines. I remember it was two of us but not which two.) Obviously women’s praise for submission can become a justification for abuse, and I was really grateful that we had panelists who had up-close experience of how that works and how it can be countered.

* I always learn stuff when I run my mouth, and this time, I was able to articulate something I hadn’t quite grasped before: Human beings need relationships in which we obey. We need obedience as much as, and in much the same way as, we need to feel that our voices are heard and our needs considered. We need hierarchical relationships, where one person more-or-less commands and the other obeys; we need relationships of mutual surrender in which the partners either submit in turn or submit to one another so constantly that figuring out who is “obeying” at any given moment is basically impossible; and we need relationships which move from hierarchy to mutuality.

(The “more or less” is important, though. I listen to my spiritual director and do what he says as a general rule, but my freedom is intact, and I trust that he respects me and listens to my concerns, even when I disagree with him. It’s a hierarchical relationship but not a rigid or controlling one. If you don’t like “commands/obeys,” as a word to describe that dynamic, maybe “guides/follows”? I personally find thinking of my role as obedience helpful–it’s good for my humility!–but like, my whole thing is that different people need different metaphors, even when expressing a universal human need.)

* I was hilariously scatterbrained and inarticulate, for which I apologize, but I did manage to suggest that many men have experienced a salutary education in obedience and submission through the 12 Steps. This is basically Helen Rittelmeyer’s point again. Among the people who respond well to 12-Step spirituality, many of them report that the concepts of surrender and humility were hugely important to them. Lots of these people are men. (I agree with those who speculate that emphasizing or demanding acceptance of metaphors of surrender and powerlessness can be less-helpful and even damaging to women, especially women who are often already deeply ashamed and traumatized.) One question we might ask is, Why didn’t these men get their education in humility from their church? What was the church not saying to them?

* One audience member asked a question about how, as a lgbt-identified faithful Mormon, she could ask for greater respect from progressives. I mishandled this question badly; my response is the thing I most regret about the event. So if you’re reading this, anonymous lgbt Mormon person, this is an apology to you.

Here’s A Queer Calling answering the actual question.

The striking thing about this moment, from a less self-centered perspective, is that the other two panelists who answered gave basically the objectively correct answer, which is: Tell your story. Be honest and personal and get to know people, and they will generally begin to see you as a person and not an ideological caricature. Find spaces where you feel safe enough to do that.

I’m pretty sure I was the only lgbt-identified person on any of the panels; and so the fact that my fellow panelists totally grasped the question and responded empathetically and wisely seems to me like a great sign both about the AltFem team and about the progress we’ve made in presenting lgbt issues within “traditional” (ugh) religious communities.

* Mollie Z. Hemingway is one of my favorite personality types, the happy warrior. I loved her story about how when she was growing up her mom would explain un-Christian stuff, on the TV or wherever, with, “That’s what Americans do. We don’t do that.”

* Also loved Jamillah Karim’s phrasing when she said that her faith gave her the courage to resign her tenured post at Spellman College to homeschool her kids.

* Hemingway on Twitter: “Yeah, @slowhoneybee is like a good version of Bridget Fonda nursing her baby while plotting murder in A Simple Plan.”

* Susan Katz Miller ditto: “So I left my teenage son in charge of the brisket and went to speak at #FaithFem. The veggies are burnt, but it’s tender. A sweet new year!”

* Rabia Chaudry ditto, quoting one of the Muslim panelists (I’m sorry, I didn’t write down who said this): “Hadith: a woman in pregnancy has same reward from God as someone in constant prayer & fasting. #faithfem“

* SojoWomen quoting Salma Abugidieri: “S.Abugidieri on gender norms & religious dating:”Marriage is about mutual love where both husband and wife are submissive to God.” #faithfem“

* Sarah Pulliam Bailey quoting Hemingway: “It’s not a Christian idea that family matters above all other things. That’s not in Christian history. — @MZHemingway #faithfem” (MZH also had great stuff on forgiveness as part of marriage’s core, American Christian idolatry of marriage, and Martin Luther changing diapers, which is one thing I am okay with Martin Luther doing.)

ETA: Oh man, that should obviously be “one thing I am okay with Martin Luther changing“! Esprit d’escalier strikes again.

Anyway, I got a lot out of this event, and look forward to seeing where AltFem goes.

I'm on a submarine mission for you baby

she says "I am not a femini-i-ist"

sweet smell of success

woman is the irony of the community

Previous Post

September 25, 2014

Helloooooo Greensboro NC! Would You Like Me to Come Speak?

Next Post

September 25, 2014 Self-Abboting: Sin or Vice? A Very Small "Gay and Catholic" Book Extra

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said: "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Peter John James