Book Extras: Song for a Future Generation

Last updated on: August 27, 2014 at 10:02 pm by Eve Tushnet

Book Extras: Song for a Future Generation 2014-08-27T22:02:54-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

At the end of the book I point out that we can’t predict all the ways that welcoming gay/queer/same-sex attracted Christians will change our churches. In both the book and “Coming Out Christian” I talk about some of the ways I hope the increasing visibility and inclusion of gay Christians will change the churches–and our whole culture–but this is not something you or I control. I doubt that the nascent g/q/ssa Christian communities will agree on all these changes; I fully expect to end my days muttering about all those young whippersnappers and what they don’t understand, etc etc.

Here I’ll talk about some of the changes I’m already seeing, ordered very roughly from least-challenging to me personally to most-challenging. And let me ask you guys: Which changes are you already seeing, if any, as chaste gay Christians become more visible in your church and in the rest of society? Which changes do you hope to see?

*ETA: Hey I forgot some really important ones! I guess I forgot them because I already explored them in more detail in the book. But as more people are visibly both gay and faithful to the historical Christian teaching, all of us will feel less pressure to be the perfect poster gay, the representative of an entire weird worldview. We’re becoming more willing to come out of the closet and are reaping greater benefits of camaraderie and understanding when we do come out. We’re learning from one another rather than forging a solitary path in the wilderness. Super great stuff.

* More same-sex couples or partners at church, being visibly in love–and invisibly celibate. You never did know which of the men who go to Mass together, who seem more physically affectionate than the American norm, who have lived together for donkey’s years, who refer to each other by pet names or introduce each other as “my partner,” were actually having sex. (Unless they told you.) Nor was it ever your business, especially if you attend a church which handles confession and discipline primarily through priests, spiritual directors and spiritual fathers, pastors, accountability partners, or other named and designated leaders. But as more people strive to live chastely while also perceiving a call to entwine their lives with another person of the same sex, or make the difficult transition from sexually-active couplehood to celibate partnership, the rest of us will have to confront our own assumptions about what a celibate person looks like and what a couple relationship means.

A Queer Calling points to Frederica Mathewes-Green’s advice on this subject, and I think it’s quite sound. I do think we need to have the humility to be open (out of the closet!) about our celibacy, although it’s something I personally find much more humiliating to discuss than my boring old lesbianism. But the fact that we need to respond to other people’s concerns and questions with humor, humility, and grace doesn’t actually make our bedrooms the public business of the parish.

Churches are also going to find out that many of their members’ assumptions about gender presentation aren’t right: You don’t have to be a Macho Duck to be a Christian man; butch lesbians are just as faithful as their lipsticked sisters. American culture has ridiculously rigid boundaries for gender expression and it’s beyond time that our churches stopped trying to fit new members into the equivalent of pink princess or camo football baptismal robes.

* Similarly, the meaning of public same-sex physical affection and intimacy will change. Right now, if I see two adult men holding hands on the street, I think I know what that means. But am I right? Holding hands is a super normal way, within many cultures, for friends to show affection, first of all. And I don’t recall for sure that I’ve seen any of the celibate partners I’ve known hold hands, but I’ve definitely seen them show other signs of physical affection which I tend to associate with couplehood–leaning on a shoulder, or that familiar nudge which speaks of long-term trust and love. The more people are openly lgbt, openly partnered, and openly celibate, the more we’ll all be aware that these gestures of love may not convey the sexual, religious, or relationship-status information we thought they did.

* Subgroups within the church which were once almost exclusively concerned with changing church teaching will become more open to guiding members to lead faithful queer lives. Most large-enough churches have some subgroup within them for whom changing church doctrine regarding sexuality is a top priority. But many of these groups are now encountering openly gay Christians who want to live church doctrine.

It turns out that we actually have a lot in common: All (most) of us have faced discrimination or marginalization on the basis of our sexuality; all/most of us want changes in how our churches understand sexuality, family, and committed love; all of us seek to welcome parents who are struggling with their children’s coming out, and people struggling to understand and accept their sexual orientation. There’s a lot to morality other than “is it okay to have gay sex?”, including the moral imperative to welcome the stranger, to honor one’s parents and cherish one’s children, and to hate nothing God has made–including oneself.

And so I think we’ll see more groups moving from “internal opposition” to “meeting people where they are,” and more attempts for people with different beliefs about their church’s sexual doctrine to work together–not debating groups but support groups. That’s a VERY tough model, but I think it’s inevitable that it will spread, and while it is not the One Best Way, it has advantages over groups with more defined positions such as Courage.

* Gay Pride will change. I’m so ambivalent about Pride myself! Like I said, this list includes things I’m a bit sketched on, and here is where the sketchiness on my part starts. I love the beads and the feathers (more Christian events should throw beads and flourish feathers!) and I do realize that “pride” here is opposed to shame and self-hatred, not humility. But I still don’t like the name, the event is obviously very sexualized (yes, still, I don’t think I’m being a prude here) and corporate, and the majority of it is given over to political, moral, and religious advocacy I can’t get behind. All covered in a sticky film of decadent late capitalism!

That said, I have celibate, Christian friends who go to Pride. Some of them really thrive on the antidote to shame that it represents. It’s a chance to feel what it’s like to be out of the closet, away from the closet’s temptations. It’s also a chance to support actual needs of members of queer communities: health care, advocacy and shelter for homeless youth, political advocacy for victims of anti-gay violence, etc.

Several gay, celibate Christians I know have wondered what the local churches who do uphold the historic Christian teaching on sexuality can offer at Gay Pride. I thought about this myself and really don’t know. Would anything that e.g. the Catholic Church offered be read as disingenuous, a bait-and-switch? Or could we really hand out copies of Always Our Children? flyers with contact information for priests who have experience dealing with gay people across the spectrum of acceptance and rejection of Church doctrine? could priests be on-site to hear confessions??? or just talk with people who are interested in knowing more about what the Church truly believes and teaches about gay lives? schedule a discussion group, or a showing of “Desire of the Everlasting Hills,” and advertise that at Pride? could we throw rosary beads?

The Church has a long tradition of baptizing whatever can be baptized in the strange and even pagan cultures She has encountered. It’s worth asking what can be baptized at Pride. Especially since I think inevitably we will see churches and individual Christians try this stuff out. Pride is going to change, maybe a tiny bit at the margins here and there, maybe in some actual noticeable way that we can all recognize.

So: That’s what I’m seeing already. What are you guys seeing? What do you want to see?

Previous Post

August 27, 2014

Here Is the Time! Now Is the Place! Book Me to Speak This Fall and Beat the Rush.

Next Post

August 27, 2014 No Werewolf But the Class Werewolf: Short movie reviews

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Whose dreams of sheaves and stars caused jealousy?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Judah Asher Joseph Issachar