How many chapters are in the book of Luke?

Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Eve Tushnet

Home
Catholic
Religious Music & Entertainment

Last updated on: July 16, 2006 at 10:29 pm by Eve Tushnet

2006-07-16T22:29:00-04:00 Eve Tushnet

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

ANNA THE K: Ratty gave me Richard Pevear and Larissa Volonkhosky’s translation of Anna Karenina, and I finally finished it. These are some fairly random and unfocused thoughts about a really great book; your comments welcome. Spoilers throughout, not so much for the climax (which I expect everyone knows about) but for other things in the novel–and I’m glad I didn’t know about those things before reading it, because I do enjoy suspense in reading, so if you haven’t read AK and think you might not want to know all of the plot points, you might want to skip this post.

Og No Like: OK, I am not good at the 19th-century novel. All those scenes! Scenes of people doing stuff, for no apparent reason–shopping for leeks, talking about paintings, but rarely in a way that connects up with the larger themes or plot-arcs. It’s realistic, I suppose: Most of what we do all day doesn’t connect to the “themes or plot-arcs” of our own lives, yeah? But it’s also boring and frustrating for me as a reader. I have real life to be random and seemingly pointless–it’s not what I go to novels for. (Insert rant about how expressionism is the ultimate Catholic style. Someday I’ll write that rant.)

I also found both Levin and (especially!) Kitty kind of slappable, especially in Kitty’s relation to Levin’s brother’s mistress. Very Lady Bountiful. But see below.

And the ending, with Levin’s thoughts about God, was… unsatisfying. I know it’s very difficult to write about religious experiences in general–as a reader I often come to such descriptions with a high level of defensiveness, and have an unusually hard time relating to experiences that are very unlike mine. And Levin’s inner life in this final section is very, very unlike mine. So I am not completely willing to say, “This section failed.” I’ll just say that it failed for me, and I disliked it, and didn’t see the point of it.

Og Like!: Well, now that I’ve beaten up on a writer who had more talent in his pinky toenail than I have in my entire self, I will say that opening with the Oblonskys and closing with the Levins is perfect. Avoiding opening or closing with the triangle at the book’s center really works. At some level it makes the book less tragic and more bourgeois–its assumptions are steadier than what I’d expect from a tragedy, if you see what I mean.

I did love so many of the characters: Stiva, Seryozha, Karenin especially, I think. All of the characters felt very real. And the Levins’ childbirth scene was amazing, one of the most powerful things I’ve read in a novel. See below for more on that.

Heteronarrativity: Okay, now this I found really interesting, but I’m also worried that others will a) find it obvious and boring or b) think I’m saying something that I’m not. But fortuna favet audaci, so here goes: Anna Karenina may be the most heterosexual novel I’ve ever read.

Partly, this is a statement about me: I haven’t read any Austen, nor any Trollope, for example. (And yes, I plan to remedy the Austen thing, at least, very soon.)

But even so–AK‘s narrative thrust and emotional power come from its depiction of things like: how having a child with a person changes your view of that person (for good or ill). How your changing relationship to your child’s parent changes your relationship with your child (again, for good or ill). How the inescapability of childbearing changes marriage (and adultery). How societal expectations change people when acceptance of these norms is the default, rather than heroic resistance being the default.

And there are elements very common in the other works I’ve loved, but absent or marginal in AK: alienation is the most obvious. There’s less emphasis on physical beauty than I’m used to, I think, with a correspondingly greater emphasis on clothes and other cultural products. (The land is depicted in a way that does emphasize its beauty, but embeds that beauty in a rhythm of work and generativity.)

AK resonated very strongly with me–though almost exclusively because it sounded so much like what married friends of mine had experienced, not at all because it sounded like my experience. I’m not trying to make any larger point really; I just thought this was interesting, and would, as I said, welcome readers’ comments.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 16, 2006

Next Post

July 17, 2006

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Best-Of Gay Catholic Whatnot Mackerel-Snapping self-obsessed Too much is never enough Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many chapters are in the book of Luke?

Select your answer to see how you score.

22 28 20 24