David J.H. Beldman on the Book of Judges

Last updated on: July 13, 2020 at 5:48 am by Michael F. Bird

David J.H. Beldman on the Book of Judges 2020-03-30T22:55:05-04:00 Michael F. Bird

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

David J. H. Beldman

Judges
Two Horizons Old Testament Commentary Series
Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2020.
Available at Eerdmans.

Reviewed by Dr. Lindsay Wilson.

This is a good book in a series that takes seriously the theological message of the Old Testament. It is more self-consciously theological than others in the series (the 3 sections are theological introduction, theological commentary and theological reflection). Amongst other volumes in this series, it surprisingly stands out in giving nearly 60% of the words to commentary on the text (the series guidelines are 40%), which makes it more like the traditional commentary format. Yet, in his comments on the text he still focuses on literary and theological matters with his key (well-chosen) interlocutors being Dan Block and Barry Webb. Beldman himself is a published author on Judges, having written a short, popular introduction (in the Transformative Word series), and a major monograph based on his PhD on the difficult end section of chapters 17-21. His introduction sets the book in its literary and historical contexts, but also makes room for reception history—how it has been read (or to use his preferred term, ‘heard’) from early Christian and Jewish times as far as contemporary postmodern listeners. His key metaphor in the introduction is ‘hearing Judges’, by which he means ‘hearing God speak’ through the book. His focus is on how Judges operates as scripture, not merely as an historical record. His basic conviction is that “Judges is a book about God’s covenant people whose witness and way being in the world had been deeply compromised by the religion and culture of the surrounding nations.” This conviction provides the hermeneutical foundation for a thoroughly relevant reading of the book, inviting us to face our own ‘idolatry’ in the twenty-first century.

He follows literary readers of the text like Barry Webb who view Judges as a book in its own right, and not simply part of Deuteronomistic History. His view is that the narrator is portrayed as omniscient, reliable and reticent (i.e. restrained in giving evaluative comment). The section from 2:6-3:6 is helpfully read as outlining Israel’s covenant infidelity, the core problem that leads in chapters 3-16 to the raising up of a succession of judges. The flawed character of these judges points forward, he argues, to Israel’s longing for a better leader who will address the underlying issue. The most original contribution is made in his discussion of the problematic chapters 17-21. Effectively, he re-reads the book as a whole from the perspective of this end, bringing the story to a close by showing a progressive decline in Israel’s behavior. This final section also recalls the opening circular patters of 1:1-3:6, highlighting the lack of progress or forward movement in the book. The surfacing of images connected to kingship and cult in these final chapters identifies a way forward for Israel—to return to grounding their communal life in God’s kingship, and in the cultic practices that drew attention to all that he had done for them in the past.

The final section of the book (Theological Reflection) is surprisingly short (perhaps half of other volumes in this series), but it is clear and insightful. He deals with Judges and biblical theology, systematic theology and its lessons for today. After showing the place of Judges in the grand narrative of scripture (reading it in its place in the OT first, and then as part of the Bible as a whole), he turns to its connection with systematic theology. While Beldman was confident and comfortable in outlining its role in biblical theology, he seems slightly less so in relation to systematics. There is more limited interaction with secondary sources, but still some useful input in areas such as the doctrine of God, the Spirit (claiming a bit too much here, I think), sin and political theology. He leaves contentious issues like violence, the treatment of women in the book, and idolatry/autonomy to the final section (Hearing Judges Today). In retrospect, I would have liked this section on Theological Reflection to be expanded, as this is really the main distinctive contribution of the series.

All in all, we are in the hands of an expert guide who walks us thoughtfully through the book of Judges. This is a useful tool for preachers, as well as for theological students and educated laypeople who want to grapple with the many problems that the book presents. What emerges is a reading of the book that highlights its usefulness in addressing our contemporary world.

Lindsay Wilson is Senior Lecturer in Old Testament at Ridley College, Melbourne, Australia.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 10, 2020

Lynn Cohick on Ephesians

Next Post

July 14, 2020 Tom Holland's Dominion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Lands Blogosphere Book Review Calvinism Colleges & Universities Ecclesiology Emerging Adulthood Evangelicalism Foreign Affairs Gospel of John Greco-Roman World Humor Just War N. T. Wright Old Testament Resurrection Terrorism Theological Education Travel Uncategorized Writing

Select a Month September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who prophesied against Tyre, predicting it would become a bare rock?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Daniel Joel Amos Ezekiel

Books by This Author Books by Mike Bird

See All Titles »