On the Origins of Divine Christology

Last updated on: May 19, 2019 at 5:39 am by Michael F. Bird

On the Origins of Divine Christology 2019-01-13T21:13:11-04:00 Michael F. Bird

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Andrew Ter Ern Loke

The Origin of Divine Christology
SNTSMS; Cambridge: CUP, 2017.
Available at Amazon.com

This book is a critique of evolutionary schemes of christological development as well as an argument that the only reason why the early church believed that Jesus was “true God” is because he himself believed so or at least gave that impression. There are good discussions about the nature of divinity in the ancient world and early church, function and being in christology, reiteration of the importance of monotheism and the creation-creature divide in Judaism, exegeses of Phil 2.5-11 and 1 Cor 8.6, and an attempt to prove that the earliest christology was indeed the highest. Loke’s view is that:

If the earliest Christians knew that Christ had himself indicated that he was not divine, or that he did not indicate that he was divine, then it is unlikely that they would have come to the widespread acknowledgment that he was truly divine. On the other hand, the proposal that Jesus had clearly indicated that he regarded himself as truly divine would adequately explain how the highest Christology of the earliest Christians could have been held by even the more traditionalist Jewish Christians. Because they were Christians, they would all have agreed that what Christ indicated was what God demanded that they believe (p. 22).

I’m broadly supportive of Loke’s theory, and I’ve argued similarly in How God Became Jesus and Jesus, the Eternal Son, that Jesus saw himself as embodying the presence of YHWH, exercising divine prerogatives like the forgiveness of sins and judgment, and believed himself in a position of sovereignty equal to YHWH. Jesus certainly and I think deliberately blurred the lines between God as author of salvation and God’s agent of salvation. The memory of Jesus’s claims about himself, as well as the exegesis and experience of the early church, led to their view of Jesus as divine, and divine in the sense of part of the divine identity, which is why Jesus was worshipped and venerated. I don’t think this emerged simply from belief in the resurrection, started with adoptionism and ended with incarnation, nor through a syncretism of alien forces rooted in Greco-Roman religion.

Still, there are a few things I wish Loke did in this book. More on diversity of early christologizing, certainly by the end of the first century and in beginning of the early second century, you have Jesus’s divinity taken in different directions by docetists and even those with an angelomorphic christology too. There was diversity on when and how Jesus was divine! Also, I would hasten to add that not everything the early church believed about Jesus necessarily has to be authorized by the historical Jesus himself. For example, believing that Jesus is the “prince/leader” (Acts 3:15; 5:31; Heb 2:10; 12:2) does not depend upon Jesus claiming the title for himself, rather, what matters is what God has revealed to be true of him (something that I think Bultmann was right about, though he took it in an extreme way so that Jesus’s own self-consciousness was entirely irrelevant).

Otherwise, this is a very fine book, it argues that a high christology is not only early, but was even the christology of Jesus!

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 18, 2019

Islam in North America

Next Post

May 20, 2019 Every Day Glory

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Lands Blogosphere Book Review Calvinism Colleges & Universities Ecclesiology Emerging Adulthood Evangelicalism Foreign Affairs Gospel of John Greco-Roman World Humor Just War N. T. Wright Old Testament Resurrection Terrorism Theological Education Travel Uncategorized Writing

Select a Month September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the king of Babylon when Daniel was in the lions’ den?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Darius Nebuchadnezzar Cyrus Belshazzar

Books by This Author Books by Mike Bird

See All Titles »