The Authority of Nature?

Last updated on: April 29, 2018 at 5:59 am by Michael F. Bird

The Authority of Nature? 2018-04-07T02:35:17-04:00 Michael F. Bird

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve always been intrigued by argument to the effect that something is good/right because it is “natural” or wrong/bad because it is “unnatural.” People have tried to argue for the validity of all sorts of things based on its authorization of “nature.

To begin with, the very notion of “nature” is polyvalent. The vocabulary we use for the external world is freighted with various connotations. What we call “nature” often has romantic connotations of tranquility without toxicity; while “creation” implies a certain theology and relation towards the divine; and “environment” evokes the notion of the world as an autonomous machine or living organism. You might think that a forest is nature, but so is an urban metropolis, both are composed out of earthly materials and both are part of the physical world. If nature is simply our external fixtures, then a city is no less part of nature than a waterfall, irrespective of whether we build a mud hut or a multi-story hacienda. Also, what we think about “nature” is mediated and constructed by the institutions, traditions, and media around us, and formed by our own experience of the external world. The so-called “nature” is perceived and constructed differently by artists, scientists, explorers, tribal people, city folk, and so on.[1] For one person, a forest may be a scenic place of peace and serenity; for someone else, that same jungle might be a place of predatory beasts and pitiless terror that one daily struggles against for survival. In other words, there is no universal definition and uniform or experience of nature and how we relate to it.

In addition, appeals to the authority of nature must be treated with caution because such appeals often mask demands towards uniformity in ethics, politics, and social behavior, whether that pertains to inalienable human rights, or even to political absolutism.[2] According to Lorraine Daston and Fernando Vidal, “Almost every ideology seeks to sign up nature for its cause, to bolster its shaky political credentials with nature’s authority. Just because that authority can be so widely commandeered, critics imagine nature as a kind of blank screen or mirror on which the most diverse human fantasies may be projected. Paradoxically, the most obdurate authority -nature’s necessity – has been joined in these accounts to the most malleable of cultural constructs – nature as anything you care to make it.”[3] It is unsurprising to learn that people have always tried to make nature something of an authority to determine human conduct. It was common in the nineteenth century to argue that certain things were “in accordance with nature,” including capitalism, Marxism, democracy, monarchy, patriarchy, slavery, feminism, and a lot more. Even before that, in the Hellenistic world, people tried to proscribe certain behaviors as being out of step with nature. So it is interesting that Paul uses such an argument in Rom 1:26-27 when he critiques homoeroticism between women as “contrary to nature” and between men as “abandoning natural relations with women.” Against Paul, some have retorted that homosexual relationships are in fact “natural” because they are found in the animal kingdom and humans can be biologically disposed towards same-sex attraction.[4] I want to side-step the relative merits or demerits of Paul’s appeal to nature to censure homoerotic practices.[5] My point is that appeals to the normativity of nature are not straightforward and can sometimes mask hidden agendas that affect human existence.

[1] Alister McGrath, The Open Secret: A New Vision for Natural Theology (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008), 115–39; idem, A Scientific Theology (3 vols.; Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2001-3), 1:81-133.

[2] See Lorraine Daston and Fernando Vidal (eds.), The Moral Authority of Nature (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2004).

[3] Lorraine Daston and Fernando Vidal, “Introduction,” in The Moral Authority of Nature (eds. L. Daton and F. Vidal; Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2004), 11.

[4] See Bruce Bagemihl, Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2013).

[5] See Preston Sprinkle, People to Be Loved: Why Homosexuality is Not Just an Issue (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2015), 93-98.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 27, 2018

Book Review: Michael Gorman on Scripture and Its Interpretation

Next Post

May 1, 2018 Should Men Mentor Women?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Lands Blogosphere Book Review Calvinism Colleges & Universities Ecclesiology Emerging Adulthood Evangelicalism Foreign Affairs Gospel of John Greco-Roman World Humor Just War N. T. Wright Old Testament Resurrection Terrorism Theological Education Travel Uncategorized Writing

Select a Month September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does 2 Peter say scoffers will say in the last days?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Where is this 'coming' he promised? Jesus will never return The world will never end There is no God

Books by This Author Books by Mike Bird

See All Titles »