Book Notice: Jesus, the Temple, and the Son of Man

Last updated on: December 16, 2014 at 2:17 am by Michael F. Bird

Book Notice: Jesus, the Temple, and the Son of Man 2014-12-13T05:35:32-04:00 Michael F. Bird

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Robert H. Stein

Jesus, the Temple, and the Coming Son of Man: A Commentary on Mark 13
Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2014.
Available at Amazon.com

Robert Stein has written some great books on the Gospels, climaxing in his Mark commentary for the BECNT series. Here he attempts the first real full-length treatment of Mark 13 by an evangelical since the time of George Beasley-Murray.

The best thing about Stein’s book is that it sets out the interpretive issues and main exegetical options for understanding Mark 13. Such as whether the two questions in 13:4 are about one or more issues. The meaning of the “sign,” “in those days,” and “this generation” as well as the meaning of the parable of the fig tree, and Jesus’ ignorance about the timing of the end.

Stein disagrees with Wright and McKnight that Mark 13 uses end-of-the-world language in Mark 13:24-27 to describe the destruction of the temple. He finds that unlikely in light of how (1) OT texts shift between the figurative and the literal (e.g. Jer 4:23-23/4:25-26); (2) Other Son of Man coming-sayings like Mark 8:28; (3) The parallel language that occurs in Matthew and Paul which definitely refers to the parousia; and (4) The temporal disconnect with “But after that tribulation …” implying something happens after the temple is destroyed. A view which accords with Edward Adam and Dale Allison in their critique of N.T. Wright.

According to Stein:

Mark 13:24-27 is best understood as a theophanic act of God in which the Son of Man comes from heaven and sends his angels to gather the elect from the four winds or corners of the earth …This section concerning the Son of Man will be completed in 13:32-27 by a parable concerning the unknowable nature of the time of the Son of man’s coming” (pp. 119-20).

Let me add that Stein’s volume is worth getting simply for his translation of Mark 13 with various interpretive glosses that try to clarify the disputed parts of the text. That said, I’m still not convinced by his argument and I would maintain with Wright/McKnight a more preterist interpretation of the Marcan olivet discourse. In my mind, the coming of the Son of Man has to be about the destruction of Jerusalem, since the parable of the fig tree really gives the game away on that one. Any way, Stein has produced a short but stimulating book on a disputed topic in Marcan scholarship.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 15, 2014

An Australian Perspective on CIA Torture Report

Next Post

December 16, 2014 Mike Bird's "The Gospel of the Lord" wins CT Book Award For Biblical Studies

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Lands Blogosphere Book Review Calvinism Colleges & Universities Ecclesiology Emerging Adulthood Evangelicalism Foreign Affairs Gospel of John Greco-Roman World Humor Just War N. T. Wright Old Testament Resurrection Terrorism Theological Education Travel Uncategorized Writing

Select a Month September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: According to Romans, if God is for us, no one can be against us.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Books by This Author Books by Mike Bird

See All Titles »