Andrew Lincoln and the Virgin Conception

Last updated on: September 14, 2014 at 6:40 am by Michael F. Bird

Andrew Lincoln and the Virgin Conception 2014-09-14T06:40:21-04:00 Michael F. Bird

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Andrew T. Lincoln

Born of a Virgin: Reconceiving Jesus in the Bible, Tradition, and Theology
London: SPCK, 2013.
Available at Amazon.com

This book is an attempt to show that one can still maintain a high christology of the incarnation without believing in a literal virgin conception of Jesus.

Lincoln argues that the oldest tradition in the NT about Jesus’ birth is that he was born from the “seed of David” with Joseph as his real father (Rom 1.3; Acts 2.30, 13.23). Even Luke and Matthew show signs of sources that reflect a minority view on Jesus’ birth as irregular but not necessarily miraculous. The Gospel nativity story is simply too close in character to Greco-Roman legends about the birth of certain heroes to be taken as history. In addition, modern views of the biology of procreation make a virgin conception either superfluous or problematic for a doctrine of the incarnation. In sum, Lincoln has written a neo-Schleiermacherian view of the virgin birth with a bit of anti-Barthian protest about it too.

Let me say that I could hypothetically imagine the birth narratives to be adaptations of Greco-Roman birth stories of ancient heroes combined with Jewish midrash on OT birth stories, then applied to Jesus, which function as transparently fictionalized accounts of Jesus’ birth in order to accentuate his identity as the Son of God. The net effect would be to show God’s role in preparing Jesus for a special work with a special birth and putting him on an equal path to greatness as enjoyed by other political and religious heroes of the ancient world who also had miraculous births. Such stories would heighten his messianic status, the divine preordination of his work, and to set him forth as a deliberate alternative to the propaganda of the Roman imperium about the divine sonship of the emperor. While I can “imagine” that, I just don’t think that is what the Evangelists were doing, nor is it what they were perceived to be doing in the early church.

The reasons for my apprehension is that I’m not convinced that Joseph’s acceptance of Jesus as his legal son would have prevented speculation from the irregularity of the circumstances surrounding his birth to the possibility of Jesus’ illegitimacy. The rumours of illegitimacy/irregularity are closest we can get historically to the story of Jesus’ conception (however we might interpret that fact). I’m also not convinced that because Jesus was known as coming from the “seed of David” that he must have been Joseph’s biological son. For a start, Jesus could have been from the “seed of David” by virtue of his maternal origins in Mary. Also sonship language can be metaphorical. Paul argues that Gentiles are from the “seed” of Abraham without having a biological connection to Abraham, nor was Augustus a biological son of Julius Caesar in order to be a “son of the divine Julius.” So Jesus’ Davidic status does not have to be biological (in fact, some think that Mark 12:35-37 is a debate over this very point!). In my mind, the NT has only two views on the virgin conception, its affirmation in Luke and Matthew and non-reference to it in the rest of the NT. While Mark, John, Paul, and Hebrews do not mention it, neither do it the say anything that I think rules it out either.

Those criticisms aside, I think this is one of the best non-conservative books on the virgin conception that I’ve read. It is not written with the condescending and dismissive treatment like Spong or Ludemann. There is a good effort to think through the doctrine in light of biblical criticism, incarnational christology, and even the biology of procreation. Even for those who disagree, it certainly raises the issues that need to be addressed. So I agree with what Howard Marshall wrote in his JSNT review, “What is certain is that this book is now essential reading on the topic.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 8, 2014

Introducing the Biblica Hipsteria

Next Post

September 16, 2014 Book Review: Evangelical vs Liturgical

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Lands Blogosphere Book Review Calvinism Colleges & Universities Ecclesiology Emerging Adulthood Evangelicalism Foreign Affairs Gospel of John Greco-Roman World Humor Just War N. T. Wright Old Testament Resurrection Terrorism Theological Education Travel Uncategorized Writing

Select a Month September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How was the New Covenant different from the Old Covenant?

Select your answer to see how you score.

It was only for priests It abolished God’s law It would be written on their hearts It required more sacrifices

Books by This Author Books by Mike Bird

See All Titles »