A Doctrinal Correction and Marketing Tip for Complementarian Church Plants

Last updated on: February 15, 2014 at 4:06 am by Michael F. Bird

A Doctrinal Correction and Marketing Tip for Complementarian Church Plants 2014-02-13T06:54:20-04:00 Michael F. Bird

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Acts 29 network is a church planting movement that establishes Bible-believing churches in various places throughout the world, including in Australia. I recently came across a peculiar item in their doctrinal statement about love, Christ, leadership, and gender (HT: Megan Du Toit).

You can read their doctrinal statement here, which is fairly straight forward, tries to be non-adversarial, but takes a stand on certain issues. Given who they are and what they are doing, that’s fair enough, even if you disagree with them.

The dot-point I question is this one:

We are not egalitarians and do believe that men should head their homes and male elders/pastors should lead their churches with masculine love like Jesus Christ.

A couple of comments I want to make.

First, it is undoubtedly true that Jesus’ divinity does not transcend or swallow up his humanity, including his masculinity. Jesus became a human being, a man no less, with the specific physiological, neurological, and biochemical make-up of a man. However, that is not to say that divine love is thereby defined in terms of his masculinity (that’d be Rahner’s rule gone very wrong!). While the man Jesus undoubtedly loved others as a man, he exercised love prior to the incarnation, prior to taking on human and male qualities into himself. What is more, male love is not a separate species of love compared to female love, not everything about the incarnate Jesus’ love is man specific. For case in point, self-sacrifice is the ultimate love and men and women are equally capable of that (see John 15:13). Thus, God’s love is no more masculine than it is feminine. Not because God’s love is neutered, but because divine love encompasses all that is specific to male and female expressions of love for one another and even exceeds them. Christians are undoubtedly exhorted to imitate divine love and Jesus’ love – see especially the Johannine Letters – but that love is never, ever defined in terms of a specific gender. In fact, if it was, it would imply that women can never really express or experience divine love in a full sense. To identify divine love or even Christ’s love with a particular gender is just as mistaken as identifying divine love with a particular race or ethnicity. Should we talk about the middle eastern love of Jesus or the circumcised love of Jesus or the semitic love of Jesus? No, of course not.

Second, does anyone really think that unbelieving and unchurched men will be more attracted to church because they can experience the “masculine” love of Christ. I don’t know, but when I think of all the reasons I have for going to church, the prospect of “man-love” is not one of them. Now maybe it might work for an episcopalian church plant in San Francisco, each to their own, but I wouldn’t use masculine love as my part of my church marketing campaign.

So, I would suggest that Acts 29 tweak their doctrinal statement to as follows:

We believe in the complementarity of men and women and that men therefore should head their homes and male elders/pastors should lead and love their churches in the same way that God loves the world and that Jesus Christ loves his church.

No reference to masculine love required, unless you want to mess up the concept of divine love, disenfranchise women, and reach out to the gay community with a message of man-love.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 14, 2014

Brill's 15 Most Downloaded Journal Articles in Biblical Studies ... Free!

Next Post

February 16, 2014 What Do You Do First in Studying the Gospels: The Theological Narratives or Critical History?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Lands Blogosphere Book Review Calvinism Colleges & Universities Ecclesiology Emerging Adulthood Evangelicalism Foreign Affairs Gospel of John Greco-Roman World Humor Just War N. T. Wright Old Testament Resurrection Terrorism Theological Education Travel Uncategorized Writing

Select a Month September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Eden" (as in Garden of Eden) mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Delight Green Land Beginning Blessing

Books by This Author Books by Mike Bird

See All Titles »