Book Notice: History of Princeton Seminary

Last updated on: January 18, 2013 at 8:00 pm by Michael F. Bird

Book Notice: History of Princeton Seminary 2013-01-18T20:00:02-04:00 Michael F. Bird

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

James H. Moorhead

Princeton Seminary in American Religion and Culture
Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2012.
Available at Amazon.com

In what is my best new read for 2013, James H. Moorhead’s history of Princeton Seminary is a fascinating read of American religious culture, Presbyterian history, and mapping of theological shifts in mainline America.

I learned much about how PTS was caught between Old and New School Presbyterianism. J.G. Machen is clearly the villain of the volume, while John A. Mackay is clearly the hero. Notably the Old Princeton types of Charles Hodge and B.B. Warfield are given a very sympathetic treatments, they were theological conservatives, but committed churchman. Though by the end, Moorhead regards their camp, of which the last was Charles R. Erdman, as the “ultra-conservatives” (422). Moorhead points out that from its inception PTS embodied a mix of Common Sense Realism, American patriotism, republican values, and evangelical Calvinism and it was the struggle to hold all these together which was the challenge for the Seminary in the following decades and even centuries.

To give a few tid bits of highlights: Charles Hodge went on a two year study tour of Europe without his family, doubt if my wife would let me do that! (102). About Joseph Addison Alexander, Charles Hodge’s colleague, it is said: “A bachelor until his death, he very nearly approximated the popular caricature of the total scholar, one whose highly structured lire was disciplined toward the goal of maximum intellectual effort” (105). The separation of church and state did not mean complete separation, but only neutrality between the various Protestant denominations according to Fred Hood (143). In an intriguing thought, reminding me of William Webb’s book, views of slavery and women go together. Charles Hodge rejected the claims of the Abolitionist movement because it seemed anarchic with its various opinions about the role of government and the rights of women (169).There’s a very interesting section on the first black students at Princeton including their struggle to gain quarters, but how they were treated well once they settled in (185-96). There is a great section on one African-America student named Matthew Anderson who had a particular successful ministry as church planter, social organizer, and educator. This is what he said to his Alma Mater:

We are a Presbyterian of the Presbyterians; the very fiber of our mental make-up being Presbyterian; before this nation came into existence our grand sires were in the Presbyterian Church, and we are firm in the belief that the Presbyterian church is the church for the Negro, but we are forced to say that before the Presbyterian or any other church can have any great success in getting hold of the Negro, the fountain head of that church, the schools of the prophets must be right towards him. For if the Theological Schools are wrong in their attitude towards the Negro, the young men they send out as ministers will be wrong in their attitude towards him, and if the ministry is wrong the people whom they teach will be wrong also, for like priest like people. Let Princeton Seminary, the fountain head of the Presbyterian Church turn about and make herself perfectly right in regard to the Negro (188).

Machen was opposed to black students being permitted to live on campus (196, 255). Whereas Hodge and friends were trying to defend a 17th century neo-Puritanism, others like Nevin and Schaff at Mercerburg were attempting to show the continuity of Protestantism with the broader Christian tradition (208-10). Except for a single decade, a Hodge was on the faculty of PTS from 1822-1937 (225). Geerhardus Vos did his Ph.D on textual criticism of Arabic manuscripts and moved from Western Seminary to Princeton because of troubles over his Supralapsarianism. In one criticism of Machen, he is regarded as being more Anabaptist rather than Presbyterian, envisaging the church as a volunteer society (358). Moving to the mid-twentieth century, John A. Mackay was born in Inverness, where I lived near, and embarked on a successful missionary career in South America (373). Scholars like Bruce Metzger and Otto Piper combined critical acumen and biblical authority together. For Piper, the authority of scripture was based on the fact that it contained the viva vox evangelli, the living voice by which God conveys knowledge of his saving will (438). Piper found himself often in no man’s land because “I had to endure the vitriolic attacks of fundamentalists who denounced me as a disguised modernist and the haughty disdain of liberals who could not understand that a critical scholar should believe that the Bible is the Word of God” (440).When Karl Barth came to Princeton in the early 1960s he was introduced to one of the newest faculty appointments, Freda Gardner, on meeting her he apparently exclaimed, “Vat? A voman?” (500).

A very entertaining read and a reminder that I must apply some day to do a sabbatical at the Center for Theological Inquiry.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 17, 2013

Former Aussie PM John Howard 's NYT Piece on Gun Control in the USA

Next Post

January 21, 2013 Michael Gorman on Paul and the Cruciformed Way of God in Christ

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Lands Blogosphere Book Review Calvinism Colleges & Universities Ecclesiology Emerging Adulthood Evangelicalism Foreign Affairs Gospel of John Greco-Roman World Humor Just War N. T. Wright Old Testament Resurrection Terrorism Theological Education Travel Uncategorized Writing

Select a Month September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the first plague in Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Water turning to blood Darkness Frogs Hail

Books by This Author Books by Mike Bird

See All Titles »